Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A "Great Debate" for holmes vs. Rrhain?
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 1 of 6 (129327)
08-01-2004 12:56 PM


They've been sniping at each other at the " farenheit 9/11" topic, the most recent shot at message 270.
I think we need to get this into its own topic.
Adminnemooseus

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 6 (129810)
08-02-2004 1:25 PM


Should holmes and Rrhain be suspended from the coffee house for a while?
The off-topic sniping continues at the "farenheit 9/11" topic.
The most recent shot is here.
You two - consider this the official warning.
Adminnemooseus

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 08-02-2004 2:37 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-07-2004 8:27 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 477 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 3 of 6 (129821)
08-02-2004 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
08-02-2004 1:25 PM


Re: Should holmes and Rrhain be suspended from the coffee house for a while?
Well, at least spell Rrhain's name correctly if you want him to listen.
{OK - I got the "ia" turned into "ai" in the topic title - Adminnemooseus}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 08-02-2004 01:52 PM

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-02-2004 1:25 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5820 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 4 of 6 (131292)
08-07-2004 8:27 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
08-02-2004 1:25 PM


Re: Should holmes and Rrhain be suspended from the coffee house for a while?
At this point I want to point out that it has been at least two times now that I have stopped what I have been asked to stop by admins, only to have rrhain continue against first an admonishment and now an outright warning.
No action gets taken when he ignores admonishments, am I going to have to put up with him ignoring warnings as well? And then get equal blame when I respond to his posts which were in violation and no one does anything?
This message has been edited by holmes, 08-07-2004 07:38 AM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-02-2004 1:25 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-08-2004 2:20 AM Silent H has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 5 of 6 (131514)
08-08-2004 2:20 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Silent H
08-07-2004 8:27 AM


Re: Should holmes and Rrhain be suspended from the coffee house for a while?
Holmes, by citing two of your messages, my intent WAS NOT to pick on you. I was not blaming you, and excusing Rrhain. Your messages just happened to be the most recent of the conflict, at the times I looked at the situation.
Adminnemooseus

Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
Thread Reopen Requests

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-07-2004 8:27 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Silent H, posted 08-08-2004 5:20 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5820 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 6 of 6 (131532)
08-08-2004 5:20 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Adminnemooseus
08-08-2004 2:20 AM


Re: Should holmes and Rrhain be suspended from the coffee house for a while?
Although I did wonder about why it was my posts got linked, that wasn't what I was complaining about.
First Nosy asked us to cut out certain behavior which if my posts are looked at show I did, yet Rrhain's posts continued in fashion without any further comments from admins and so I eventually started sliding backward (though I was a bit more subdued).
In addition, I myself called for a great debate or a new thread, but Rrhain did not want this.
So I was surprised to find myself named as a person getting a warning along with Rrhain, along with a suggestion that I myself had already made. I scratched my head wondering what did I do?
Once warned by you, I did nothing further with Rrhain, but he has once again posted against me on that subject in that thread.
And what I am wondering is if I'm going to see him get away with it once again, or if no one does anything and I reply on that subject am I going to face the same sanction?
I agree it takes two to tango, but it only takes one side to continually break a cease fire. While I felt my initial shared "blame" was inequitable, I stayed quiet because I figured that was that. But I see I am able to be attacked anyway, which shows which side this is coming from, and so I am now calling foul.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-08-2004 2:20 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024