|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,806 Year: 4,063/9,624 Month: 934/974 Week: 261/286 Day: 22/46 Hour: 2/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Has evolution been proven ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5222 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Creationman,
The FACT that when you breed two dogs and continue to breed two dogs and let them breed with two more dogs etc. and then you stand back and take a look...you see that you started with dogs and ended with dogs. You can actually SEE the common ancestor of the dogs you bred!! All you've admitted is that dogs reproduce, let me be more specific;do you think all canines (foxes, wolves, etc) had a common ancestor? Mark [This message has been edited by mark24, 04-04-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 504 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
Where the freaking hell did you get this information from? Let me guess, you got this from some preacher somewhere without even looking it up. You mean to tell me that you've never digested non-organic matter before?
Repeat after me. Digestion of food has absolutely nothing to do with the DNA makeup of the food itself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
you've never digested non-organic matter before? now now, don't put salt on the wound ... we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: Here is a better test. Erase everyone's memories and burn every page that has writing on it. Which theory will be rediscovered, evolution or creationism? Evolution can be rediscovered since the evidence is in the ground and written in the DNA of organisms. Christian creationism can not be rediscovered since it is stringently supported by a book that would not be rediscovered.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 504 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
quote: I actually used this same argument last month to argue in a philosophy debate why art is more important than science.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SRO2  Inactive Member |
Most excellent!!! Can I use that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1531 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
creationman writes: It's fun?
then why are you and everybody else on these forums arguing with stubborn ignorant morons like me, as others have labled us?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 504 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
quote: Because if we remain passive in this matter, you people will eventually take over the world and force the rest of us to be as ignorant as you at gun point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SoulFire Inactive Member |
Christian creationism can not be rediscovered since it is stringently supported by a book that would not be rediscovered.
You're looking at this as though God is unable to talk to us, Christianity would be "rediscovered" with no problem because God is able to talk to His people. Only DNA is known to produce DNA. No chemical interaction of molecules has even come close to producing this ultra-complex code which is so essential to all known life.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 504 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
quote: Yes, but in modern days that usually resulted in mass suicides, snipings, or births of doomsday cults. The question is how do you know who God has spoken to and who are just plane crazy or power hungry?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SoulFire Inactive Member |
Yes, but in modern days that usually resulted in mass suicides, snipings, or births of doomsday cults. The question is how do you know who God has spoken to and who are just plane crazy or power hungry?
If we are still assuming this is after everyone's minds have been erased along with all printed pages burnt, and someone just started talking about God, then there would be really no way to know because no body else would have any knowledge of their own to argue with them. However, if we are speaking as of now, already with knowledge of God, and with the Bible as a resource, then if someone says they have been spoken to by God, then we must check it with the scriptures. If what the person says matches what the Bible says, and also comes to pass, then their message is most likely from God. There is, however, only one way to be certain that someone has really been spoken to by God, and that is for God to confirm it by revealing Himself to you through the Bible, prayer or circumstances. Only DNA is known to produce DNA. No chemical interaction of molecules has even come close to producing this ultra-complex code which is so essential to all known life.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SoulFire Inactive Member |
Thanks for the resources JonF, I'll be sure to study Thermodynamics whenever I can so that we may continue this debate after I have widened my knowledge of the subject.
Only DNA is known to produce DNA. No chemical interaction of molecules has even come close to producing this ultra-complex code which is so essential to all known life.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 195 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Good attitude.
You really should change your signature; it's false.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SoulFire Inactive Member |
That was already pointed out to me by Sylas and Percy, so of course I'll have to change it. How's this signature, any arguments against it?
[This message has been edited by SoulFire, 04-06-2004] During all recorded human history, there has never been a substantiated case of a living thing being produced from anything other than another living thing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hitchy Member (Idle past 5145 days) Posts: 215 From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh Joined: |
quote: How about the artificial creation of a bacteriophage? I know that viruses do not technically satisfy all of the requirements of life, but once put into a bacterium, the bacteriophage began to replicate. I'll get the site information for you in a bit... http://www.usatoday.com/...ce/2003-11-13-new-life-usat_x.htm (Web address added by edit) [This message has been edited by hitchy, 04-06-2004]
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024