Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 45 (9233 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChemEngrMBA
Post Volume: Total: 921,678 Year: 2,000/6,935 Month: 124/306 Week: 56/47 Day: 0/5 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Second Trump Presidency
PaulK
Member
Posts: 18143
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 6.0


Message 136 of 907 (921094)
12-26-2024 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Percy
12-26-2024 8:55 AM


Re: If you liked the first Trump presidency you're going to love the second
And Trump is still being an idiot over the Panama Canal, now claiming that Chinese soldiers are operating it BBC
He’s an embarrassment to America - again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Percy, posted 12-26-2024 8:55 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
K.Rose
Member
Posts: 256
From: Michigan
Joined: 02-02-2024
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 137 of 907 (921095)
12-26-2024 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by dwise1
12-24-2024 8:45 PM


Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!
Hello dwise1, good to hear from you!
It was a simple salutation and observance, meant to remind me and others that we are all here in this imperfect world and, to a great extent, our existence here depends on how we treat one another.
The EvC Forum participants would look like very polarized belligerents to the non-EvC outsider civilian. But, really, we probably have alot more in common than it would appear since we are all spending precious time communicating ideas of shared interests passionately.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by dwise1, posted 12-24-2024 8:45 PM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by dwise1, posted 12-26-2024 8:11 PM K.Rose has not replied
 Message 140 by Percy, posted 12-26-2024 8:38 PM K.Rose has replied
 Message 145 by dronestar, posted 12-27-2024 9:35 AM K.Rose has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 6291
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 138 of 907 (921096)
12-26-2024 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by K.Rose
12-26-2024 7:56 PM


Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!
... our existence here depends on how we treat one another.
Yes, indeed. Among normal people.
But you're a Trumpist and a MAGAt, so you don't care how you treat others. For you, cruelty is the point.
And if you are a Christian Nationalist, then doubly so.
Just be a Mensch, already!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by K.Rose, posted 12-26-2024 7:56 PM K.Rose has not replied

  
K.Rose
Member
Posts: 256
From: Michigan
Joined: 02-02-2024
Member Rating: 3.3


(1)
(1)
Message 139 of 907 (921097)
12-26-2024 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Percy
12-26-2024 8:55 AM


Re: If you liked the first Trump presidency you're going to love the second
TRANSPARENCY & SHADE
The Trump Administration is shaping up to be the most transparent of any administration in history, and all indications are they will keep their pledge to do so. His nominees/posse are promising to post their daily goings-on to various social media, and most of them can’t get enough of talking to the old media, the new media, the public at large, and so on. They’re all eager to tell you what they’ve done, what they’re doing, and what they plan to do.
Contrast this with the stonewalling, gaslighting, secrecy, and out-and-out lying of the current Administration, and the Administration's general dismissiveness of the electorate’s interest in the government’s policies and actions. These are just a few examples:
1. Dronomania – The administration has offered so many conflicting statements that it’s obvious to everyone that they’re hiding something, something the public would very much like to know about. A taste of the Admin’s response to the public’s concerns:
• You’re not really seeing drones; you’re actually mistaking legitimate aircraft for UFO’s.
• We don’t really know what they are, but we can assure you they’re harmless, and don’t shoot them because we don’t know what they’re payload is……if they really are drones.
• From Homeland Security: We don’t have the authority to shoot them down.
2. Afghanistan debacle: Great idea to get out of that quagmire, but executed in the in the most disastrous, humiliating, and destructive way possible. The administration hails it as a great military operation, no further explanation needed or given.
3. Telling Ukraine to shoot advanced missiles into Russia a couple weeks after Harris lost the election, a significant and potentially catastrophic escalation of the war largely seen as formal US entry into the war, at least by Russia. Maybe there was good reason for this, but they haven’t explained it, and it sure looks like Biden is simply trying to jam things up for Trump and the Trump promise to bring peace to the region.
4. Selling the Border wall materials as scrap for pennies on the dollar – Maybe there is a clear explanation for this, but it sure looks like Biden is simply trying to jam things up for Trump and the Trump promise to continue construction of the wall. And they aren’t Trump’s materials, they’re the taxpayers’ materials, and the taxpayers will have to pay for these materials again at premium prices.
5. Chinese weather spy balloon: The balloon floats across the US for days, weeks with no response to China from the Administration, the ballon traverses military installations and who knows what else, and we’re told not to worry about it, it’s not really getting any good info if it is a spy balloon, and it’s not dangerous but we don’t want to shoot it down because we don’t know what will happen. And when we finally shoot it down we blow it to smithereens so there is no useful reconnaissance of the ballon’s functions and hardware. And, of course, no explanations, just nothing to see here, run along now.
6. President Biden’s mental fitness: Everybody has known about the decline since before the 2020 election, but with the recent reports we now know that the Administration, The DoD, and Congressional Leaders, among others, knew officially of the decline but did everything they could to hide this from the public. Until the June-2024 debate fiasco, that is.
7. So they very un-democratically pushed Biden out and jammed Harris in without any primary voting activity (because there was no time to do things democratically, you see). Again, no explanation of anything and no discussion, despite objections from their own party.
8. So who’s been running the country since June when it was decided he was not fit for the election? Who’s been running it since the election? Matter of fact, who’s running it now? Who decided it’s a good idea to have Ukraine fire our advanced missiles into Russia? Who decided it’s a good idea to give clemency/pardons to thousands of seeming random recipients? Who's running the show?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Percy, posted 12-26-2024 8:55 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Percy, posted 12-26-2024 8:57 PM K.Rose has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 140 of 907 (921098)
12-26-2024 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by K.Rose
12-26-2024 7:56 PM


Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!
K.Rose writes in Message 137:
It was a simple salutation and observance, meant to remind me and others that we are all here in this imperfect world and, to a great extent, our existence here depends on how we treat one another.
Donald Trump on Illegal Immigrants:
The Democrats say, 'Please don't call them animals. They're humans.' I said, 'No, they're not humans, they're not humans, they're animals.
...
blood-thirsty criminals
...
the most violent people on earth
Where do see "good will toward men" in that?
The EvC Forum participants would look like very polarized belligerents to the non-EvC outsider civilian.
Given Trump's cruel policies, how do you justify calling those opposing them as "very polarized belligerents"? Aren't they the ones who embody the sentiments you earlier expressed?
But, really, we probably have a lot more in common than it would appear since we are all spending precious time communicating ideas of shared interests passionately.
What qualities do you see us having in common?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by K.Rose, posted 12-26-2024 7:56 PM K.Rose has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by K.Rose, posted 12-31-2024 5:46 PM Percy has replied

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1567
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009
Member Rating: 1.0


(1)
Message 141 of 907 (921099)
12-26-2024 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by K.Rose
12-23-2024 9:35 PM


Re: Jan 6 the day of infamy
Not only is there no case, formal charges would force discovery of all evidence, evidence that heretofore has not been presented, evidence that might tell a much different story, evidence that might impugn those who were all but certain they had evaded accountability.
Yes, formal charges would have exposed the lack of security, and those responsible for it. (Nancy Pelosi). And the fact that the few policemen that were there invited some of the first ones to arrive inside. Also would have been a much more thorough investigation on the murder of Ashley Babbitt.
Trump will pardon some, possibly not all, of the rioters from January 6th. The mainstream media will be all over it of course, much more than they have been about Biden's lie about not pardoning his son, or about his recent commuting of most federal death row inmates death sentences.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by K.Rose, posted 12-23-2024 9:35 PM K.Rose has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Percy, posted 12-27-2024 10:43 AM marc9000 has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 142 of 907 (921100)
12-26-2024 8:57 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by K.Rose
12-26-2024 8:15 PM


Re: If you liked the first Trump presidency you're going to love the second
You were responding to my Message 134 that was about the incoming Trump administration's announced intent to resume family detention. Nothing you said touched even remotely on that.
Also, this thread is about The Second Trump Presidency, and you barely mentioned Trump, either. If you have legitimate and meaningful criticisms of the Biden administration or the election then I suggest you take them to the The Biden Presidency and 2024 US Presidential Election threads.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by K.Rose, posted 12-26-2024 8:15 PM K.Rose has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by K.Rose, posted 12-27-2024 7:18 AM Percy has replied

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1567
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009
Member Rating: 1.0


