Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9094 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Post Volume: Total: 901,867 Year: 12,979/6,534 Month: 262/2,210 Week: 203/390 Day: 9/50 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality and Evo, Creo, and ID
lokiare
Member (Idle past 3083 days)
Posts: 69
Joined: 03-18-2014


Message 1 of 2 (722718)
03-24-2014 2:41 PM


So if homosexuality doesn't fit into evolution why is it here at all? Wouldn't it have been evolved out by now?
Is homosexuality a choice or is it some biological process. If it is a biological process it should have been eradicated by evolution right?
If it is not a biological process and a result of choice and environment then it shouldn't be protected under the law any more than any other choice/environment option (like say vegetarianism). So which side does it fall under and what are the scientific and lawful implications?
I put forward several studies that have been done that show homosexuality is more by choice and environment and falls under a mindset rather than a biological imperative or being of genetic origin:
Science Shows That Homosexuals Are Not "Born That Way."
What are your thoughts, counter evidence (but not inflammatory or insulting responses)?
Edited by lokiare, : Grammar.

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (722723)
03-24-2014 3:00 PM


Thread Copied to Creation/Evolution Miscellany Forum
Thread copied to the Homosexuality and Evo, Creo, and ID thread in the Creation/Evolution Miscellany forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022