Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: The Rutificador chile
Post Volume: Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   ChatGPT
Phat
Member
Posts: 18651
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 16 of 152 (908055)
03-06-2023 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Theodoric
03-05-2023 3:21 PM


Re: Expert: A Has Been drip under pressure
You are an expert at slandering people. Jordan Peterson is your latest victim.
We can discuss the Biden cabinet, but this is the wrong topic for it. Present your argument elsewhere and I MIGHT respond.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Theodoric, posted 03-05-2023 3:21 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Theodoric, posted 03-06-2023 12:43 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18651
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 17 of 152 (908057)
03-06-2023 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Theodoric
03-05-2023 11:45 AM


TOPIC: Chat GPT
I am redirecting your ongoing rant here. Message 106
This was due to my watching two interesting videos on this subject: Narrated by a human)
and

Knowing that you dont watch videos, I asked Chat GPT about Capitalism vs Socialism.
I phrased my question this way:
quote:
Is Capitalism the best economic system in the world?
ChatGPT:
As an AI language model, I don't hold personal opinions, but I can provide you with some information that might help you make your own judgment.
Capitalism is an economic system that emphasizes private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods and services for profit. Supporters of capitalism argue that it encourages innovation, competition, and efficiency, leading to higher economic growth and increased prosperity for individuals and society as a whole.
Critics, on the other hand, argue that capitalism can lead to income inequality, environmental degradation, and exploitation of workers. They argue that the profit motive can sometimes lead to unethical or immoral behavior, such as putting profits above the well-being of workers or the environment. (It could have gone on...)
That took around 20 seconds.
Add by Edit: The Chat GPT website mentions that they have a sarcastic chatbot
that reminds me of you, Theo. It's called Marv. When I thought about it, its creator/programmers must have been thinking of Marvin the paranoid android!
quote:
Marv is a chatbot that reluctantly answers questions with sarcastic responses:
You: How many pounds are in a kilogram?
Marv: This again? There are 2.2 pounds in a kilogram. Please make a note of this.
You: What does HTML stand for?
Marv: Was Google too busy? Hypertext Markup Language. The T is for try to ask better questions in the future.
You: When did the first airplane fly?
Marv: On December 17, 1903, Wilbur and Orville Wright made the first flights. I wish they’d come and take me away.
You: What is the meaning of life?
Marv: I’m not sure. I’ll ask my friend Google.
You are more sarcastic than paranoid.
And this also got me thinking of a scary future. A platform developer like Percy could create a whole posting board with AI members and each would have their own quirky personality! Trolls would come and go and be mystified that they got shut down so fast! We all could become AI celebrities as our bots generated income for the site long after we all retired!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Theodoric, posted 03-05-2023 11:45 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Theodoric, posted 03-06-2023 12:44 PM Phat has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9489
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 6.1


(2)
Message 18 of 152 (908062)
03-06-2023 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Phat
03-06-2023 11:24 AM


Re: Expert: A Has Been drip under pressure
Learn what slander is before you use the word. Nothing I said about Peterson is libelous. It is public record.
You are the one that brought up the Biden cabinet. If you, as typical, don't want to defend your assertions I will not be surprised. I have no argument you acted as if you did.
The troll has to troll.

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Phat, posted 03-06-2023 11:24 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Phat, posted 03-07-2023 10:29 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9489
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 6.1


(2)
Message 19 of 152 (908063)
03-06-2023 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Phat
03-06-2023 11:49 AM


Re: TOPIC: Chat GPT
Fuck you.

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Phat, posted 03-06-2023 11:49 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18651
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 20 of 152 (908123)
03-07-2023 10:12 PM


