Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   3 Theories Of Everything by Ellis Potter
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(2)
Message 66 of 99 (881988)
09-07-2020 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Phat
09-07-2020 3:10 PM


Re: What Is Comfortable vs What is True.
quote:
As I also said, Perhaps you are more evidence based and logical than I am and see no need for consideration of a Creator for which there likely never be evidence. My perception of a Creator is personal while yours is likely hypothetical.
I do have other reasons, such as the incoherence of Christianity.
As for your personal reasons I will point out that any have similar reasons and come to beliefs significantly different from yours. Such reasons are clearly not reliable guides to the truth.
quote:
Granted that is true, but I perceive science as trying to define reality based only on what it has to work with. There is nothing personal about science.
We have to work with what we have. And science, unlike apologetics, has appropriate modesty (even if some practitioners fall short) and a good deal of internal criticism and correction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Phat, posted 09-07-2020 3:10 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(1)
Message 96 of 99 (883920)
01-17-2021 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Phat
01-17-2021 3:32 PM


Re: Truth is in the mind
quote:
Potter was once a Buddhist. He evolved beyond Monism and Dualism and embraced Trinitarianism. (More specifically, Trinitarian Monotheism.)
By which you mean he decided to declare his beliefs superior to everyone else’s without bothering to understand what he was rubbishing. That isn’t my idea of evolved.
quote:
So here is a question for jar. Is Logic, Reason, and Reality three separate concepts?
They are certainly not identical. Logic is a formalised subset of Reason, for instance. Reality would be everything that actually exists, as it actually exists, so I suppose it would include Reason (or at least actual instances of Reason - but perhaps we had better not get into the question of whether abstracts exist).
quote:
I am rereading the book in light of jars challenge regarding Trinitarian Monotheism vs Monotheism (or perhaps in jars mind, Monism. Allah is a Monistic God. He had no son nor is he in communion with anybody)
No. Allah is a monotheistic God. A monistic God (as Potter means it) would be pantheism which is not mainstream Islamic thought any more than it is mainstream Christian thought.
(Pantheism is derived from the same roots as Pantheon - but they aren’t otherwise related.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Phat, posted 01-17-2021 3:32 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(1)
Message 98 of 99 (908420)
03-14-2023 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Phat
03-14-2023 2:49 PM


Re: A One & A Two & A Three
Perhaps you should review my previous posts in this thread. There is sufficient there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Phat, posted 03-14-2023 2:49 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Phat, posted 03-15-2023 1:27 PM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024