|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
GrannyMagda writes:
Satan will not allow the scientific world to take creationism and ID seriously. Satan is using science to promote atheism, which is what Darwinian evolution is all about.
if you want these ideas to be taken seriously in the scientific world,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
sensei writes:
Well said. Darwinoids like APauling are afraid of the light and see only what they want to see. All contrary evidence is blissfully ignored ... or explained away in some lame manner.
If that is all you see, then your knowledge is very limited.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Science is too puny and shallow to even detect Satan's existence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
APauling666 writes:
aka wilful denial and delusion. But it ain't that powerful ... any fool can do it.
That is my fault. As we know the human mind is so powerful we can vanquish any gods and their minions to oblivion with a simple thought.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Grumpy Magda writes:
ID claims to detect the existence of demons? I didn't know that.
So much for the power of intelligent design then.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
So you think evidence equates to knowing. Interesting logic, but what a pity it's unscientific. We do know what happened. We have the evidence. Plz take the time to learn the difference between belief and knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
APauling666 writes:
How do you define "define"? And while you at it, how do you define "How"?
How do you define context?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
That reasoning is unknown to science.
I can prove it, beyond any reasonable doubt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
APauling666 writes:
Plz don't use the word "preponderance " again. It's much too big for my fragile, eggshell mind to digest and it's not even a real word. Grow up.
He was trying to not confuse you with the bigger concepts that would hurt your brain, like 'preponderance of evidence'.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Science can't prove that your atheist evolution bedtime-story is true ... that's all I need to know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Don't cha just luv the the way they claim they "know" when they can't prove they "know" and all they have is a theory that supports their atheism? They're either pathologically delusional or they're liars and con-men. Either way, they're full of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Funny one, sensei!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
You can't prove it scientifically, so stop talking like a liar and a fool.
I can prove it
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
Firstly, you can't prove that any of those skulls are "transitional". They're chosen and displayed in a manner that may look transitional to some. If those skulls are not transitional, then please tell us what features these skulls are missing that a real transitional skull would have. Secondly, please explain why none of the skeletons belonging to the non-human skulls in that image provide any evidence of being transitional. They're no closer to human than the skeletons of the non-human primates we see today. In other words, you got a huge gap between the skeletons of ancient non-human primates and those of humans.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
Translation: For humans and most mammals, somewhere around 90-95% of the genome is junk. "We scientist like to claim it's 90-95% "junk" bcoz (a) we don't know what its function is, and (b) finding lots of "junk" DNA in genomes supports our beloved theory of evolution."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024