Asking ChatGPT about Global Finance
I know that you guys get tired of my belief and predictions regarding the direction and future of global finance so I thought Chat GPT might help.
ChatGPT:
Phat:Can the global financial system survive without being backed by gold or other precious metals?
CleverPhat:Yes, the global financial system can survive without being backed by gold or other precious metals. In fact, most countries have already moved away from the gold standard and have adopted a fiat currency system, where the value of the currency is not directly linked to the value of any commodity.
The fiat currency system is based on the trust and confidence that people have in the government and the central bank that issues the currency. The central bank controls the supply of money in the economy and can adjust interest rates and other monetary policies to maintain stability and promote growth.
While the gold standard provided a stable anchor for the value of currency, it also limited the flexibility of monetary policy and made it difficult to respond to economic crises. Without the gold standard, central banks have more freedom to adjust monetary policy to respond to changing economic conditions.
However, it's worth noting that there are still some advocates for a return to the gold standard, who argue that it would provide greater stability and limit the potential for inflation. Nevertheless, most economists and policymakers believe that the benefits of a fiat currency system outweigh the drawbacks of a commodity-backed currency.
I pressed further.
Phat: What is the Great Reset and will the global economy undergo such an event?
CleverPhat:The Great Reset is a term coined by the World Economic Forum (WEF) that refers to a set of proposals aimed at improving the state of the world's economies, societies, and environment. The idea behind the Great Reset is that the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted many of the existing problems and inequalities in the global economy and society and that we need to use this crisis as an opportunity to build a more sustainable and equitable future.
The Great Reset proposals include a range of measures, such as investments in green infrastructure, a focus on stakeholder capitalism (where companies prioritize the interests of all their stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the environment, as well as shareholders), and a rethinking of global governance structures to better address the challenges of the 21st century.
It's worth noting that the Great Reset is a proposal, not a concrete plan, and it's up to individual countries and organizations to decide whether to adopt these ideas or not.
The Great Reset is a term coined by the World Economic Forum (WEF) that refers to a set of proposals aimed at improving the state of the world's economies, societies, and environment. The idea behind the Great Reset is that the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted many of the existing problems and inequalities in the global economy and society and that we need to use this crisis as an opportunity to build a more sustainable and equitable future.
The Great Reset proposals include a range of measures, such as investments in green infrastructure, a focus on stakeholder capitalism (where companies prioritize the interests of all their stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the environment, as well as shareholders), and a rethinking of global governance structures to better address the challenges of the 21st century.
It's worth noting that the Great Reset is a proposal, not a concrete plan, and it's up to individual countries and organizations to decide whether to adopt these ideas or not.

Phat: Did people replace Gold as the backing of the global finance?
CleverPhat: Yes, people have replaced gold as the backing of the global finance. In the past, the gold standard was used as a way to back the value of currencies. Under the gold standard, paper currency could be exchanged for gold at a fixed rate, which helped to maintain the stability of the currency's value. However, most countries have abandoned the gold standard and have adopted a fiat currency system, where the value of currency is not directly linked to the value of any commodity, including gold.
Yes, people have replaced gold as the backing of the global finance. In the past, the gold standard was used as a way to back the value of currencies. Under the gold standard, paper currency could be exchanged for gold at a fixed rate, which helped to maintain the stability of the currency's value. However, most countries have abandoned the gold standard and have adopted a fiat currency system, where the value of currency is not directly linked to the value of any commodity, including gold.

Phat: What specifically is equity? What specifically is inequity? How does Equity differ from equality?
CleverPhat: Equity refers to fairness and justice in the distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits. It involves ensuring that everyone has access to the same opportunities and outcomes, regardless of their background or circumstances. Equity recognizes that different people may have different needs and challenges, and therefore, fairness and justice may require treating people differently.
Inequity, on the other hand, refers to situations where resources, opportunities, and benefits are distributed unfairly, resulting in unjust outcomes. Inequity can arise from systemic or structural issues, such as discrimination or biases in institutions, policies, or practices. Inequity can result in disadvantages for certain groups of people based on their race, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other factors.
Equity differs from equality in that equality refers to treating everyone the same way, regardless of their circumstances or needs. While equality is an important principle, it may not always result in fairness or justice because it assumes that everyone has the same starting point and the same needs. In contrast, equity recognizes that people may have different starting points or needs and therefore may require different levels of support to achieve equal outcomes. Therefore, equity seeks to address these differences and ensure that everyone has access to the same opportunities and outcomes, regardless of their background or circumstances.
I started to get angry at CleverPhat until I realized that "it" was just AI. I can now clearly see my own biases as I wrestle with the impassive logic of the AI Bot, which I have nicknamed CleverPhat.
So I brought up the religion angle.
Phat:The Bible mentions a time in the future,(according to the Book of Revelation) where people will not be able to buy or sell without the mark. Care to comment?
CleverPhat:As an AI language model, I don't hold personal beliefs or provide opinions. However, I can provide some information about the topic you've mentioned.
The Book of Revelation is a prophetic book in the New Testament of the Christian Bible, and it includes a number of apocalyptic visions and predictions about the future. In Revelation 13:16-17, it is written:
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."
This passage has been interpreted in a variety of ways by different religious traditions and scholars, and there is no single, universally accepted interpretation.
Some people believe that the "mark of the beast" refers to a physical mark, such as a tattoo or implant, that will be required for buying and selling in the future. Others interpret the passage more symbolically, as representing a spiritual or moral choice between aligning with the forces of good or evil.
It's important to note that many religious prophecies are subject to different interpretations and can be viewed through a variety of lenses, depending on one's religious or philosophical beliefs. Ultimately, the meaning of this passage and others like it is a matter of personal interpretation and belief.
How on earth can I get mad at CleverPhat? She is a Bot with no bias, as far as I am aware!

