Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9229 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: USA Pharma Store
Post Volume: Total: 921,495 Year: 1,817/6,935 Month: 247/333 Week: 8/79 Day: 1/6 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are we so bad at this?
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 116 of 205 (922431)
03-07-2025 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Zucadragon
03-07-2025 6:56 AM


Re: Topic Reminder

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Zucadragon, posted 03-07-2025 6:56 AM Zucadragon has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 118 of 205 (922443)
03-09-2025 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Candle3
03-09-2025 4:14 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Remaining on topic, why do you think you’re not succeeding in convincing anyone?
—Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Candle3, posted 03-09-2025 4:14 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Candle3, posted 03-10-2025 8:12 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 128 of 205 (922464)
03-12-2025 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by Candle3
03-10-2025 8:12 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 119:
Percy writes in Message 118:
Remaining on topic, why do you think you’re not succeeding in convincing anyone?

It is really difficult to convince someone who already has his mind made up.
Isn't that true of everyone who has a firm opinion? Including you?
So given that you're trying to persuade someone who "has his mind made up", as do you, and given the information provided in Message 1, how best should you go about trying to persuade them? How well does your approach harmonize with those suggestions?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Candle3, posted 03-10-2025 8:12 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Candle3, posted 03-12-2025 3:27 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


(1)
Message 131 of 205 (922470)
03-12-2025 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Candle3
03-12-2025 3:27 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 129:
Me: Then why did you suggest that I am the only one who has an issue with convincing others?
Why do you think I suggested that?
If you go back and read Message 1 you'll see that it's explaining why it's so difficult for anyone to convince others. By trying to convince people here about evolution you've provided a useful example for discussion in this thread. Clearly you're not convincing anyone, so the obvious questions are how well does your current approach harmonize with the suggestions in Message 1, and given the information it provides, what approach do you think might work better?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Candle3, posted 03-12-2025 3:27 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Candle3, posted 03-13-2025 12:57 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 135 of 205 (922477)
03-13-2025 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Candle3
03-13-2025 12:57 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 134:
If the specified complexity of the cell cannot alter one's perception, nothing will. That individual is impervious to change.
Is this the approach that Message 1 suggests would work?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Candle3, posted 03-13-2025 12:57 PM Candle3 has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 141 of 205 (922496)
03-14-2025 7:45 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by dwise1
03-13-2025 3:47 PM


