To all:
I propose a thread which allows debaters and forum members to voice their concerns over:
1) Members making generalised and unsupported claims. (Like: "The bible has proof that it is the word of God. What evidence? It's obvious!")
2) Members making vague or seemingly irrelevant points while refusing to explain them (or explain them in an even more vague and irrelevant fashion)
3) Members leaving a thread in the middle of a discussion. (If members cannot make a refutation for a point made, they can: a) agree with their opponent's point of view, b) agree to disagree, c) continue to discuss, or d) apologise for their error. Under no circumstances should a member leave the discussion as a result of embarassment at having no refutation for the opponent's arguments. I consider this rude.)
(Note: this doesn't apply for members who are preoccupied with "getting a life". I think it is common courtesy (and many members have done this) to inform your opponent(s) that you would be away or busy in the future, and so would be unable to reply for a period of time.)
(Note also: this doesn't apply to "newbies" because according to one source, they (apparently) tend to come and go as they please. So if your opponent left and never came back, forget it)
4) Members selectively ignoring points. (If you have given a refutation against point A, your refutation gets ignored, and then several posts later your opponent brings up point A again and asserts that you have not refuted it. Repeat n times.)
*******************************************************************
If any of the above has happened to you (or is happening to you), I suggest you copy and paste your unanswered questions, ignored points, or some evidence that your opponent is around (e.g. arguing in another forum/thread) but vanished from your discussion, to this thread, and then NOTIFY YOU OPPONENT THAT YOU HAVE DONE SO (very important).
If you are the individual accused of the above practices, but you believe you have a legitimate reason (e.g. posts too complex for points to be identified, points were accidentally overlooked, communication problems, time constraints, claim made was legitimate but to explain it would be off-topic, etc.) then you may explain yourself here.
I don't intend this to be a long term thread for off-topic dicussion. Once the confusion has been sorted out, you and your opponenet may wish to return to your earlier thread to argue on the original topic. This thread is intended for sorting out confusion (as well as identifying shameful debating practices).