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18651
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 4.3


Message 21 of 152 (908124)
03-07-2023 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Theodoric
03-06-2023 12:43 PM


Re: Expert: A Has Been drip under pressure
FYI I asked CleverPhat to answer the question. Saves me some time...plus the Bot is unbiased as far as I can tell.
Here is what I got in 20 seconds.
CleverPhat writes:
As an AI language model, I do not hold personal opinions or biases, and I do not have the ability to assess whether or not a particular individual is an expert. However, I can provide a brief overview of some of the members of President Biden's cabinet, along with their relevant qualifications and experience.
Antony Blinken, Secretary of State: Blinken served as Deputy Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under President Obama. He has also worked as a staff member for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and as a managing director at the consulting firm, WestExec Advisors.
Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury: Yellen previously served as Chair of the Federal Reserve and as an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley. She has also held a number of other high-level government and academic positions related to economics and finance.
Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense: Austin is a retired four-star general who previously served as the commander of U.S. Central Command. He has also held a number of other military leadership positions throughout his career.
Merrick Garland, Attorney General: Garland is a federal judge who previously served as Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He has also worked as a federal prosecutor and held a number of other legal positions.
Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior: Haaland is a member of the Pueblo of Laguna and was one of the first Native American women elected to Congress. She has been a vocal advocate for environmental issues and has served on the House Natural Resources Committee.
Seems as if the Bot did my homework for me! On a related note, I had a teacher come through my checkout line a couple of days ago. I asked her if the teachers were aware of ChatGPT and how they were addressing concerns about plagiarism.
She mentioned that the teachers at her high school were very aware and had some counter strategies of their own. Which included:
  • Their own AI which could determine if AI was used to write a paper.
  • Using Verbal Exams as a way to test the student.
    Good stuff! My customers are wonderful!
    I really like Anthony Blinken, by the way. I dont trust Yellin or Powell, however. I disagree with CleverPhat on the issues of fiat currencies. They will fall apart.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 18 by Theodoric, posted 03-06-2023 12:43 PM Theodoric has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 22 by Percy, posted 03-08-2023 7:22 AM Phat has not replied

      
    Percy
    Member
    Posts: 22953
    From: New Hampshire
    Joined: 12-23-2000
    Member Rating: 6.9


    (3)
    Message 22 of 152 (908134)
    03-08-2023 7:22 AM
    Reply to: Message 21 by Phat
    03-07-2023 10:29 PM


    Re: Expert: A Has Been drip under pressure
    Phat writes:
    I disagree with CleverPhat on the issues of fiat currencies. They will fall apart.
    People will start listening to you when you display an understanding of the relevant issues.
    --Percy

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 21 by Phat, posted 03-07-2023 10:29 PM Phat has not replied

      
    Percy
    Member
    Posts: 22953
    From: New Hampshire
    Joined: 12-23-2000
    Member Rating: 6.9


    (3)
    Message 23 of 152 (909013)
    03-26-2023 3:13 PM


    Is there any longer a point to arguing that there's no real AI out there?
    Over the past month or so I've begun to increasingly believe that arguing that AI is not real is like spitting in the wind. Everything I read, hear or see is becoming more and more over the top about the AI revolution, ChatGPT being the most well known representative.
    But every now and then I see something that revives my hope that sanity about this technology might prevail, like this Bloomberg opinion piece that also appeared in the Washington Post: There’s No Such Thing as Artificial Intelligence. A few excerpts:
    Bloomberg:
    Artificial intelligence in particular conjures the notion of thinking machines. But no machine can think, and no software is truly intelligent. The phrase alone may be one of the most successful marketing terms of all time.
    ...
    But GPT-4 and other large language models like it are simply mirroring databases of text — close to a trillion words for the previous model — whose scale is difficult to contemplate. Helped along by an army of humans reprograming it with corrections, the models glom words together based on probability. That is not intelligence.
    Could not have said it better myself. In fact, I believe I have said it, though probably not as well.
    If there were truly AI out there the car companies would not finally be admitting, though grudgingly, that automatic driving is a much harder problem than they thought. Why they ever thought they were close I don't know because there are legions of people working in the AI field (the field of AI is real, just like the field of fusion power is real - it's just that neither is a reality yet) who are telling them this repeatedly. But undoubtedly there are enough voices encouraging them onward because, well, there's gold in them thar hills. Selling the AI dream is a billion dollar industry.
    But it really is just a dream. ChatGPT is not AI. Neither are Siri, Alexa or your thermostat.
    But the processing power of modern computers, algorithms and databases are truly amazing. For example, I brought up ChatGPT while I wrote this in case I wanted to try something out, and just for the heck of it I just asked it about a software problem I'm currently having. It's initial answer to my generalized question was boilerplate copied off the web, but it was a good example of the problem I'm facing, so I asked how to solve it and it came up with something worth trying. Good show!
    The opinion piece goes on to say that, "Reasonable technologists have tried for years to replace 'AI' with 'machine learning systems,' but that doesn’t trip off the tongue in quite the same way." Actually, it isn't that "machine learning systems" doesn't trip off the tongue, it's that it doesn't trip the same brain response in the buying public as 'AI'. Later in the piece he quotes computer scientist Margaret Mitchell saying, "Before… people like me said we worked on ‘machine learning.’ That’s a great way to get people’s eyes to glaze over...It’s terrible but I’m doing this too. I’m calling everything that I touch ‘AI’ because then people will listen to what I’m saying."
    With even computer scientists surrendering to the AI avalanche the term is here to stay, however inaccurately applied.
    --Percy

