Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 45 (9233 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChemEngrMBA
Post Volume: Total: 921,678 Year: 2,000/6,935 Month: 124/306 Week: 56/47 Day: 0/5 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Review and Confirm The Mathematical Proof of God
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 76 of 314 (921544)
01-15-2025 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by KING IYK
01-15-2025 2:54 PM


I don't think you're listening. Discussion is a two way street, not a monologue. You're repeating the same thing over and over, no matter whether it makes any sense or what feedback is given you.
Maybe we should talk about something else. Can you tell us a little about yourself? What part of the world are you from? What branch of Christianity? What kind of work do you do or are you still in school?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by KING IYK, posted 01-15-2025 2:54 PM KING IYK has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10469
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 77 of 314 (921545)
01-15-2025 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by KING IYK
01-15-2025 2:54 PM


KI writes:
You should wonder why The Cross fits perfectly into The Time Clock.
It doesn't fit into the Time Clock. I already disproved that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by KING IYK, posted 01-15-2025 2:54 PM KING IYK has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9702
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 78 of 314 (921546)
01-15-2025 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by KING IYK
01-15-2025 2:47 PM


King IVK writes:
Revelation 13:18 | Isaiah 14:14 ; within the context of this proof, you will get a reward if you could put those two verses together, and decipher it's meaning.
Isn't it obvious? God is frightened, he's being deposed by the greater god.
Of course it's only Yahweh who's one of the lessor gods anyway, I suspect he went crying to his dad El.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by KING IYK, posted 01-15-2025 2:47 PM KING IYK has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8748
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.7


(3)
Message 79 of 314 (921547)
01-15-2025 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by KING IYK
01-15-2025 2:44 PM


Re: The TRVTH
However, you find into impossible to highlight the flaw in the proof.
What proof? I see no proof. I see a statement of faith.
Your emotional wannabees do not constitute any proof. You present nothing but your personal interpretation of the cosmic meanings of strings of numbers conceived in the minds of men. You show nothing that proves god, nothing that shows divinity.
Like Louis Farrakhan's, your numerology is self-serving, self-devised, deceitful and false.
[9] There, in the middle of this mall is the Washington Monument, 555 feet high. But if we put a 1 in front of that 555 feet, we get 1555, the year that our first fathers landed on the shores of Jamestown, Virginia as slaves. In the background is the Jefferson and Lincoln Memorial, each one of these monuments is 19 feet high.
[10] Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth president. Thomas Jefferson, the third president, and 16 and 3 make 19 again. What is so deep about this number 19? Why are we standing on the Capitol steps today? That number 19! When you have a nine, you have a womb that is pregnant. And when you have a one standing by the nine, it means that there’s something secret that has to be unfolded.
--Source
Like Farrakhan's, your attempt to hold numerology as devine fails. You show no evidence that numbers of any sort are any more than the intellectual conjures of men as mathematical tools. 666 is a number not an evil power.
The divinity you see is only the emotions within your own head. They do not transcend that material boundary. You have no evidence, no matter how small, that such a thing as "devine" can even exist outside your imagination, outside your fantasies.
In humans, an insistence that your fantasy world is real and that you and all others must hear, obey and believe is considered a mental defect requiring not just professional treatment but public vigilance notice and behavior monitoring. Get some help.

“There’s simply no polite way to tell people they’ve dedicated their lives to an illusion,”
-Daniel Dennett
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by KING IYK, posted 01-15-2025 2:44 PM KING IYK has not replied

