Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ratio of Deleterious Mutations to Beneficial Ones
PlanManStan
Member (Idle past 3687 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 12-12-2013


Message 1 of 2 (719288)
02-12-2014 6:59 PM


I was reading a paper (not necesarily the most formal thing you've ever seen, but a paper nontheless) which talked about a computer simulation called Mendel which, when the correct rates of muation, fraction of deleterious muatations, muation rate, selection efficiency, etc., it showed a trend of degeneration, leading to extinction. Do you think this poses a serious problem to evolutionary theory? I'm not well-versed in this kind of stuff (I'm an American high-school student, after all. I'm not well-versed in anything ).
Quote of the Paper I was talking about:
The user manual for
Mendel’s Accountant (http://www.mendelsaccountant.info)
describes in detail how to input all the relevant data
for different biological situations in the most honest
way possible. Mendel’s specific results depend on
the specific input data used. However the general
patterns which Mendel reveals are surprisingly
consistentas long as the input data which is
used is even remotely realistic biologically. These
general output patterns are revealed in the example
given below. In this particular example Mendel’s
human default parameters (see the user manual at
http://www.mendelsaccountant.info) are used, except for the
following exceptions: (a) the frequency of beneficial
mutations is increased 10,000-fold so that the ratio
of deleterious to beneficial is 9:1; (b) for simplicity, all
mutations are made co-dominant.
Although we use here the default mutation rate for
Mendel (which is presently set at ten new mutations
per individual per generation), there is growing
evidence that this should be set about one order of
magnitude higher. We presently use a mutation rate
of only ten just to be generous to evolutionary theory,
allowing for the notion that 90% of the genome might
be irrelevant junk DNA. If this example employed
the accepted human mutation rate (>100), the
degeneration described below would be much more
severe and extinction would be rapid. The default
selection pressure used in this example (six children
per female, four of which are selected away every
generation), represents extremely intense selection.

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 2 of 2 (719307)
02-13-2014 3:58 AM


Thread Copied to Biological Evolution Forum
Thread copied to the Ratio of Deleterious Mutations to Beneficial Ones thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024