Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Upcoming Birthdays: AlexCaledin
Post Volume: Total: 904,086 Year: 967/14,231 Month: 967/1,514 Week: 0/234 Day: 0/36 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PZ Myers vs. Adaptationism
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 878 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 1 of 2 (763111)
07-21-2015 8:14 AM


Give neo-atheist blowhard PZ Myers some credit: when he says it's wrong to tolerate nonsense, he doesn't just mean creationist numbnuttery. Myers also takes a dim view of the way people who affirm the validity of species evolution misrepresent it. In a lecture at the Center For Inquiry in LA earlier this year, he took aim at bad evolutionary biology that equates adaptation with evolution.
So you say natural selection is the driving force behind species evolution? That traits or features in living organisms have each been selected for in a vast, ongiong, billion-year-old tournament between selfish genes? In that case, Myers wants a word with you.

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (763138)
07-21-2015 12:09 PM


Thread Copied to Creation/Evolution Miscellany Forum
Thread copied to the PZ Myers vs. Adaptationism thread in the Creation/Evolution Miscellany forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023