|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Empirical study on tin foil hats | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
This is very interesting
Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason. So it was the goverment all along. Brothers and sisters take your tin foil hats. It was all a lie. http://berkeley.intel-research.net/arahimi/helmet/ Or nothttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqAX8n38EdI Who should we trust Coffe House please Edited by CoolBeans, : MORE LIES! Edited by CoolBeans, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 12998 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
I prefer the last study since it actually give us a demonstration of the blocking power of my shiny friend.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
I dont think Im well liked in here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genomicus Member (Idle past 1942 days) Posts: 852 Joined: |
From your first link:
Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason. So it was the goverment all along. Brothers and sisters take your tin foil hats. It was all a lie. Except that the last line of "We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason" is sarcasm.
I prefer the last study since it actually give us a demonstration of the blocking power of my shiny friend. I would hardly call a YouTube video a "study" on this subject.Furthermore, you can still read the results of the first link you posted, so there's no reason to "prefer" one over the other - except that the first link you posted was much more rigorous than that short YouTube video. It also has the advantage of being conducted by MIT inhabitants I have no idea why I'm spending my time on a subject as absurd as this... -.-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
This article made my day.
Edited by CoolBeans, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
Furthermore, you can still read the results of the first link you posted, so there's no reason to "prefer" one over the other - except that the first link you posted was much more rigorous than that short YouTube video. It also has the advantage of being conducted by MIT inhabitants
Of course there is a reason. This one supports my position.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genomicus Member (Idle past 1942 days) Posts: 852 Joined: |
Of course there is a reason. This one supports my position. That's not a logical reason. That's an emotional one. The YouTube video that "supports" your position isn't as rigorous as the article you linked to, so there's no reasonable way you can "prefer" the YouTube video. But then again, you never responded to that point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genomicus Member (Idle past 1942 days) Posts: 852 Joined: |
One more thing:
I dont think Im well liked in here. I will not pass judgment on whether you are well-liked here or not. However, I can say this: if you aren't "well-liked," it may very possibly be due to your own actions. The EvC members, in general, are a friendly group, so if you don't think you are well-liked here, do some introspection of your own. Edited by Genomicus, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
Holy shit! We are seriously discussing this.
I was going to type confirmation bias as the reason but I changed my mind. Edited by CoolBeans, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genomicus Member (Idle past 1942 days) Posts: 852 Joined: |
If this was meant as joking kind of discussion, then I fully concede that I fell for the trap and thought you were serious.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
It was not a trap...
Perhaps I should had been more obvious.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6408 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
I dont think Im well liked in here.
You come across as a bit erratic.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CoolBeans Member (Idle past 3615 days) Posts: 196 From: Honduras Joined: |
What do you mean with erratic?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024