(1)
(3)
Message 143 of 907 (921101)
12-26-2024 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by K.Rose
12-23-2024 9:43 PM


Re: Trump Has An Idea
I'm still optimistic given all the expected flak and roadblocks. Trump is much wiser, more prepared, and, yes, more introspective this time around.
It's an interesting turn-around, he's generally more popular now than he was throughout his first term, and after all the fireworks after January 6th 2021. The reason for that is because the public has now had a chance to compare his first term presidency with that of Biden's. But he's now more intensely hated than ever by somewhere around 38% of the population, those with TDS. This includes most of the mainstream media anchors. While those haters refer to their opinions on how terrible Trump was in handling the Covid crisis, the public knows that a Democrat administration wouldn't have done any better.
I'm sure you've heard about this;
https://www.cnn.com/...at-we-know-subway-fire-hnk/index.html
Viewers of the half hour evening news reports haven't, no reports. The woman as yet hasn't been identified, understandable, since she was pretty much burned beyond recognition, including any identification she might have had. The mainstream media treats this case much differently than they did the George Floyd case. She wasn't resisting arrest, there was no suspicion of drug use, but policemen versus illegals get accused differently by the news media. That's their biggest cover-up, most any mention of the heinous crimes that some illegals commit. But they'll pour on the sensationalism when the Trump administration starts the deporting process. There'll be plenty of pics and vids of tear stained faces of illegals as they're being deported.
I trust Trump and Homan will do it right, they should be careful with too many deportations - it's not possible to perfectly correct all that Biden has screwed up. They just need to deport known criminals, and they're going to have to let a lot of illegals who don't seem to be a threat alone. A lot of them are good workers, and the news media will pounce if anyone other than a known criminal is deported. The most important thing is to SEAL THE BORDER. The illegal that set the woman on fire was deported during Trump's first administration, then came back in during the Biden administration. That has to stop, once deported, they have to stay gone.
He has a knack for staying one step ahead of the opposition, diffusing the vicious barbs they throw at him, and coming out on top no matter how convinced they are that "this time we got 'im". Witness all the lawfare failures.
It's so funny to see his haters claim HE'S out for revenge! The recipient of the Mar-a-Lago raid, the attacks of Fani Willis, Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, and others over the past 4 years. The constant hauling him into court, Colorado and other states trying to get him off the ballot, it has gone on and on for the past 4 years. And they accuse HIM of revenge! The public is less against him now than in the past, and they see through a lot of it.
To quote Flounder: "..this is gonna be great!".
We'll see, his haters have a lot of new ideas. But it should be pretty transparent - as I said, they're only out to get him, the well being of the country doesn't matter near as much to them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by K.Rose, posted 12-23-2024 9:43 PM K.Rose has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Percy, posted 12-27-2024 3:46 PM marc9000 has replied

  
K.Rose
Member
Posts: 256
From: Michigan
Joined: 02-02-2024
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 144 of 907 (921102)
12-27-2024 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by Percy
12-26-2024 8:57 PM


Re: If you liked the first Trump presidency you're going to love the second
The point is that the coming Trump presidency will be ultra-transparent. Contrasting this with the current administration should give everyone relief in that regard, even if they disagree with some of Trump's actions.
As far as Message 134, Trump and Homan are choosing to enforce the law rigorously. This is in response to years of rigorous abuse and neglect of the law. The situation has become very ugly because it was allowed to grow out of control due to Biden's policies. Correcting this will be ugly and difficult.
Trump and Homan have solid public support on this front; people want to see the laws enforced. If you don't like the laws then change them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Percy, posted 12-26-2024 8:57 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Percy, posted 12-27-2024 4:31 PM K.Rose has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1507
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.6


(1)
Message 145 of 907 (921103)
12-27-2024 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 137 by K.Rose
12-26-2024 7:56 PM


Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!
kr writes:
. . . our existence here depends on how we treat one another.
K.Rose, the pro-rapist, is pontificating about decent treatment.
Sociopath . . .
Antisocial personality disorder - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by K.Rose, posted 12-26-2024 7:56 PM K.Rose has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


(1)
Message 146 of 907 (921104)
12-27-2024 10:43 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by marc9000
12-26-2024 8:45 PM