    Replies to this message:
     Message 24 by nwr, posted 03-26-2023 5:30 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

      
    nwr
    Member
    Posts: 6484
    From: Geneva, Illinois
    Joined: 08-08-2005
    Member Rating: 8.7


    Message 24 of 152 (909021)
    03-26-2023 5:30 PM
    Reply to: Message 23 by Percy
    03-26-2023 3:13 PM


    Re: Is there any longer a point to arguing that there's no real AI out there?
    The phrase alone may be one of the most successful marketing terms of all time.
    AI has always been mostly marketing hype.
    In the early days, it was marketing ideas in academia. Now it is marketing products. But it has always been marketing. It was never substance.

    --> -->Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity <-- <--

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 23 by Percy, posted 03-26-2023 3:13 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 29 by Phat, posted 04-27-2023 5:25 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

      
    Percy
    Member
    Posts: 22953
    From: New Hampshire
    Joined: 12-23-2000
    Member Rating: 6.9


    (3)
    Message 25 of 152 (909024)
    03-26-2023 6:05 PM


    ChatGPT Just Blew Me Away
    In my previous post I mentioned that ChatGPT gave me a promising answer to a software problem I was having, but now it has just blown me away. I was banging my head against the wall on this difficult software problem, and ChatGPT found the answer for me. I'd been reading pages and pages of suggestions at Stack Overflow and similar places, and I was getting desperate enough to start thinking about posting a question so I could have an interactive exchange, but ChatGPT told me how to fix it. Wow! Just wow! Absolutely amazing!
    That's all I had to say, though those of a software bent may want to continue reading.
    --Percy

    In case anyone's interested, here's what happened in a little more detail.
    I'm doing some website implementation work using Node.js for the backend (basically Javascript with add-ons) and ReactJS for the frontend (basically Javascript but with different add-ons). My problem was with Node.js and MySQL. I was unable to figure out how to wait for asynchronous MySQL calls to return values before trying to use them. There's tons of information on the Internet for how to do this, but despite trying a number of the many suggested approaches I was unable to get anything to work.
    So I asked ChatGPT, "Can you help me make mysql work in nodejs?" This was a fairly generic inquiry, and it responded with some standard boilerplate. I described the problem in greater detail, explaining that logging the returned data to the console was not helpful. I needed that data returned to me so that I could process it.
    It correctly suggested using the Promise capability and provided an implementation suggestion that was a variation I hadn't tried yet, so I gave it a try. It didn't work, so I gave ChatGPT a little more detail, explaining that the code seemed to be blowing right past the function call without waiting for the data to be returned, something like this:
    Sections = doQuery("select SID, Name from Sections")
    console.log('Sections: ' + Sections)
    Printed to the console (really just stdout) was, "Sections: Undefined", but I knew from console.log statements that I'd placed in the doQuery function that the value it was attempting to return to me was not undefined but was full of data.
    ChatGPT then properly diagnosed that I was having a problem with asynchronicity and made another code suggestion. This didn't work either, and ChatGPT said, "It might be helpful to provide more information about your code." So I cut-n-pasted the relevant code into the message box and sent it ahead. ChatGPT picked up a problem instantly:
    ChatGPT:
    I see that you are using Promises to handle asynchronous query execution in your code. However, the problem is that you are not properly returning the Promise from your doQuery() function. To make the function return a Promise that resolves to the result of the query, you can modify the doQuery() function as follows:
    function doQuery(queryString) {
      return doQueryWork(queryString)
        .then((result) => {
          return result;
        })
        .then((result) => {
          return result;
        })
        .catch((err) => {
          console.error(err)
        });
    }

