Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Most Dangerous Individual To Ever Live
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 61 (93826)
03-22-2004 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Andya Primanda
03-22-2004 2:07 AM


Re: You missed my reply there?
I think we should continue this at that thread. In case you're waiting, I already replied there re:your jihad article link, and here's what I got to say if you missed it the first time around:
Yah, to keep the peace I guess it would be ok, but I need to make the point here that both Jesus and Mohammed prophesied eventual world dominance by their religions. The difference is how their followers were to achieve it. Jesus taught by word and example to evangelize without violence. Mohammed taught by word and example by violence and to FIGHT FOR THE CAUSE OF ALLAH. Did you count the number of times in the link that this phrase was used, most of them without reference to defensive action? This is what gave this man and his religion such a bloody history. I believe I needed to make this point in this thread in order to make my point. The shedding of blood percipitated by the doctrine of Jesus effected mostly the shedding of the blood of his own followers by those who rejected his clear instructions to love and do no violence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Andya Primanda, posted 03-22-2004 2:07 AM Andya Primanda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Andya Primanda, posted 03-23-2004 2:06 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 61 (94000)
03-22-2004 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Silent H
03-22-2004 1:19 AM


Iraq has Xians as well as muslims. Saddam's right hand man Tariq Aziz is Xian. Thus we fought a war with Xians too (if you are including Iraq). That was about despotism not fundamentalism.
No we fought no war with Christians in Iraq. That they were under an Islamic regime subject to Islamic rule does not mean we were fighting them. That's nonsense. Saddam likely need his closest man to be a Christian because he knew he could be fully trusted. (There, that oughta stir a rise!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Silent H, posted 03-22-2004 1:19 AM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by nator, posted 09-12-2004 11:27 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024