Re: Jan 6 the day of infamy
marc9000 writes in Message 141:
Not only is there no case, formal charges would force discovery of all evidence, evidence that heretofore has not been presented, evidence that might tell a much different story, evidence that might impugn those who were all but certain they had evaded accountability.
Yes, formal charges would have exposed the lack of security, and those responsible for it. (Nancy Pelosi).
This is a PRATT that has been rebutted so widely and often and is so obviously untrue that anyone repeating it now is just lying. The Speaker of the House is not responsible for security. Nancy Pelosi was no more responsible for security on January 6th then Mike Johnson is now.
And the fact that the few policemen that were there invited some of the first ones to arrive inside.
Any police who helped or assisted January 6th rioters were investigated for it: Capitol Police Suspends 6 Officers, Investigates Dozens More After Capitol Riots : Capitol Insurrection Updates : NPR. Invading the capitol broke the law, and anyone assisting those who invaded the capitol broke the law, including police.
Also would have been a much more thorough investigation on the murder of Ashley Babbitt.
It's on video. After the window of the door to the House Speaker's Lobby was broken, through which Congressmen could be seen, Ashli Babbitt went through and was killed. The man who broke the window, Chad Barrett Jones of Kentucky, was found guilty of two felonies and various misdemeanors. His sentencing was set for November 8th of last year, then was rescheduled, and since I can find no mention of his actual sentencing it may not have happened yet. The maximum sentence for his offenses is 20 years, but the maximum has never yet been imposed on any January 6th rioter. Wikipedia doesn't list a sentencing for Jones (List of cases of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia).
Trump will pardon some, possibly not all, of the rioters from January 6th.
Yes, he probably will.
The mainstream media will be all over it of course, much more than they have been about Biden's lie about not pardoning his son, or about his recent commuting of most federal death row inmates death sentences.
Yes, the mainstream media reported these events, as they will undoubtedly report on Trump pardons. But you're comparing apples and oranges. Hunter Biden was pursued relentlessly not because of what he did but because of who he was, and most of it was based on the lies of FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who pleaded guilty early this month to lying about a phony bribery scheme involving Joe and Hunter Biden. The death row inmates weren't pardoned but only had their sentences commuted to life in prison.
In contrast, any Trump pardons will free the insurrectionists who committed felonies against the government of the United States at the behest of then president Donald Trump.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by marc9000, posted 12-26-2024 8:45 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by dwise1, posted 12-27-2024 2:57 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 150 by marc9000, posted 12-29-2024 4:16 PM Percy has replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 6291
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


(1)
Message 147 of 907 (921106)
12-27-2024 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Percy
12-27-2024 10:43 AM


Re: Jan 6 the day of infamy
The Speaker of the House is not responsible for security. Nancy Pelosi was no more responsible for security on January 6th then Mike Johnson is now.
And indeed, we have film of Pelosi on the phone pleading for the person actually responsible for security, Pres. Donald Trump, to call in the National Guard.
And where was Trump at that time? Not MIA (missing in action), but rather sitting in inaction in front of his TV enjoying the news coverage of his rioters and refusing to take any action to stop it, including refusing to listen to his own staff's pleas for him to take action.
Funny how MAGAts fiercely maintain their willful ignorance of the facts.
meatpuppet9000 writes:
... the murder of Ashley Babbitt.
t's on video. After the window of the door to the House Speaker's Lobby was broken, through which Congressmen could be seen, Ashli Babbitt went through and was killed.
And we've reviewed and discussed those videos (the second one taken by a rioter from behind which clearly shows her continuing to advance through the broken window before being shot in direct defiance of shouted orders to stop and retreat).
Here is what I explained to meatpuppet9000 in Message 430 (04-Dec-2021):
dwise1 writes:
Ashli Babbitt was a US Air Force veteran. My understanding is that she was an SP (Security Police). SPs are the ones who provide security for USAF facilities, including the alert pad and weapons storage areas. They are taught to take their duties very seriously.

If you are trying to gain access to any secure area and there's anything about that looks or sounds wrong, then you can be subject to getting jacked up immediately and found yourself face-down in the snow with an M-16 muzzle jammed against the back of your neck (as per reports by airmen who had had that personal experience with the business end of an M-16 or had personally witnessed it happening).

