A question I've asked repeatedly and never gotten a response is:
"Even if ID was true, is there any value to the concept of a Designer beyond a historical footnote or in the case of Product Liability suits?"
Yeah, it's interesting to point out the tail fins were designed by Harley Earl and that Bill Mitchell had an entirely different point of view, or in the case of obviously piss poor design having an individual that can be held responsible for compensation.
But other than those two specific areas, historical footnotes and product liability, is there any other value to Intelligent Design?
likely in Intelligent Design please
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!