  
KING IYK
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: 01-08-2025


Message 80 of 314 (921550)
01-16-2025 11:20 AM


Definition of Concepts:
The Holy Trinity:
A single God existing as three identical entities. In the concept of The Trinity, Three and One are the same.
Trinity of Numbers:
A single number existing as three identical entities.
Digital Root:
The single digit and ultimate unit number derived by the iterative process of summing the individual digits of a number.
ILLUSTRATIONS
2023 » 2 + 0 + 2 + 3 = 7
30 » 3 + 0 = 3
1191993 » 1+1+9+1+9+9+3 = 33 » 3 + 3 = 6
The Proof is comprised of 7 segments:
1. The Magnificence of 3,6,9: The Trinity of Numbers: Proves The Holy Trinity to be True by way of Mathematics
2. Time & Space: Proves The Triune God to be The creator of Time, Space, and The Universe
3. The Word: Proves The Bible to be The Word of God
4 & 5.The Image and The Earth: Proves The Triune God is The Creator of Man and all living creatures
6.Order & Peace: Proves the orderly nature of The Triune God as revealed in The scriptures.
7.The First & The Last: Proves The Triune God is who He says He is.
All segments answer the questions Man has pondered upon, especially on origin and purpose.
The Proof begins by deriving the Holy Trinity (3 3 3) through the Trinity of Numbers then proceeds to illustrate how The Holy Trinity (3 3 3) proves consistent in all 7 segments.
1. The Magnificence of 3,6,9: The Trinity of Numbers:
The Digital Root of any Trinity of Numbers united into an integer is either 3, 6 , or 9.
111 » 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
222 » 2 + 2 + 2 = 6
333 » 3 + 3 + 3 = 9
444 » 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 » 1 + 2 = 3
555 » 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 » 1 + 5 = 6
666 » 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 » 1 + 8 = 9
777 » 7 + 7 + 7 = 21 » 2 + 1 = 3
888 » 8 + 8 + 8 = 24 » 2 + 4 =6
999 » 9 + 9 + 9 = 27 » 2 + 7 = 9
The recurring sequence 3 6 9 is magnificent for its representation of
The Truth: THE HOLY TRINITY !!! 3 3 3
3, 6, and 9 are part of the sequence of numbers obtained by adding 3 repeatedly
3 + 3 (6) + 3 (9) | 3 3 3 (See Proof for full illustration)
The Holy Trinity is assigned the numerical value
3 3 3 and Satan is self-assigned 6 6 6.[Revelation 13:18]
When you incorporate Isaiah 14:14 [which states: "I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High"] into this wonder, the reason for Satan's choice of 6 6 6 becomes overly glaring: He aims to be like God.
Romans 5:6: "For while we were still weak, at the right TIME Christ died for the ungodly."
When The Cross is fixed into a Time Clock, the co-ordinates are 3 6 9 and 12. The Cross is comprised of three entities:
3, 6, 9 - each representing an entity of the Trinity respectively, and a single head that unifies all three (The GodHead\God = 12; 1 Corinthians 11:3).
God is an ULTIMATE UNIT existing in eternity as Three distinct Entities in The Name of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit.
When all three entities are united to become an ULTIMATE UNIT(a single digit) by deriving the digital root of the sum and the digital root of the unifying Godhead\God is derived, the result is:
The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit =
3 + 6 + 9 = 18 » 1 + 8 = 9
God = 12 » 1 + 2 = 3
The Father + The Son + The Holy Spirit = 9;
God = 3
The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 9
9 is comprised of three 3s. 9 ≡ 3 3 3 i.e. a single God existing as three identical entities.
9 represents the three members of the trinity and 3 represents God. It means there are three individuals who are God in 9-The Trinity.
3 3 3; each 3 representing an entity of The Trinity:
God The Father, God The Son, God The Holy Spirit
2. TIME & SPACE
The Earth is the Third of Nine Planets.
The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 9.
9 is comprised of three 3s: 3 3 3
3. THE WORD
The Bible is comprised of The New Testament and The Old Testament. The Old Testament is comprised of 39 books while The New Testament is comprised of 27 books.
The New Testament : 27 (3 3 3)
The Old Testament : 39 (3 and 9; 9 is comprised of three 3s; 333)
4&5: THE IMAGE
Man was created in the image of God- A Trinity.
When The Cross is fixed into a Time Clock, Man is depicted as having three distinct parts 1, 2, 3 ; reach represented by 3, 6, 9 respectively (see proof for full illustration)
1 and 3 are the same (both hands)-a representation of The Holy Trinity.
1 and 3 are also represented by 3 and 9 in the Time Clock; 9 is comprised of three 3s: 3 3 3 (See Proof for full illustration)
6. ORDER & PEACE [1 Corinthians 14:33]
The Triune Number 9 acts as a guardian of order in the digital root system, providing structure, predictability, and balance.
When a number is multiplied by 9, the digital root of the product will be 9.
9 x 20 = 180; 1 + 8 + 0 = 9;
9 x 30 = 270; 2 + 7 + 0 = 9;
9 x 40 = 360; 3 + 6 + 0 = 9;
9 is comprised of three 3s; 3 3 3
7. THE FIRST & THE LAST [Revelation 22:13]
Man was designed to use the Base 10 Numeral System.
Consisting of 10 digits:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
1 is The First or The Beginning Number and The Triune Number 9 is The Highest or The Last.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [3 3 3]
⇛God is The First and He is The Last.
⇛He is The Beginning and He is The End.
⇛He is One and He is a Trinity.
There are 27 letters in the alphabets.
A [1]
B C D E F G H I J K
L M N O P Q R
S T U V W
X Y Z
&[27] (3 3 3)
⇛God is The Alpha & The Omega.
⇛He is The Beginning & The End.
⇛He is One and He is a Trinity.
Put mind to task and examine the evidence. When done, you will be left with two choices: Proclaim this Proof to be The Truth or declare me The Greatest Mathematician The World has ever seen.
Checkmate!!!

