Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

You are not my boss, blind noob

Whether or not ice stops melting tomorrow, does not change the fact that ice has been proven to have melt upto now. That is fact. I made no claim about any future.

Keep talking like an ignorant troll.

The heat was an example. Fact remains that ice can melt.

More usseless and inaccurate claims.

No, you are making the dumbest claims. The kind of evidence for ice melting is very much different than the evidence for evolution. Sorry, your stupidity does not work on me.

You are insulting with your lame claims. Argue with facts or zip it, as I have no use for your opinions and vague assertions.

Many things produce nested hierarchies. Keep ignoring that fact and proving your utter ignorance.

Go ahead and name the 100 million. I'm waiting.

There are people in science who are humble enough to recognize the limitations of our science. And there are people who are more haughty when posting scientific findings as absolute truth.

Percy:

---

Do you have any examples of scientists making claims of absolute truth?

---

Every scientist who claims UCA is a fact, basically posts it as absolute truth, if you ask me. Do you agree on this or do you see it differently?Dawkins does it, I think. Among many others.

Let me ask you this question then.Do you consider it to be a fact that humand and chimps share a common ancestor?

Many scientist claim similar things along the line that common ancestry is (scientific) fact. You can simply ask them directly yourself when you encounter one. I don't remember every conversation or comment.If you find ask ten scientist and find that all of them deny common ancestry to be a fact, then you win. But until then, you have nothing but dumb accusation, while you yourself post it as absolute scientific truth.

You are always hostile, aren't you.If something is not 100% certain, you cannot call it a fact, whether you add "scientific" or not.You can disagree all you want, but you are just being hypocrite, posting absolutes while pretending not to.

You should learn to spell words before you comment.Problem with you bunch, is that you are contradicting each other. Some "scientists" say facts don't exist in science, while other "scientists" call many things scientific facts.Many "scientists" say nothing in science can be proven, but that is simply not true. There have been theories about things in nature, that have later been directly observed with new technology, better microscopes and such.Your problem is, you take something as true, just because some scientist has said it. And you hold on to it with your dear life, as an absolute dogma, and all you can do to defend it, is to call people stupid when they disagree with your illogical ideas.