Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 58 (9200 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Allysum Global
Post Volume: Total: 919,252 Year: 6,509/9,624 Month: 87/270 Week: 0/83 Day: 0/12 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1631 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 1 of 4 (718359)
02-06-2014 12:09 PM


Ken Ham in his debate with Bill Nye said we need to break science into two parts
  1. "Observational Science" -- where scientific experiments can be conducted in real time with testable predictions, etc etc ... referring to the application of the scientific method through the use of our senses and what we can measure, etc, and
  2. "Historical Science" -- where experiments cannot be conducted in the past and thus cannot be properly tested ... and therefore -- according to creationists -- the scientific method cannot be used and results\observations cannot be taken as evidence.
And he wants us to discard "historical science" because "you weren't there"
Or something like that (feel free to correct me if I have misrepresented this).
So what is real science and do these two distinctions above really apply to sciences like paleontology and geology?
quote:
Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge"[1]) is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. ...
In modern usage, "science" most often refers to a way of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself. It is also often restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the phenomena of the material universe. ...
Certainty and science
A scientific theory is empirical, and is always open to falsification if new evidence is presented. That is, no theory is ever considered strictly certain as science accepts the concept of fallibilism. ...
Scientific method - Wikipedia
quote:
The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. ...
The chief characteristic which distinguishes the scientific method from other methods of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself, supporting a theory when a theory's predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its predictions prove false. Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methods of obtaining knowledge. ...
Edited by RAZD, : ..
Edited by RAZD, : per comment

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 02-06-2014 12:54 PM RAZD has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13103
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 4 (718365)
02-06-2014 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
02-06-2014 12:09 PM


I don't think you can characterize historical science as an invention of creationists, see for example the paper cited by Roxrkool, Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science.
--Percy

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 12:09 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 1:16 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1631 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 3 of 4 (718369)
02-06-2014 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
02-06-2014 12:54 PM


understood. the part for the creationists is the "you weren't there" precept.
now revised for clarity
Edited by RAZD, : .

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 02-06-2014 12:54 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13103
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 4 of 4 (718374)
02-06-2014 1:25 PM


Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science. thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024