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by dwise1, posted 01-16-2025 12:27 PM KING IYK has not replied
 Message 84 by PaulK, posted 01-16-2025 1:17 PM KING IYK has not replied
 Message 86 by dwise1, posted 01-16-2025 2:10 PM KING IYK has replied
 Message 87 by AZPaul3, posted 01-16-2025 8:50 PM KING IYK has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 81 of 314 (921551)
01-16-2025 12:02 PM


Nonsense said twice is still nonsense.
--Percy

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Tangle, posted 01-16-2025 12:18 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9702
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 82 of 314 (921552)
01-16-2025 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Percy
01-16-2025 12:02 PM


Maybe he has to say it 3 times. Or nine. (God forbid.)

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Percy, posted 01-16-2025 12:02 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 6291
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 83 of 314 (921553)
01-16-2025 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by KING IYK
01-16-2025 11:20 AM


Digital Root:
The single digit and ultimate unit number derived by the iterative process of summing the individual digits of a number.
Not biblical. And most certainly does not have anything to do with Judaism or Christianity ... at least with Christianity prior to Muslim influence on Christian culture.
Your "Mathematical Proof of the Christian God" depends completely on Hinduism. Vishnu! Or at least on Hindu digits and positional notation, which we call "Arabic numerals" since it was the Arabs who passed that Hindu numbering system to us after having adopted it themselves.
And we didn't even start to adopt it until the 10th Century, coincident with our contact with the Arabs through the Crusades. Before then, Europe used Roman numerals, in which letters are assigned numeric values and then used to represent numbers. That same practiced was used earlier around the Mediterranean; eg, Greek numerals which assigns numeric values to the Greek alphabet, Hebrew alphabet doing the same (eg, go to your local Jewish items shop for a clock with the hours labeled with Hebrew letters).
For that matter, we didn't even know about ZERO until the Arabs introduced that Hindu concept to us. A documentary reenactment of that event between a Moor and a Spanish Christian always comes to mind:
Spaniard: "¿Qué es eso?"
Moor: "Es un cero."
Spaniard: "¿Qué es un cero?"
Moor: "Nada."
Spaniard: "¡¿Qué?!"
Indeed, as I discussed in my 2000 page, DWise1's Millennium Page, the new millennium started with 01 Jan 2001, not 2000, because the Anno Domini system does not have a Year Zero. Because in 525 CE Dionysius Exiguous (Dennis the Short) had no inkling of the concept of zero.
For that matter, you yourself keep using the Pagan Hindu ZERO. How unChristian of you!
So for your numerology to have any hope at all to accomplish what you want it to, you should be using Greek or Hebrew numerals (I personally question how appropriate Roman numerals would be) AND MOST DEFINITELY NOT "PAGAN" HINDU NUMERALS.
And yet you choose to reject biblical systems in order to depend entirely on a Pagan system. Wow!
Checkmate!!!
Really? Do you really think so? Wow!
What is it called when someone checkmates himself? Something like shooting himself in the foot and then boasting about his "incredible marksmanship".
 
I have advised countless creationists to do this, but they never do. I will offer you that same advice even though I do not doubt that you will also reject it. My minister (UU) told me I shouldn't cast pearls before swine, but here I go again:
LEARN SOMETHING! And THINK!
But you never will.
 

