Who Owns the Standard Definition of Evolution

I'm staking a claim to the Standard Definition of Evolution (copyright pending). Nobody else has. It's mine.Every time a creationist uses the term, i.e., abuses it, ka-ching!Where reason fails, pain might work.

Now you are at the point in your trollish arc where you claim answers were already answered, their challenges met.If that is so, quote or briefly summarize your rebuttal. Otherwise you are taking up bandwidth that could contain actual meaning. Shall we now debate the progress of the debate? Soon you will tire of this and leave to troll something else you don't understand -- the opportunities are legion.Why waste your time and ours?Please see yourself out.

Why not, if it happened once? Your Bible posits thousands were magicked into existence.In near-infinite space over near-infinite time (or fully, both) the universe has produced stars and planetary systems through the same processes everywhere we look. The universe is managing everything else perfectly well on its pwn without a god, so why not life? Why not many times?My personal, wholly intuitive hunch, is that the universe tends to produce life as surely as it formed the galaxies. Further, I think life tends to evolve toward sentience and intelligence as naturally as apples fall to earth.Now, that's my deep flash of intuition about things, fueled years ago by star-gazing and wine. It's a pretty thought, and perhaps a profound one.But unlike you and your myth, I don't believe it.

Didn't you used to be a snake?

Amen.

Bookmarks handed out at my local library say "Don't hold the movie against the book."

He means he'll give up his bad faith self-contradictions when his hands mutate into talons. Or when his own progeny literally fly from the womb.He wants to see natural selection produce a new species in a single birth event.His parents likely would have preferred that, too.