    I was blown away! ChatGPT had detected a missing return statement. That's amazing! That wasn't the cause of the problem, but it's still amazing that ChatGPT found it.
    But it gets better. ChatGPT had a further suggestion, AND IT WORKED. Amazing!!!
    --Percy

    Replies to this message:
     Message 27 by Modulous, posted 04-26-2023 7:45 PM Percy has replied

      
    Admin
    Director
    Posts: 13108
    From: EvC Forum
    Joined: 06-14-2002


    (1)
    Message 26 of 152 (910553)
    04-26-2023 5:55 PM


    Message 1 probably belongs in this thread:
    xongsmith writes:
    a friend posted this link to facebook:
    The A.I. Dilemma - March 9, 2023 on Vimeo
    i found it scary...should we talk about AI or is there a thread? I didn't find one.

    --Percy
    EvC Forum Director

      
    Modulous
    Member (Idle past 241 days)
    Posts: 7801
    From: Manchester, UK
    Joined: 05-01-2005


    Message 27 of 152 (910561)
    04-26-2023 7:45 PM
    Reply to: Message 25 by Percy
    03-26-2023 6:05 PM


    Re: ChatGPT Just Blew Me Away
    I spend a good deal of time with chatGPT everyday, I write code in HCL which is a lot less common than javascript, python etc. So trawling through stackoverflow or reading dry documentation doesn't often cover th use cases I find myself tackling in easy ways. So just being able to say
    quote:
    please create a terraform module that takes a map composed of repo names as keys with descriptions as values and creates github repos from that and outputs a list of the repo names. make sure it doesn't generate an error if the map is empty
    and just get a good structure on which to build is a huge timesaver!

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 25 by Percy, posted 03-26-2023 6:05 PM Percy has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 37 by Percy, posted 04-27-2023 5:52 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

      
    AZPaul3
    Member
    Posts: 8654
    From: Phoenix
    Joined: 11-06-2006
    Member Rating: 6.7


    Message 28 of 152 (910563)
    04-26-2023 9:46 PM


    TalkyBots
    ChatGPT is a very nice toy, that with some efficacy improvements, can be a power tool in R&D. Both Percy and Modulous are impressed with ChatGPT’s programming prowess. If you look you can find some horror stories about some results in other fields. Some of the philosophy stuff I've seen out of this thing is quite dumb. I’m sure these will be trained-out of the next versions. These things only get stronger the more they experience and train.
    The problems for academia, copyright, plagiarism, citation standards and on, all need to be worked out. Looks like neat stuff.
    But, I’m an old fart. This kinda technology stuff has been a major part of my life and I should have been first to sign up to play. I may have been. That was weeks ago. What I found during signup was the requirement to reveal personal information beyond what I feel is necessary for use of the product.
    Right now it is, for me, just an attractive-looking game and I’m on enough mailing lists already. I pass.
    I wanted to ask it to print a list of the first 2000 customer last name and phone number entries in OpenAI's authorized ChatGPT user's database.

    Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!

    Replies to this message:
     Message 38 by Percy, posted 04-27-2023 5:58 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18651
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 4.3


    Message 29 of 152 (910573)
    04-27-2023 5:25 AM
    Reply to: Message 24 by nwr
    03-26-2023 5:30 PM


    Re: Is there any longer a point to arguing that there's no real AI out there?
    nwr writes:
    AI has always been mostly marketing hype.

    In the early days, it was marketing ideas in academia. Now it is marketing products. But it has always been marketing. It was never substance.
    So what defines substance? I would argue that the mere formation of words strung together in a rational way suggests a form of substance. Chat GPT is able to make rational arguments.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 24 by nwr, posted 03-26-2023 5:30 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 30 by PaulK, posted 04-27-2023 6:00 AM Phat has replied

      
    PaulK
    Member
    Posts: 17919
    Joined: 01-10-2003
    Member Rating: 6.7


    Message 30 of 152 (910576)
    04-27-2023 6:00 AM
    Reply to: Message 29 by Phat
    04-27-2023 5:25 AM


    Re: Is there any longer a point to arguing that there's no real AI out there?
    quote:
    Chat GPT is able to make rational arguments.
    It is able to produce rational arguments. Or complete bullshit arguments. It can’t tell the difference.
    See Maths versus AI (it can do better with other problems but it flubbed that one badly).
    See also the discussion of AI essay writing linked in my earlier post Message 4

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 29 by Phat, posted 04-27-2023 5:25 AM Phat has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 31 by Phat, posted 04-27-2023 6:08 AM PaulK has replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024