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by KING IYK, posted 01-16-2025 11:20 AM KING IYK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Percy, posted 01-16-2025 1:54 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 18143
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 6.0


Message 84 of 314 (921555)
01-16-2025 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by KING IYK
01-16-2025 11:20 AM


quote:
Put mind to task and examine the evidence. When done, you will be left with two choices: Proclaim this Proof to be The Truth or declare me The Greatest Mathematician The World has ever seen.
Or we could just laugh at your arrogance and false pride. You certainly haven’t any mathematical skill.
Consider:
quote:
The Digital Root of any Trinity of Numbers united into an integer is either 3, 6 , or 9.
Or to put it another way, if you multiply a single digit number by three you get - a multiple of three! I suppose I could give you credit for being able to manage simple addition but then I remember that you plagiarised that part, so I honestly can’t even do that.
No, you’re not a mathematician at all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by KING IYK, posted 01-16-2025 11:20 AM KING IYK has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 85 of 314 (921556)
01-16-2025 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by dwise1
01-16-2025 12:27 PM


dwise1 writes in Message 83:
Checkmate!!!
Really? Do you really think so? Wow!
What is it called when someone checkmates himself? Something like shooting himself in the foot and then boasting about his "incredible marksmanship".
This self-immolation reminds me of when I pulled this off against a cocky 1700 (he knew I was unrated) at the 1968 National High School at the McAlpin Hotel in New York City. I only know American notation, sorry, gave up chess before the switch to algebraic notation:
WhiteBlack
1.P-K4P-K4
2.N-KB3N-KB3
3.NxPNxP
4.Q-K2N-KB3
5.N-B6
Black should have resigned immediately but pushed on until move 17. I didn't come up with this on the spot. I'd seen it in one of Fred Reinfeld's books.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by dwise1, posted 01-16-2025 12:27 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 6291
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 86 of 314 (921560)
01-16-2025 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by KING IYK
01-16-2025 11:20 AM


There are 27 letters in the alphabets.
A [1]

