too intelligent to actually be intelligent?

In the recently closed thread 'True science follows the evidence wherever it leads (The design of the eye)- it was stated by
Crashfrog in message #37:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"If the best- the absolute, tip top best designs in the history
of design- is unable to match the complexity and effectiveness
of the human body, isn't it proof that it is too complex to have been designed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------Also stated by Chiroptera in message #38:----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The human body is far too complex to have been designed by a sentient entity"
----------------------------------------------------------------------Forget what he means by "sentient" for now- I am just dying
to know how a design can 1. be so complex as to rule out a designer
and 2. is so far beyond intelligent that it proves an accident is
the only logical explanation. Where I come from (called the real world), the more intelligent a design is the smarter it proves the designer is!! This is why we Creationsts call a person smart enough
to come up with a design as intelligent as the human body GOD!!!
I (still) CDESIGN

Thread copied to the too intelligent to actually be intelligent? thread in the Intelligent Design forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.