Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 38 (9269 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Tiktaalik
Post Volume: Total: 923,113 Year: 3,435/6,935 Month: 67/198 Week: 15/55 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Inspecting a rock the day after creation
dad3
Member (Idle past 331 days)
Posts: 65
Joined: 01-02-2025


Message 1 of 2 (921180)
01-02-2025 10:50 PM


If you were there in Eden a day after it was all done, and saw a rock, would you think it was billions of years old? The isotope ratios would be there. The thing is, the reason for their existing would not have been radioactive decay. That only could start after the rock was there. Putting aside the one day of radioactive decay because it would be too tiny to be significant, all the ratios would be there because that was how it was created.
Natural processes can only start after creation. Science has used only what we can observe in the rock, such as the radioactive decay rates etc to come up with a model of how old the rock was and how it came to exist.
Scientists examining that rock, in Eden, if they were transported there, would declare the rock to be billions of years old.
Do you agree?

Admin
Director
Posts: 13194
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 2 (921193)
01-03-2025 9:30 AM


Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the Inspecting a rock the day after creation thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025