B C D E F G H I J K
L M N O P Q R
S T U V W
X Y Z

&[27] (3 3 3)
Whisky-Tango-Foxtrot-Mike? (What the Foxtrot, man?)
So now you have to resort to lying about the number of letters in the modern Latin alphabet? You have to lie about the ampersand in order to force your "facts" to fit your conclusions. Like you did with the "Cross on the Clock Face" where you had to cut and paste and force things to line up as Percy explained to you. I'm reminded of a scene in The Battle of Britain where a rooky fighter pilot shifted his head to make it look like he had the German plane in his sights. Or a scene (Ann Margaret as I seem to recall) where her character (basically a vacuous bimbo) is doing a jigsaw puzzle where she keeps trying to fit in the wrong piece, first by pounding it into place with her fist and then finally resorting to reshaping it with her nail scissors. That's what you keep doing.
First, the ampersand (&) is not a letter, but rather a ligature:
Wikipedia:
The ampersand, also known as the and sign, is the logogram &, representing the conjunction "and". It originated as a ligature of the letters of the word et (Latin for "and").
A ligature is an example of a glyph:
Wikipedia:
A glyph (/ɡlɪf/ GLIF) is any kind of purposeful mark. In typography, a glyph is "the specific shape, design, or representation of a character".
In my professional career as an Intelligent Designer (ie, software engineer), we worked with characters which included letters, numerals, punctuation marks, and special characters. The "amper" (&) is a special character, not a letter.
So why did you choose to lie in order to serve your god?
There's also the problem of which alphabet? Different alphabets have different numbers of letters. I know this very well having started as a language major during which time I not only learned the Greek, Hebrew, and Cyrillic alphabets, but also several extensions of the Latin alphabet (eg, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Swedish, Old English, Slavic, International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)). Every one of those had a different number of letters.
Do you really think that there's only one alphabet? What rock have you been living under?
Obviously, you are assuming the Latin alphabet, but again you have to answer the same question of which one? Because not only has the Latin alphabet been expanded with special characters (again, eg Spanish, French, Italian, German, Scandanavian languages, Old English (eg, þ ð æ), Slavic), but it also included different letters throughout its history.
Review the Wikipedia article, Latin alphabet for that history; very briefly (since I know your type all too well, so I know that you would never even think of bothering to follow any link to do any research):
  • Old Latin alphabet -- 21 letters: A, B, C, D, E, F, Z, G, H, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, V, X
    Latin included 21 different characters. The letter ⟨C⟩ was the western form of the Greek gamma, but it was used for the sounds /ɡ/ and /k/ alike, possibly under the influence of Etruscan, which might have lacked any voiced plosives. Later, probably during the 3rd century BC, the letter ⟨Z⟩ – not needed to write Latin properly – was replaced with the new letter ⟨G⟩, a ⟨C⟩ modified with a small vertical stroke, which took its place in the alphabet. From then on, ⟨G⟩ represented the voiced plosive /ɡ/, while ⟨C⟩ was generally reserved for the voiceless plosive /k/. The letter ⟨K⟩ was used only rarely, in a small number of words such as Kalendae, often interchangeably with ⟨C⟩.
  • Classical Latin alphabet -- 23 letters: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, V, X, Y, Z (please notice the absence of J and U and W)
    After the Roman conquest of Greece in the 1st century BC, Latin adopted the Greek letters ⟨Y⟩ and ⟨Z⟩ (or readopted, in the latter case) to write Greek loanwords, placing them at the end of the alphabet. An attempt by the emperor Claudius to introduce three additional letters did not last. Thus it was during the classical Latin period that the Latin alphabet contained 21 letters and 2 foreign letters.
  • Medieval and later developments -- 26 letters (not including addition of more letters in the many variant alphabets as noted above)
    It was not until the Middle Ages that the letter ⟨W⟩ (originally a ligature of two ⟨V⟩s) was added to the Latin alphabet, to represent sounds from the Germanic languages which did not exist in medieval Latin, and only after the Renaissance did the convention of treating ⟨I⟩ and ⟨U⟩ as vowels, and ⟨J⟩ and ⟨V⟩ as consonants, become established. Prior to that, the former had been merely allographs of the latter.
So, which alphabet?
{ABE:
AND FROM WHICH TIME PERIOD?
Exactly when were all these "amazing" numeric correlations set up? In the Middle Ages? In Ancient Rome? Before then? Or this morning when you decided to lie about the ampersand? Or from the Beginning of Time? WHEN?
If from the Beginning of Time (theologically, the most likely answer), then why (and how) would that be tied to the Latin alphabet which came much later? Even though they came up with this "Trinity" stuff, they came along far too late (theologically speaking). Same with the more applicable Greek alphabet (that's what the New Testament manuscripts were written in, along with some being in Aramaic): those languages came along far too late. Arguably Hebrew would be a far better choice (eg, famous anecdote of a professor starting his Hebrew class with "This is the language that God spoke."), but there again Hebrew has a history of its development; eg, the Hebrew alphabet being derived from Phoenician.
And how can you justify your choice?
}
Or do you assume that Modern English alphabet is the only one that exists, or at least the only one that matters? Really? You are engaging in flagrant and ignorant ethnocentrism? Why am I not surprised?
Sorry, but nothing says "stupid" as clearly as falling in the ethnocentric booby trap that you set up yourself and then having the bad manners to appear surprised -- or worse, not even realize that you had trapped yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by KING IYK, posted 01-16-2025 11:20 AM KING IYK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by KING IYK, posted 01-17-2025 10:23 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8748
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 87 of 314 (921570)
01-16-2025 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by KING IYK
01-16-2025 11:20 AM


