Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

We seen solid ice turn into liquid water, recorded it, felt it, every single person (over 99.99%) has observed it themselves, so it is a fact that ice can turn into water. As certain as can be.

No, you don't. You can't show a one.You are a liar, sensei.

Hahaha, you have lied over and over again, hypocrite!

Liar. You have no data that falls outside of common ancestor prediction.And you try to cover up your lie with more lies.Intellectually deficient religious nutjob. Typical.

You are not my boss, blind noob

Ooo. Grade school. How chic.

Where is this data that falls outside of common ancestor predictions? Do you have any? Do you have ANYTHING that questions the concept?No. You don't.You lied. Knowingly and willingly.Serious, sensei, you could be so damn dumb as to think you could get away with such bullshit?This is the put-up or shut-up stage, sensei. Of course we already know you are incapable of either.

That's all evidence. But you have repeatedly told us that evidence is not proof.So you cannot be absolutely certain. Maybe tomorrow, ice will stop melting with heat. How can be certain that won't happen?

Whether or not ice stops melting tomorrow, does not change the fact that ice has been proven to have melt upto now. That is fact. I made no claim about any future.

Keep talking like an ignorant troll.

So you can't answer the question?Where is this data that falls outside of common ancestor predictions? Do you have any? Do you have ANYTHING that questions the concept?You claim you have killer data. Where?It's not real is it. That is why you can't engage. You have nothing but bluster.

No, this has not been proven. There likely have been many instances of ice that has not been observed. What has been observed is evidence. And evidence is not proof, as you yourself have been telling us.The idea that ice melts with heat is an extrapolation from the observed evidence. I'll accept that it is fact, but not that it is proved. It's an example of us deciding what is fact based on sufficient evidence. And it contradicts your claim that proof is required before something can be called a fact.

The heat was an example. Fact remains that ice can melt.

Theories explain why we observe ice melting in certain situations, and those theories are supported by the same types of evidence and logic that is used in the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution is no different than any other scientific theory.

More usseless and inaccurate claims.