In addition, we were taught in basic training about the red lines. Especially on SAC bases (and I was stationed on one), secure areas are indicated by a red line painted around that secure area (eg, aircraft on the alert pad). SPs are authorized to use deadly force on anyone crossing the red line for which they are responsible -- actually, remembering back I seem to recall that they have standing orders to shoot to kill. Absolutely no requirement to determine first whether that intruder is armed.

By physically breaching the secured perimeter of the House chambers (the doors were locked down and had to be breached by violent force), she crossed that red line. She definitely knew what she was doing and what the consequences should be -- if after 12 years of service, especially if she was an SP, she still didn't know that, then she couldn't have been very smart which is supported by her not having advanced past E4 (SrA) after 12 years (I had made E5 in a third of that time).

She crossed that line during a high security situation (she and her fellow f**king traitors were physically attacking the Capitol with extreme malice and were fighting to gain physical access to government officials for the obvious purpose of doing them grievous harm), she knew full well what she was doing, she knew full well what the consequences would be, and she got what she knew she would. Plus, that kept her fellow traitorous pukes from repeating her actions.

I feel sorry for her family, but she paid for her own stupidity and she alone is responsible ... except for whoever incited her traitorous actions (eg, Trump, Lin Wood). I hope that she didn't have any children, so that she could qualify for a Darwin Award by having removed herself from the gene pool through conspicuous stupidity.
meatpuppet9000 did not reply, but instead continued to repeat his same stupid lie. When he repeated it in his Message 80 (23-Jul-2023) I reposted my earlier reply on the same day in my Message 88. Though I added:
dwise1 writes:
I seem to recall that the doors to that antechamber had panic hardware on the inside, such that once she had penetrated that chamber all she would have had to do was to turn around and press the bar to open the door for the rest of the violent traitors to flood in, overwhelming the congressmen's defenders. That cop did his duty!
I also have insight from my son who is a cop. When the police arrive on a scene, especially a violent scene, their primary first goal is to establish control over the situation, because failing to do so gets innocent people killed. Therefore, if you are caught in such a situation, your primary obligation is to follow police orders. Failure to do so will lead to bad consequences for you, especially if your actions appear to be aggressive as Babbitt's were.
But please, the next time you are part of a violent mob moving against policemen, then do follow Ashli Babbitt's shining example of the stupidest thing you could possibly do, since you believe so strongly that you should. As I understand it, the ride to the morgue is free.
But first, have you already procreated? If not, then we will put you in for a Darwin Award, posthumously since that is how most Darwin Awards are awarded.
That time he did "reply", but only to try to change the subject.
Ashli Babbitt was not murdered, but rather she committed suicide by cop:
Wikipedia:
Suicide by cop (SbC), also known as suicide by police or law-enforcement-assisted suicide, is a suicide method in which a suicidal individual deliberately behaves in a threatening manner with intent to provoke a lethal response from a public safety or law enforcement officer to end their own life.
Due to her over-a-decade of military training and experience in the same capacity of the cop whom she chose to provoke, she knew fully well and far better than most of the other rioters there how the cops would respond to her actions. Clearly a suicide-by-cop.
The only alternative is that she died of terminal stupidity. And her inability to ever learn (referring to her 12 years of military training that just rolled of her back like water on a duck).
Should someone be held responsible for her death? If so, then that would clearly be Trump who had ordered that riot to be organized as part of his planned insurrection.
meatpuppet9000 writes:
... or about his recent commuting of most federal death row inmates death sentences.
The death row inmates weren't pardoned but only had their sentences commuted to life in prison.
Even though meatpuppet9000 did say "commute" instead of "pardon", we cannot assume that he knows the difference.
Perhaps we should also test his knowledge of tariffs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Percy, posted 12-27-2024 10:43 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


(1)
Message 148 of 907 (921107)
12-27-2024 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by marc9000
12-26-2024 9:22 PM