Bible Go Poof!
The Holy Trinity:
A single God existing as three identical entities. In the concept of The Trinity, Three and One are the same.
We can accept this as a religious concept, but NOT as fact. The reality appears to be quite different. There doesn’t appear to be anything in this universe that evidences a supernatural let alone your specific flavors of deity.
The recurring sequence 3 6 9 is magnificent for its representation of
The Truth: THE HOLY TRINITY !!! 3 3 3
Yes. Religious numerology. We know. Somehow this sequence 3 6 9 is repackaged as 3 3 3 which you chose to emotionally represent as your god. No divinity creation evident or necessary. As human constructs meant to represent quantities, numbers carry only what human emotion and action our fantasies impart to them.
The Holy Trinity is assigned the numerical value
3 3 3 and Satan is self-assigned 6 6 6.[Revelation 13:18]
When you incorporate Isaiah 14:14 [which states:
Your scriptural references mean nothing. They carry no force of legitimate evidence. They are all statements of faith without any demonstrable reality to support their existence. The bible disappears in a puff of logic.
When The Cross is fixed into a Time Clock, the co-ordinates are 3 6 9 and 12.
That depends on what graphics program you use. You can juxtapose any symbols of your personal emotional meanings with other symbols to produce enhanced emotional feelings. Those feelings are personal emotional and cannot be shown to represent reality.
Your clock face specially cropped over a specific image of torture and murder is your personal choice. It does not add any legitimate data to the issue. It is just another graphic that meets your specific emotional need.
God is an ULTIMATE UNIT existing in eternity as Three distinct Entities in The Name of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit.
Statement of faith. You still cannot show that such things exist in this universe outside your personal ramblings.
When all three entities are united to become an ULTIMATE UNIT(a single digit) by deriving the digital root of the sum and the digital root of the unifying Godhead\God is derived, the result is:
Again with the religious numerology. Again, no demonstrable connections to the reality of this universe. No gods evident.
Ultimate Unit rejected.
The Earth is the Third of Nine Planets.
The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 9.
9 is comprised of three 3s: 3 3 3
No. There are only 8 planets. Planets are a human conception with an agreed upon consensus definition.
The Resulting Numbers are 3 & 8.
8 is comprised of: 3 3 2. No trinity shown. No gods shown.
The Bible is comprised of The New Testament and The Old Testament.
Again, your bible shows nothing but the emotional thoughts and statements of faith of an ancient tribe of despots. It evidences nothing but the violent bloodlust of its warlords.
The remaining points in your tome are more of the same statements of faith and fallacious numerology. I'll skip those.
Put mind to task and examine the evidence. When done, you will be left with two choices: Proclaim this Proof to be The Truth or declare me The Greatest Mathematician The World has ever seen.
Checkmate!!!
Fortunately the world has real mathematicians and sane people to destroy your concoctions along with this “Proof” of your deity.
You have failed.

“There’s simply no polite way to tell people they’ve dedicated their lives to an illusion,”
-Daniel Dennett
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by KING IYK, posted 01-16-2025 11:20 AM KING IYK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by KING IYK, posted 01-17-2025 4:44 PM AZPaul3 has replied

  
KING IYK
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: 01-08-2025


Message 88 of 314 (921578)
01-17-2025 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by dwise1
01-16-2025 2:10 PM


You state “the modern latin alphabet”, which lets me know that you have done some research and discovered that the ampersand (&) was once the 27th alphabet but cleverly chose to withhold that information. I say to you, however, that the “&” is the 27th letter and all creations of Man are inspirations and Man is but a vessel.
Language is composed of written and oral form. Not just Oral. In written form, & proves exceedingly efficient.
If it is the will of God to choose The English Language as the medium to unite the entire human race, so it will be.
Genesis 11:9: because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by dwise1, posted 01-16-2025 2:10 PM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Percy, posted 01-17-2025 11:41 AM KING IYK has not replied
 Message 90 by Tangle, posted 01-17-2025 1:55 PM KING IYK has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 89 of 314 (921579)
01-17-2025 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by KING IYK
01-17-2025 10:23 AM


The & was part of the English alphabet from around 1835 until near the end of the 1800's. During that period there were only 8 planets. Pluto wasn't discovered until 1930, making 9 planets, but then the discovery of Eris (more massive than Pluto) forced refinements in the definition of what a planet was, returning the number of planets to 8. But there's a possibility of another planet out beyond Pluto, and if one is discovered then that would return the number of planets to 9, except that if in your view Pluto is a planet then there would be 10.
This is just another way of telling you what you've been told many times already in this thread, that these numbers are human constructs and are impermanent. If there is a celestial plane, these human-made numbers are not part of it.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by KING IYK, posted 01-17-2025 10:23 AM KING IYK has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9702
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 90 of 314 (921581)
01-17-2025 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by KING IYK
01-17-2025 10:23 AM


The bible was written almost entirely in Hebrew. Hebrew has 22 letters. Sadly 22 does not divide comfortably by 3.
Now what?

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by KING IYK, posted 01-17-2025 10:23 AM KING IYK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by KING IYK, posted 01-17-2025 3:25 PM Tangle has replied
 Message 92 by Percy, posted 01-17-2025 4:06 PM Tangle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025