Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: The Rutificador chile
Post Volume: Total: 919,498 Year: 6,755/9,624 Month: 95/238 Week: 12/83 Day: 3/9 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The expected evidence of a one year duration “Great Flood” (ROUGH DRAFT STAGE)
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3971
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 7.1


(3)
Message 1 of 4 (635986)
10-03-2011 3:22 PM


THIS IS JUST A BEGINNING DRAFT TO SHOW THE MEMBERSHIP THAT I HAVE SOMETHING IN THE WORKS. CONSIDERABLE MODIFICATION IS YET TO COME.
PLEASE, DO NOT YET PROMOTE THIS TO OPEN DEBATE
This topic is an extension of the Potential Evidence for a Global Flood topic. Specific reference points in that topic might be ICANT’s message 317 and my message 316. That topic was then in the summary messages only stage and is now closed.
The intended framing of this discussion:
1 — This is not intended as a young Earth or old Earth issue, but I will set it in the mainstream old Earth frame. The main time constraint is that it was a 1 year flood event.
2 — This presumes the rained for 40 days and 40 nights and the fountains of the deep. The source of the water and the disposal of the water are presented as unexplained miracles, and are not issues in this topic. Yes, I know that is an unrealistic presumption, but so be it.
The standard perspective from both the creation and evolution side is that The Great Flood would have some sort of significant impact on the geologic record.
To mainstream geology, the vast thickness and complexity of the so called geologic column is much of the evidence of the Earth being far older that the young Earth creationist (YEC) perspective. The creation side in turn tends to attribute this vastness and complexity as being a product of the flood. I believe that the roots of this YEC perspective is not so much the desire to use the geologic column to support the reality of the flood, but rather to use the flood to explain the reality of the geologic column.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 10-12-2011 10:52 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3971
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 7.1


Message 2 of 4 (637032)
10-12-2011 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Minnemooseus
10-03-2011 3:22 PM


Hopelessly stalled - Anyone want to take over this theme?
I'm facing up to the reality that I'm not soon going to complete this opening message.
So, another is welcome to take or not take my ideas and create their own PNT.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Minnemooseus, posted 10-03-2011 3:22 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13108
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 3 of 4 (637070)
10-13-2011 9:19 AM


Adopt a Thread
Moose wants to know if anyone would like to take over this PNT. A thread discussing what the evidence for a geologically very recent flood would like that would be pretty interesting. If you want to take over this thread proposal please send me a PM. Or just propose your own thread.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Admin
Director
Posts: 13108
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 4 of 4 (637081)
10-13-2011 10:20 AM


Thread Has Been Adopted
Coyote will be taking over this topic, he's started a new PNT over at Evidence for a recent flood.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024