Re: Trump Has An Idea
marc9000 writes in Message 143:
I'm still optimistic given all the expected flak and roadblocks. Trump is much wiser, more prepared, and, yes, more introspective this time around.
It's an interesting turn-around, he's generally more popular now than he was throughout his first term, and after all the fireworks after January 6th 2021.
By fireworks, do you mean attacking our democratic institutions and even his own vice-president?
I trust Trump and Homan will do it right, they should be careful with too many deportations - it's not possible to perfectly correct all that Biden has screwed up. They just need to deport known criminals, and they're going to have to let a lot of illegals who don't seem to be a threat alone.
I think everyone's on board with deporting illegal immigrants who commit crimes, but that's not what Trump and and border adviser Homan are saying. While Trump has whipped up hysteria about illegal immigrants bringing a wave of crime, statistics show that illegal immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than the general population. If Trump wants to reduce crime he should let in more immigrants, not less.
A lot of them are good workers,...
Any large group of people, like illegal immigrants, will be very similar in these types of qualities to any other large group of people, like American citizens. They'll all fit under similar bell shaped curves for qualities like intelligence, integrity, and so forth.
...and the news media will pounce if anyone other than a known criminal is deported.
I don't know about that, but the news media will undoubtedly call attention to abuses like family detention, which Homan has vowed to resume.
The most important thing is to SEAL THE BORDER.
I don't think you really want to seal the border. I think what you really want is to reduce the number of people crossing the border illegally, and I think we all want that. But echoing K.Rose's call for good will toward men, I want those who do cross the border illegally to be treated fairly and humanely, and I want requests for amnesty honored and heard fairly in a timely fashion.
The illegal that set the woman on fire was deported during Trump's first administration, then came back in during the Biden administration. That has to stop, once deported, they have to stay gone.
How do you propose guaranteeing that never happens? Getting across any border is a crap shoot. A certain percentage will always get across. Who makes it and who doesn't is serendipitous. No border is 100% impervious.
It's so funny to see his haters claim HE'S out for revenge!
K.Rose keeps mentioning transparency, what I called "think it/say it", and Trump has been very clear about his desire for revenge. For just one recent example, he spoke publicly about going after Liz Cheney for her participation on the January 6th committee. That's very transparent, and denials that Trump is seeking vengeance aren't consistent with what he says.
But about haters, I think a more accurate term is "those who believe in accountability."
The recipient of the Mar-a-Lago raid, the attacks of Fani Willis, Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, and others over the past 4 years.
Didn't he do what he's accused of doing? Jack Smith is winding down his federal cases because they can't go forward against a sitting president, but Bragg won a conviction on 34 counts, and the Georgia election interference case will go forward, but without Willis.
The constant hauling him into court,...
If he hadn't incited insurrection, committed election interference, engaged in illicit business practices, withheld classified documents he had no right to, sexually abused women, and used campaign funds for payoffs, then he wouldn't find himself in courtrooms all the time.
Colorado and other states trying to get him off the ballot,...
Colorado applied a law that prohibits people who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion from running for public office. The conservative Supreme Court ruled that only the federal government can determine who runs for president. They were silent about whether Trump had engaged in insurrection.
...it has gone on and on for the past 4 years.
The length of time is unfortunate. Part of the blame must go to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who moved extremely slowly in moving forward on investigations and appointing a prosecutor. And part of the blame must go to Trump's legal teams who so successfully fought for delays across all the cases.
And they accuse HIM of revenge!
I can't believe you're saying this. You've undoubtedly been listening to what Trump says on the news for months, so how can you deny that Trump has vowed vengeance, something he's done repeatedly. You shouldn't need reminding, but to cite just one instance, here's what he said in a June interview with Sean Hannity: “Look, when this election is over, based on what they’ve done, I would have every right to go after them, and it would be easy because it’s Joe Biden.”
The public is less against him now than in the past, and they see through a lot of it.
It makes no sense to me that the country has again elected Trump. They know not what they do.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by marc9000, posted 12-26-2024 9:22 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by marc9000, posted 12-29-2024 5:45 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 23364
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.8


(1)
Message 149 of 907 (921108)
12-27-2024 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by K.Rose
12-27-2024 7:18 AM


