|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:So, AZPaul3 can offer an explanation. Why doesn't AZPaul3 explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:It is worse than nonsense and superstition, it is harmful and destructive. Kleinman:These biologists have laymen thinking they are related to fecal bacteria. I'm impressed with their ability to do a con job.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:Darwin got some things right, he correctly described descent with modification and adaptation, and biological competition. However, he didn't do the mathematics. Biologists have done ok when it comes to doing the mathematics of biological competition but failed to understand how it affects descent with modification and adaptation. If Darwin and biologists had done the mathematics of descent with modification and adaptation correctly, they would have seen that universal common descent is not possible. Darwin had a good excuse, he had no awareness of DNA or mutations, biologists on the other hand, have no excuse for their blunders and ongoing con job.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Tangle:Can't you think of any new lines? This is the same stupid argument people like you come up with when they can't explain how drug resistance evolves or why cancer treatments fail. By the way, I learned in engineering school that if you put big enough engine on anything, you can make it fly. Since I haven't brought up bumble bees anywhere in this discussion, only the physics and mathematics of biological evolution, explain why it takes a billion replications for each adaptive step in the Kishony and Lenski experiments. Or are you one of those biologists that think that experimentation and mathematics has no place in scientific analysis?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:That's only the beginning of the story. The Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments are performed in a single selection environment. In a multiple selection pressure environment, the number of replications necessary for adaptation goes up exponentially. That's why 3-drug combination therapy (3 selection pressures) works for the treatment of HIV. Even HIV cannot reach a population size for descent with modification and adaptation to work when the evolutionary process has to evolve to 3 simultaneous selection conditions. That is what this mathematics is all about. Are chimps and humans related? No way, you just don't have the population size for this kind of evolutionary process to happen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:Perhaps if they put some Starship Enterprise impulse engines on their idea of UCD, they could make it fly, at warped mind speed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:Oh, I like fairytales. When we were young we got Mother Goose, and now that we are older, we get Papa Gander.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:Have a happy and joyous resurrection day.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 334 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:Don't you know the policy, you need to post on topic. Perhaps you want to try and do the mathematics of descent with modification and adaptation and explain why it takes a billion replications for each adaptive mutation in the Kishony and Lenski experiments? Here are two publications that show how the math is done. For the Kishony experiment which evolves in an environment with a single selection pressure and with minimal competition such that fixation is not required: The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection And for the Lenski experiment which evolves in an environment with a single selection pressure but has intense competition such that fixation is required at each adaptive mutational step: Fixation and Adaptation in the Lenski E. coli Long Term Evolution Experiment If you find the mathematics hard to understand when fixation and adaptation must both occur for the evolutionary process, here is a short presentation video that explains the steps in detail for the Lenski experiment: The Lenski Long Term Evolution Experiment dwise1, if you feel that the mathematics is wrong, point out the error(s). If you think the physics is wrong, point that out. I don't think you will find any errors in either the math or the physics. This mathematics very closely fits the behavior of both the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments and biologists have not understood or presented the behavior of either experiment correctly.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024