The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

Oh my goodness, you really do not how to follow and conduct real science!1. ID is concern mainly in the topic of the kind or type of "change" since Darwin and supporters of Evolution had messed this difficult topic. So that Darwin and Evolutionists could continue their science explanations, they neglected the topic of intelligence and quickly concluded non-intelligence, or natural. To support their conclusion, they concluded Natural Selection, and not Intelligent Selection. By doing this, those ignorant supporters of Evolution really dismissed the topic of intelligence, concluding further that the change of frequency alleles are always non-intelligence or natural.2. ID had discovered the actual topic of intelligence and non-intelligence, (it should be done first by Evolutionist) which means, any topic in Biology, like the topic of change, could now be categorized if the change is directed by intelligence or not. The conclusion was that the change of freq alleles is guided by intelligence, since life, is part or product of intelligence. To falsify this, critics must redefine intelligence with experiment, and fight side by side with ID.3. Then, ID has new model to compete with Biol Evolu. The new theory is Biological Interrelation, BiTs. The differences are very simple:
a. Evolution is dead on intelligence, thus, wrong, while BiTs knows about intelligence and is correct.
b. The change is intelligently guided change, since intelligence and its variant words are part of reality.4. Now, Biological Interrelation had refuted almost all explanations from erroneous Evolution. Thus, any topic from Evolution are based on non-intelligence change a stupid conclusion from Evolutionists.

I knew that Evolution claimed about natural (non-intelligent) processes, that has no intelligence.But what is the dividing line between intelligent to non-intelligent?Where is the line and what is the criteria?Where is the test to show the claim from Evolution?

When you say "PRODUCT", you knew very well that it requires a criteria, either intelligent had been used or not...Then, tell me, what is that criteria?I and ID are late comer in science and not funded by taxes. Now, Evolution should be doing that first, proving and showing that Evolution is real theory.So, where is the criteria and its test from Evolution about the dividing line between intelligent and not?

That is why you need to make criteria first, since if the biological world has intelligence, then, the biological world must be parsimonious and spontaneous, controlled by intelligence for life. Thus, Evolution has nothing to do with Biology. Evolution really is an stupid theory.

It really shows that Evolution is an stupid theory since both Evolution and you have no criteria in dealing with biological world. Which means that Biological Interrelation, a new model for Biology, as formulated by Intelligent Design, is the only correct theory since Biological Interrelation, BiTs, is supported by many criteria, as discovered by Intelligent Design.Thank you for showing me how stupid Evolution is.

OK, when I said criteria, I mean, the criteria if the change that are happening inside the cell is guided or controlled or manipulated or not, the same way transitions and transversion is needing criteria inside the cell that need numerical limits, as criteria, to explain two scenarios.There is no nested hierarchy since Evolution is wrong. Nested hierarchy was an invention of Evolution that is not part of reality in Biology, thus, Biological Interrelation cannot invent like fairy tale about something that never existed.

Before Evolution could conclude that an X was following an spontaneous process, first and foremost, Evolution and you must make criteria or limits betweenspontaneous guided X
non-spontaneous guided Xand conclude. Please, show how you derive that with experiment.The objective goal with scientific criteria for Biological Interrelation, BiTs, is to put real science in the right rail, on the right track since Evolution had derailed science and Biology. Which means, Evolution is wrong in everything, thus BiTs will replace Evolution, per reality. Evolution is not part of reality. Thus, everything that are written or published with the words Evolution must be replaced, unless those published articles criticized Evolution, and replaced all with Interrelation.For example, if Evolution is change in frequency alleles with no control, then, BiTs will
explain, based on reality thatInterrelation is change in frequency alleles with control.. that is what we are observing, that is what we must be explaining and telling.

Only the new ID could explain the correct explanation of Gravity.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO6Tqr02ENQ&lc=UgywRafvDY...

I am not confused about GR. I am totally fine. You are confused.

I repeated it so that you will know that you are wrong.

FIRST, I did not invent intelligence. It was our dictionaries and many people who had invented 71 definitions of intelligence.SECOND, we do not know GRAVITON, but we could easily know squeezon.

I am not delusional. I am solving the question of "WHAT IS GRAVITY?"

I am not confused, nwr, I think that you are very confused.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ags-sbU06WI

Well, you can see the differences and I am solving if there is really a dark energy, but I am starting at the basic. Many of you really do not know about gravity.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ags-sbU06WI

This is the thread that I had started about the new ID and the new ID is so powerful that it could also explain PHYSICS, like gravity, thus, you are probably ignoramous of that topic.