The relevant study had to do with what I quoted. The Chilean observatory DES study.
Really? I couldn't find anything related to "psychic studies."
The early universe, at 379,000 years old, is clearly "flat". Per CMB.
I dont think there is debate on the first 380,000 years.
Well, it wasn't the cosmic microwave background when it was emitted. And we are trying to compare observations made here and now on Earth of events that occurred in the distant past.
quote:
I'm not sure what you want to discuss, or if you really meant psychic studies and miracles, or if it's your personal feelings about cosmology as if you have a stake in the final explanation?
What is magic to one generation is science to another.
What is a miracle to one generation is part of the known physical laws of the universe to another.
You seem to be taking us from science to magic and miracles, rather than the other way around.
This hasn't made it any clearer what you want to discuss.
The expansion rate of the universe, per Type 1A SUPERNOVAE observations, never has had exactly identical numbers per observation.
I think that can be said for any scientific observations.
Exactly identical numbers per observation would be a clue that you might have a problem with your equipment or your analysis.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that it has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --Percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
Why should anyone debate someone who doesn't know the subject? -- AZPaul3
™ Version 4.2
(1)