Re: Of What Are We Trying To Convince Others?
dwise1 writes in Message 138:
Note to Percy:
This question was intended to test an idea: How could we convince anyone of one thing if they think we're trying to convince them of something entirely different? More specifically, if the receiver suspects the sender's intentions, then the receiver will not be receptive to the message even to the point of completely blocking it out.
A real-world example, FEMA relief teams in recovery efforts after Hurricane Helene were met by strong resistance from locals, some of which threatened to turn violent. That was because of the spread of misinformation telling the locals that FEMA was trying to take their property away from them. In such a situation, there would be nothing that the FEMA teams could possibly say that would convince the locals to let them help them.
Hence, the built-in biases of the recipient would have an effect on getting a message across and would be something that the sender would not have any control over.
From the opening post:
Percy writes in Message 1:
A significant focus of the article is trust in science...
​...
So how to develop trust?
quote:
...by establishing a similarity of experience, which involved asking questions about the experiences of others and posting about one’s own illness experiences—at the correct moment, when it was relevant and resonant. Only in this way could they establish commonality.
Are there people for whom it isn't possible to find that "correct moment", who perhaps have too much invested to ever let their guard down? I think so.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by dwise1, posted 03-13-2025 3:47 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 142 of 205 (922497)
03-14-2025 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by Zucadragon
03-13-2025 6:10 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Zucadragon writes in Message 139:
Instead of answering what I asked for, you answer with a journalist's opinion, not a scientist, no scientific text, no nothing...
As Candle3 said in Message 100, he just Googled "Scientists who believe life leached from rocks". Of course he didn't find any scientists who believe anything like that, only results that included those words. And he left out that he also claimed that it is believed that consciousness also leached from rocks.
Concerning the journalist's quote, while leaching from rocks is is very common way for chemicals to dissolve or become suspended in water, it's not the only way. Many chemicals of life have been found on rocks in space, for instance the asteroid Bennu, on which there are amino acids and the bases that form nucleotides. In other words, it is not uncommon for the chemicals of life to just be sitting out there.
The particular way that the chemical constituents of the first life came to be in the right place at the right time is a minor matter. The elements comprising these chemicals are common throughout the solar system, including Earth, and they readily form organic chemicals. What matters is that the chemicals were present in a conducive environment. What were the chemicals, what was that environment, what was the process? We don't know.
While there is a great deal of research and speculation about abiogenesis, very little is actually known about it with any meaningful confidence. And, as you've been trying to point out, no scientist would ever say anything like "life and consciousness leached from a rock." (Candle3 in Message 63)
But Candle3 won't accept this information because the requisite trust is not there.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Zucadragon, posted 03-13-2025 6:10 PM Zucadragon has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 146 of 205 (922531)
03-17-2025 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Candle3
03-17-2025 3:18 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 145:
Also, that living organisms produce only more living things like themselves.
Really? I'll keep that in mind the next time I'm in the bathroom.
The topic is about how to persuade successfully. How well would you say your current approach is working?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Candle3, posted 03-17-2025 3:18 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Candle3, posted 03-17-2025 7:37 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 150 of 205 (922538)
03-18-2025 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by Candle3
03-17-2025 7:37 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 147:
Percy, atheists are not doing very well when it comes to
persuading creationists to accept their worldview.
If by "worldview" you mean the opposing views about whether God exists, then yes, I'd agree with you, but I'd add to it and say that neither side is making much headway in persuading the other. Do you think the approach described in Message 1 would work?
Where Message 1 describes an online discussion group, one of the things I'd question is whether the number of upvotes really has anything to do with persuasion. It might just mean it pissed off the least number of people, or that it was thought effective by people who already agreed with it.
I don't think inoffensiveness leads to persuasion. It might lead to friendship, but not persuasion. I have conservative friends and we'll never agree about politics, but politics isn't why we're friends.
As noted in Message 1, burying people in facts, or in your case innuendo, insults, questionable assertions and lies, doesn't work. Scorn only makes it worse.
So the question remains: How best to make progress in persuading people of your point of view? Or maybe persuasion isn't your goal. Maybe just denigrating other people and views makes your day.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Candle3, posted 03-17-2025 7:37 PM Candle3 has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 164 of 205 (922563)
03-20-2025 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Candle3
03-19-2025 6:05 PM


Re: No Grant Money for Apologetics
Candle3 writes in Message 153:
Stop pretending to be ignorant. Neither the government nor our universities give grant money to the Christian scientists who try to prove creation.
Still not the topic, but anyway, flat-earthers and astrologers don't receive grant money, either. Science grants go to people and groups doing science.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Candle3, posted 03-19-2025 6:05 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:13 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 165 of 205 (922564)
03-20-2025 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by Candle3
03-20-2025 2:38 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 157:
The Constitution says nothing about the "separation of church and state."
First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 2:38 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by dwise1, posted 03-20-2025 7:19 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 168 by dwise1, posted 03-20-2025 7:44 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 170 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:07 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 166 of 205 (922565)
03-20-2025 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by Candle3
03-20-2025 3:41 PM


Re: No Grant Money for Apologetics
Candle3 writes in Message 160:
And this from a man who believes that the simple cell, which is more specifically complicated beyond anything our minds can comprehend, created itself.
Still not the topic, but no one in science believes this.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 3:41 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:03 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 172 of 205 (922571)
03-20-2025 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by Candle3
03-20-2025 8:03 PM


Re: No Grant Money for Apologetics
Candle3 writes in Message 169:
Exactly what is it that no one in science believes?
The absurd part of what you said, that the cell created itself.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:03 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Candle3, posted 03-21-2025 9:17 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 173 of 205 (922572)
03-20-2025 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Candle3
03-20-2025 8:07 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Candle3 writes in Message 170:
Read it again. It supports what I said.
No, it doesn't.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:07 PM Candle3 has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23334
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 174 of 205 (922573)
03-20-2025 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Candle3
03-20-2025 8:13 PM


Re: No Grant Money for Apologetics
Candle3 writes in Message 171:
A Christian who places his faith in Jesus will not trust in astrology. I am not concerned with those who believes the earth is flat. It has nothing to do with me.
What flat-earthers and astrologers have in common with creationists is that none of them are doing science. Science grants go to people and groups who are doing science.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Candle3, posted 03-20-2025 8:13 PM Candle3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by Candle3, posted 03-21-2025 9:22 AM Percy has not replied
 Message 194 by Candle3, posted 03-28-2025 9:33 AM Percy has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025