It changes the whole idea of indigenous culture and population models.
Why? There is less than 10,000 years to add to the mix. That's not a lot.
I am missing something. I can't see where this is any more controversial than a data update in the spreadsheet.
What does that 10,000 year span mean to the indigenous culture? The population was here earlier than we thought. They did the same thing as in our other scenario only earlier and longer. So what controversy is this thing fixing?
Sorry. Let me think on this.
Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!