Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution: Trid and True
Katabhn
Guest


Message 1 of 9 (22321)
11-12-2002 2:21 AM


I like evolution. I juts makes sense. Transiteonals, morpholigical body types, genetic drift, natural selection...it all just fits together. Why is even any more argement about it?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by TrueCreation, posted 11-12-2002 5:42 PM You have not replied
 Message 6 by thousands_not_billions, posted 01-16-2003 11:20 PM You have not replied

     
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 9 (22385)
11-12-2002 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Katabhn
11-12-2002 2:21 AM


"I like evolution. I juts makes sense. Transiteonals, morpholigical body types, genetic drift, natural selection...it all just fits together. Why is even any more argement about it? "
--I like evolution too, the most interesting topic of study in my opinion. I in the most part prefer evolutionary geology though.
--I think you mean phylogenetically implied morphologies? What is a Transiteonal? Do you mean 'transitional'? I do not take up the argument, even as a YEC, that 'transitionals don't exist'. It is in my opinion, a sophists argument. And genetic drift & natural selection are not processes which take macro-evolutionary steps to have an effect on populations. So I'm sure your use of the word evolution here can be summed up as none other than a change in allelomorphic frequencies over time. Anyone who has studied evolution does not argue against this, Young or Old earther.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Katabhn, posted 11-12-2002 2:21 AM Katabhn has not replied

  
Katabhn
Guest


Message 3 of 9 (22584)
11-13-2002 8:57 PM


Do not insult my speling, it is an ad hominum attack and means that you should lose immediately. If you wish to actually discus this, plese use lanuage free of attacks that only stupid people would make.

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by mark24, posted 11-13-2002 9:21 PM You have not replied
 Message 5 by TrueCreation, posted 11-15-2002 4:36 PM You have not replied

     
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 4 of 9 (22586)
11-13-2002 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Katabhn
11-13-2002 8:57 PM


Katabhn,
My spelling leaves much to be desired, too, as does my punctuation. Have you considered running stuff through a spell checker before posting? It makes it easier for all concerned, & lends greater credibility to your posts.
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Katabhn, posted 11-13-2002 8:57 PM Katabhn has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 9 (22886)
11-15-2002 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Katabhn
11-13-2002 8:57 PM


"Do not insult my speling, it is an ad hominum attack and means that you should lose immediately. If you wish to actually discus this, plese use lanuage free of attacks that only stupid people would make."
--No insultation exists in my first post, I seriously had the impression that you did not actually mean 'transitional' for the first minute or two of writing the post. You can respond to my post again if you like, seeing it in this new light.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Katabhn, posted 11-13-2002 8:57 PM Katabhn has not replied

  
thousands_not_billions
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 9 (29326)
01-16-2003 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Katabhn
11-12-2002 2:21 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Katabhn:
I like evolution. I juts makes sense. Transiteonals, morpholigical body types, genetic drift, natural selection...it all just fits together. Why is even any more argement about it?
Oh well, each to his own. Creation makes much more sense to me I'm afraid. ;-)
cheers Katabhn

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Katabhn, posted 11-12-2002 2:21 AM Katabhn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by TrueCreation, posted 01-18-2003 10:34 PM thousands_not_billions has not replied
 Message 8 by TrueCreation, posted 01-18-2003 10:45 PM thousands_not_billions has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 9 (29526)
01-18-2003 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by thousands_not_billions
01-16-2003 11:20 PM


"Oh well, each to his own. Creation makes much more sense to me I'm afraid. ;-)"
--Not to me, funny though how I would still consider myself a proponent of YECism? I think I remind myself of Gould sometimes. Theres more to be worked out within the YECists position than you may think or know, I've always maintained that "...YEC's need to begin working on their own hypothetical inconsistencies before criticizing the systematics of others, [in particular, the Theory of Evolution] though there is of course a critique where critique is due." From my description. We need good research, that there is so much to be done just makes it that much more exciting.
-------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by thousands_not_billions, posted 01-16-2003 11:20 PM thousands_not_billions has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 9 (29527)
01-18-2003 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by thousands_not_billions
01-16-2003 11:20 PM


You have indicated on your[?] site that you love to study Geology, Biology, Chemistry, History, Math, and Physics, and "have the ambition to become an amateur scientist, and hopefully will make some scientific discoveries". You may want to consider affiliating yourself with my organization? The OYSI. Read some of the pages there and think it over, if you mean what you say it is possible that you would be a nice addition.
-------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by thousands_not_billions, posted 01-16-2003 11:20 PM thousands_not_billions has not replied

  
Arachnid
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 9 (31019)
02-02-2003 2:08 AM


I used to be a creationist until i saw "X-men" That Cro Magnum character is one badass crime fighting machine....just kidding(U hope)

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024