Re: If you liked the first Trump presidency you're going to love the second
K.Rose writes in Message 144:
The point is that the coming Trump presidency will be ultra-transparent. Contrasting this with the current administration should give everyone relief in that regard, even if they disagree with some of Trump's actions.
It's like you're living in an alternate universe. Trump can barely get through a sentence without uttering some lie or misrepresentation. When measuring honesty and integrity Trump doesn't even move the needle.
As far as Message 134, Trump and Homan are choosing to enforce the law rigorously.
Cruelly even, one might say.
This is in response to years of rigorous abuse and neglect of the law.
How so?
The situation has become very ugly because it was allowed to grow out of control due to Biden's policies.
Yes, I know, you want to blame Biden for everything, even drones over New Jersey.
Correcting this will be ugly and difficult.
Well, yes, cruelty is pretty ugly, but cruelty is what you're endorsing by supporting Homan's plans.
The border problem isn't the fault of any politician. It was created by conditions in Central America that caused large numbers of people to flee deadly crime and/or desperate economic conditions. I hope that every administration deals with those trying to enter the country illegally as humanely as possible. People have to be pretty desperate to leave their homes with few possessions or resources and face unknown dangers, and we shouldn't be making their lives any more wretched than they already are.
Trump and Homan have solid public support on this front; people want to see the laws enforced. If you don't like the laws then change them.
I think everyone wants the laws enforced, but not at the expense of their humanity. I hope everyone who understands a law is cruel would want to change it.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by K.Rose, posted 12-27-2024 7:18 AM K.Rose has not replied

  
marc9000
Member
Posts: 1567
From: Ky U.S.
Joined: 12-25-2009
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 150 of 907 (921114)
12-29-2024 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Percy
12-27-2024 10:43 AM


Re: Jan 6 the day of infamy
marc9000 writes:
Yes, formal charges would have exposed the lack of security, and those responsible for it. (Nancy Pelosi).

This is a PRATT that has been rebutted so widely and often and is so obviously untrue that anyone repeating it now is just lying. The Speaker of the House is not responsible for security. Nancy Pelosi was no more responsible for security on January 6th then Mike Johnson is now.
Very good, you addressed two words out of the 17 that I wrote. SOMEBODY was responsible for the lack of security, and I doubt if it was Trump.
​Any police who helped or assisted January 6th rioters were investigated for it: Capitol Police Suspends 6 Officers, Investigates Dozens More After Capitol Riots : Capitol Insurrection Updates : NPR. Invading the capitol broke the law, and anyone assisting those who invaded the capitol broke the law, including police.
Unless the police were black, and murdered a white woman.
It's on video. After the window of the door to the House Speaker's Lobby was broken, through which Congressmen could be seen, Ashli Babbitt went through and was killed.
Right. She wasn't resisting arrest. She wasn't a big strong man with a threatening physical presence. She was a U.S. service veteran. No evidence that she was on drugs. LOTS of differences between her and George Floyd. Which of the two got more media sensationalism time?
Yes, the mainstream media reported these events, as they will undoubtedly report on Trump pardons.
But there will be a huge difference in the amount of time and sensationalism spent on Trump events, versus the quick passing reports on Biden events and lies.
But you're comparing apples and oranges. Hunter Biden was pursued relentlessly not because of what he did but because of who he was,
And Trump wasn't pursued relentlessly because of who HE was?? The guy whose 2016 win was the biggest embarrassment to the mocking Democrat party that they've ever received? No difference between the apple and the orange man.
and most of it was based on the lies of FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who pleaded guilty early this month to lying about a phony bribery scheme involving Joe and Hunter Biden.
There are still a lot of questions about the schemes of Joe and Hunter Biden. Joe's claims of not knowing a thing in this world about his son's business dealings aren't getting any easier to believe, since recently released pictures of Joe and others have come to light. Only Fox News reports that, not the mainstream media.
The death row inmates weren't pardoned but only had their sentences commuted to life in prison.
Yes with no possibility of parole. That's about as believable as Biden's claims that he wouldn't pardon his son. If they do get paroled, it will be covered up of course.
]In contrast, any Trump pardons will free the insurrectionists who committed felonies against the government of the United States at the behest of then president Donald Trump.
Their "crimes" don't even compare to the heinous crimes that Biden's death-row-forgiven inmates committed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Percy, posted 12-27-2024 10:43 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Percy, posted 12-29-2024 8:31 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025