Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Something From Nothing?
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1503 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 121 of 124 (88426)
02-24-2004 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by :æ:
02-24-2004 4:46 PM


That darn uncertainty principal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by :æ:, posted 02-24-2004 4:46 PM :æ: has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by :æ:, posted 02-24-2004 5:15 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
:æ: 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7184 days)
Posts: 423
Joined: 07-23-2003


Message 122 of 124 (88431)
02-24-2004 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by 1.61803
02-24-2004 5:04 PM


lol... actually I don't know if the argument has much to do with the uncertainty principle, and in fact there might be a resolution to this computational dilemna "hiding" somewhere in the uncertainty principle and quantum computing. All of that's still pretty speculative at this point however, but I think it's important to note that the argument defines computation classically and that there is a real difference between classical computation and quantum computation -- none that I know of that would immediately resolve our intractible triad, but like I said... it might be possible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by 1.61803, posted 02-24-2004 5:04 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5032 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 123 of 124 (88631)
02-25-2004 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by crashfrog
02-24-2004 4:40 PM


dont touch the frog.
Nope,
not if Faraday's use of "contiguous" for something > cm is explained by a use of info that is NOT a tape transmitted AND ATTand is superfluous in the any one of multiple sense inRussel that vonWeisacker URed or is another appeareance of age for Boole in addition to what I said and quoted wrote"In the last example, what we had really to express was "Metals, except hard, not elastic, metals." Conjunctions used between ADJECTIVES are usually superfluous,and, therefore, must not be expressed symbolically."p57 (an investigation of the laws of thought).
Ask for my channel 13 Time Warner Pegysus videos if you want to see where else I have posed the issue of "symbol" outside of Romans.For this to be "yes" than first nope you MUST substitue Maxwell's use of the word "mild" into any old Russel "sense" which may only math when not unify which 0s and 1s are good for. MILD IS THE ADJECTIVE FOR ANY SHAPE THAT IS CONTIGUOUS IN THIS FORMAL SENSE.
------
water rolls down hills.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by crashfrog, posted 02-24-2004 4:40 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
V-Bird
Member (Idle past 5584 days)
Posts: 211
From: Great Britain
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 124 of 124 (93982)
03-22-2004 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
12-30-2003 4:06 AM


1. Matter is simply energy bound by the four forces, so everything stemmed from pure energy.
2. On a globe that had millions of years and billions of attempts to try to construct the primitive replicator one of which finally worked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 12-30-2003 4:06 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024