Nope,
not if Faraday's use of "contiguous" for something > cm is explained by a use of info that is NOT a tape transmitted AND ATTand is superfluous in the any one of multiple sense inRussel that vonWeisacker URed or is another appeareance of age for Boole in addition to what I said and quoted wrote"In the last example, what we had really to express was "Metals, except hard, not elastic, metals." Conjunctions used between ADJECTIVES are usually superfluous,and, therefore, must not be expressed symbolically."p57 (an investigation of the laws of thought).
Ask for my channel 13 Time Warner Pegysus videos if you want to see where else I have posed the issue of "symbol" outside of Romans.For this to be "yes" than first nope you MUST substitue Maxwell's use of the word "mild" into any old Russel "sense" which may only math when not unify which 0s and 1s are good for. MILD IS THE ADJECTIVE FOR ANY SHAPE THAT IS CONTIGUOUS IN THIS FORMAL SENSE.
------
water rolls down hills.