Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 51 (9179 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,177 Year: 5,434/9,624 Month: 459/323 Week: 99/204 Day: 15/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Power of the New Intelligent Design...
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 526 of 1197 (902204)
11-18-2022 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 524 by Taq
11-18-2022 10:40 AM


Oh my goodness, you really do not how to follow and conduct real science!
1. ID is concern mainly in the topic of the kind or type of "change" since Darwin and supporters of Evolution had messed this difficult topic. So that Darwin and Evolutionists could continue their science explanations, they neglected the topic of intelligence and quickly concluded non-intelligence, or natural. To support their conclusion, they concluded Natural Selection, and not Intelligent Selection. By doing this, those ignorant supporters of Evolution really dismissed the topic of intelligence, concluding further that the change of frequency alleles are always non-intelligence or natural.
2. ID had discovered the actual topic of intelligence and non-intelligence, (it should be done first by Evolutionist) which means, any topic in Biology, like the topic of change, could now be categorized if the change is directed by intelligence or not. The conclusion was that the change of freq alleles is guided by intelligence, since life, is part or product of intelligence. To falsify this, critics must redefine intelligence with experiment, and fight side by side with ID.
3. Then, ID has new model to compete with Biol Evolu. The new theory is Biological Interrelation, BiTs. The differences are very simple:
a. Evolution is dead on intelligence, thus, wrong, while BiTs knows about intelligence and is correct.
b. The change is intelligently guided change, since intelligence and its variant words are part of reality.
4. Now, Biological Interrelation had refuted almost all explanations from erroneous Evolution. Thus, any topic from Evolution are based on non-intelligence change a stupid conclusion from Evolutionists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 524 by Taq, posted 11-18-2022 10:40 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 527 by Taq, posted 11-21-2022 10:52 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 528 of 1197 (902381)
11-23-2022 3:05 AM
Reply to: Message 527 by Taq
11-21-2022 10:52 AM


I knew that Evolution claimed about natural (non-intelligent) processes, that has no intelligence.
But what is the dividing line between intelligent to non-intelligent?
Where is the line and what is the criteria?
Where is the test to show the claim from Evolution?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 527 by Taq, posted 11-21-2022 10:52 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 529 by AZPaul3, posted 11-23-2022 3:21 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 533 by Taq, posted 11-23-2022 10:37 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 530 of 1197 (902383)
11-23-2022 6:25 AM
Reply to: Message 529 by AZPaul3
11-23-2022 3:21 AM


When you say "PRODUCT", you knew very well that it requires a criteria, either intelligent had been used or not...
Then, tell me, what is that criteria?
I and ID are late comer in science and not funded by taxes. Now, Evolution should be doing that first, proving and showing that Evolution is real theory.
So, where is the criteria and its test from Evolution about the dividing line between intelligent and not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 529 by AZPaul3, posted 11-23-2022 3:21 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 531 by nwr, posted 11-23-2022 7:51 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 532 by AZPaul3, posted 11-23-2022 8:42 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 534 by Taq, posted 11-23-2022 10:39 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 535 of 1197 (904093)
12-21-2022 6:34 PM
Reply to: Message 534 by Taq
11-23-2022 10:39 AM


The main criteria is spontaneity. If it can occur on its own through natural processes then intelligence is ruled out by parsimony. You would need additional evidence of an intelligence in order to conclude one was involved.
That is why you need to make criteria first, since if the biological world has intelligence, then, the biological world must be parsimonious and spontaneous, controlled by intelligence for life. Thus, Evolution has nothing to do with Biology. Evolution really is an stupid theory.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 534 by Taq, posted 11-23-2022 10:39 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 538 by Taq, posted 12-22-2022 11:58 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 536 of 1197 (904094)
12-21-2022 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 531 by nwr
11-23-2022 7:51 AM


You are the person who has been making a big deal over intelligence. It is up to you to provide the criteria.
It really shows that Evolution is an stupid theory since both Evolution and you have no criteria in dealing with biological world. Which means that Biological Interrelation, a new model for Biology, as formulated by Intelligent Design, is the only correct theory since Biological Interrelation, BiTs, is supported by many criteria, as discovered by Intelligent Design.
Thank you for showing me how stupid Evolution is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 531 by nwr, posted 11-23-2022 7:51 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 537 by Taq, posted 12-22-2022 11:54 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 539 of 1197 (904287)
12-25-2022 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 537 by Taq
12-22-2022 11:54 AM


There are many, many criteria that scientists use in biology and within the theory of evolution. The problem is that you don't understand any of them.


Then how does your model explain why we see a nested hierarchy? Why do we see more sequence conservation in exons than in introns? Why do we see more transitions than transversions when comparing genomes?

