Hi there,
(Message from a Paleontology student)
I'm too young in this forum to catch all the enclosed discussion subtleties.
My choice is to throw small messages in a bottle, and wait someone to reply.
From this forum, but in another topic, I had recently confirmation that I have nothing related with creationism in my investigation methods.
Evolutionists base their investigation on assumption of potential truth and conversely, creationists theories are based on false certainty. Both are necessary in the mutual research of potential truth. This is a philosophic problem, strongly conditioned by education.
If there were no more creationism though, I'm convinced that evolutionism will derive and loose gradually he's integrity.
I can assess my idea. Here (Western Europe) we have 2000 years of "decent" history.
Across Atlantic, there are not more than 200 years.
I believe that mot of the new creationists have evident memory problems. To avoid being partial in my argument, I suggest that they googlize the word inquisition and choose any
webpages they want. Inquisition was one of the worse ideologic derive of a monopolistic evolutionarism rejection based system. Opposition thought ("false" doctrines) were eliminate, people persecuted, burned alive ect.
The aim of my speech is to underscore the common importance of these two opposite ideologies, both necessary joined, affecting and interacting, likely as an auto-regulated system. This is what I proposed the term of mutualism to qualify this association.
What do you think?
Denesha.