Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is This an Indication of Design in Evolution?
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 1 of 2 (340787)
08-17-2006 10:53 AM


Here is a current article from Associated Press
Scientists link gene to human brain evolution
Updated Thu. Aug. 17 2006 8:42 AM ET
Associated Press
WASHINGTON -- Scientists believe they have found a key gene that helped the human brain evolve from our chimp-like ancestors.
In just a few million years, one area of the human genome seems to have evolved about 70 times faster than the rest of our genetic code.
It appears to have a role in a rapid tripling of the size of the brain's crucial cerebral cortex, according to an article published Thursday in the journal Nature.
Study co-author David Haussler, director of the Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said his team found strong but still circumstantial evidence that a certain gene, called HAR1F, may provide an important answer to the question: "What makes humans brainier than other primates?" Human brains are triple the size of chimp brains.
Looking at 49 areas that have changed the most between the human and chimpanzee genomes, Haussler zeroed in on an area with "a very dramatic change in a relatively short period of time."
That one gene didn't exist until 300 million years ago and is present only in mammals and birds, not fish or animals without backbones.
But then it didn't change much at all. There are only two differences in that one gene between a chimp and a chicken, Haussler said.
But there are 18 differences in that one gene between human and chimp and they all seemed to occur in the development of man, he said.
Andrew Clark, a Cornell University professor molecular biology who was not part of Haussler's team, said that if true, the change in genes would be fastest and most dramatic in humans and would be "terrifically exciting."
However, the gene changed so fast that Clark said that he has a hard time believing it unless something unusual happened in a mutation. It's not part of normal evolution, he said. Haussler attributed the dramatic change to the stress of man getting out of trees and walking on two feet.
And it's not just that this gene changed a lot. There is also its involvement with the cerebral cortex, which is responsible for some of the more complex brain functions, including language and information processing.
"It looks like in fact it is important in the development of brain," said co-author Sofie Salama, a research biologist at Santa Cruz who led the efforts to identify where the gene is active in the body.
The scientists still don't know specifically what the gene does. But they know that this same gene turns on in human fetuses at seven weeks after conception and then shuts down at 19 weeks, Haussler said.
I have no background in biology but I've never completely bought the explanations of why the evolutionary process has seemed so erratic. From a strictly common sense point of view it would seem to me that evolution would occur gradually and evenly throughout time if it was stictly a natural process with no external intervention.
Here is an article that has a biologist saying that the change was so rapid that he can't believe that something unusual happened in the mutation, and that it's not part of normal evolution.
It seems to me that this would at least make him think that just maybe there might be a metaphysical explanation. That in my view would seem like a reasonable POV but he then says that it must have been the stress of leaving the trees and walking on two legs.
Either there is a creator or there isn't. Is evolution part of a great design by a metaphysical designer or is it all random chance and natural selection. Is the evolutionary process manipulated along the way. There are intelligent people on both sides of all of these questions. It seems to me that Theists will often allow their biases to totally disregard very strong evidence that is contrary to some of their specific beliefs, (like evolution), but that Atheists do exactly the same thing as in this case.
It seems to me that instances like this would at least cause an atheistic biologist to consider the metaphysical even from a Deist POV.

Everybody is entitled to my opinion.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminJar, posted 08-17-2006 12:29 PM GDR has not replied

AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (340816)
08-17-2006 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
08-17-2006 10:53 AM


Duplicate thread
You and GDR posted about this news item at about the same time. Closing this one and pointing everyone towards Message 1.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by GDR, posted 08-17-2006 10:53 AM GDR has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024