Evolution can explain all of these observations. Can "Biological Interrelation" explain these observations? If not, it is a failed model.
OK, when I said criteria, I mean, the criteria if the change that are happening inside the cell is guided or controlled or manipulated or not, the same way transitions and transversion is needing criteria inside the cell that need numerical limits, as criteria, to explain two scenarios.
There is no nested hierarchy since Evolution is wrong. Nested hierarchy was an invention of Evolution that is not part of reality in Biology, thus, Biological Interrelation cannot invent like fairy tale about something that never existed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 537 by Taq, posted 12-22-2022 11:54 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 541 by Taq, posted 12-27-2022 10:50 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 540 of 1197 (904288)
12-25-2022 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 538 by Taq
12-22-2022 11:58 AM


The criteria have been in place for hundreds of years.

If nature operates through spontaneous events then it is not controlled by intelligence. That's the criteria. We observe that the evidence in biology is consistent with spontaneous events. That is why Evolution has everything to do with Biology.

Thus far, Biological Interrelation can't even explain the most basic observations in biology. BI has no objective criteria, just whatever you subjectively decide is designed. It all boils down to "whatever MrIntelligentDesign decides to say that day". That's no criteria at all.
Before Evolution could conclude that an X was following an spontaneous process, first and foremost, Evolution and you must make criteria or limits between
spontaneous guided X
non-spontaneous guided X
and conclude. Please, show how you derive that with experiment.
The objective goal with scientific criteria for Biological Interrelation, BiTs, is to put real science in the right rail, on the right track since Evolution had derailed science and Biology. Which means, Evolution is wrong in everything, thus BiTs will replace Evolution, per reality. Evolution is not part of reality. Thus, everything that are written or published with the words Evolution must be replaced, unless those published articles criticized Evolution, and replaced all with Interrelation.
For example, if Evolution is change in frequency alleles with no control, then, BiTs will
explain, based on reality that
Interrelation is change in frequency alleles with control.. that is what we are observing, that is what we must be explaining and telling.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 538 by Taq, posted 12-22-2022 11:58 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 542 by Taq, posted 12-27-2022 10:52 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1169 of 1197 (909576)
04-06-2023 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 1166 by Taq
03-30-2023 10:43 AM


ONLY THE new ID could explain
Only the new ID could explain the correct explanation of Gravity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO6Tqr02ENQ&lc=UgywRafvDY...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1166 by Taq, posted 03-30-2023 10:43 AM Taq has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1170 by nwr, posted 04-06-2023 11:18 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1179 of 1197 (909766)
04-11-2023 5:00 AM
Reply to: Message 1170 by nwr
04-06-2023 11:18 AM


Re: ONLY THE new ID could explain
I am not confused about GR. I am totally fine. You are confused.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1170 by nwr, posted 04-06-2023 11:18 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1185 by nwr, posted 04-11-2023 11:49 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1180 of 1197 (909767)
04-11-2023 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1172 by nwr
04-06-2023 1:52 PM


Re: ONLY THE new ID could explain
I repeated it so that you will know that you are wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1172 by nwr, posted 04-06-2023 1:52 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1181 of 1197 (909768)
04-11-2023 5:03 AM
Reply to: Message 1174 by AZPaul3
04-06-2023 7:00 PM


FIRST, I did not invent intelligence. It was our dictionaries and many people who had invented 71 definitions of intelligence.
SECOND, we do not know GRAVITON, but we could easily know squeezon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1174 by AZPaul3, posted 04-06-2023 7:00 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1183 by AZPaul3, posted 04-11-2023 6:35 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1182 of 1197 (909769)
04-11-2023 5:04 AM
Reply to: Message 1177 by Tanypteryx
04-07-2023 1:52 PM


I am not delusional. I am solving the question of "WHAT IS GRAVITY?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1177 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-07-2023 1:52 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1184 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-11-2023 10:36 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1186 of 1197 (910196)
04-19-2023 5:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1185 by nwr
04-11-2023 11:49 AM


Re: ONLY THE new ID could explain
I am not confused, nwr, I think that you are very confused.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ags-sbU06WI

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1185 by nwr, posted 04-11-2023 11:49 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1188 by Theodoric, posted 04-19-2023 8:17 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1187 of 1197 (910197)
04-19-2023 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 1184 by Tanypteryx
04-11-2023 10:36 AM


Someone already did that, and you haven't added anything new, so yeah, you are delusional. The BIG QUESTION is WHAT IS DARK ENERGY?
Well, you can see the differences and I am solving if there is really a dark energy, but I am starting at the basic. Many of you really do not know about gravity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ags-sbU06WI

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1184 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-11-2023 10:36 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 1189 of 1197 (910258)
04-20-2023 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1188 by Theodoric
04-19-2023 8:17 AM


Re: troll alert
Irrelevant and against forum rules. Are you just a troll?
This is the thread that I had started about the new ID and the new ID is so powerful that it could also explain PHYSICS, like gravity, thus, you are probably ignoramous of that topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1188 by Theodoric, posted 04-19-2023 8:17 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1190 by Theodoric, posted 04-20-2023 7:48 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 1191 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-20-2023 11:29 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024