Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

All of lifes complexity, which you evolutionists so poorly understand, it's just pathetic!

If you cannot point out where you got your false perception from and fix it yourself, you may never learn.

You made false claims about what I said and misreprented my views. And now you pretend that you did none of those.If you describe life as a nested hierarchy and conclude that it is due to evolution from a common ancestry, then that is your conclusion. Not mine!That does not mean that I think evolution could or would not result in some sort of nested tree. That is where your logic goes wrong.If we find a dead body and you assume that it is from murder, I would say that it could also be from an accident, from disease or from old age. Does that mean that I don't think that murder would result in a dead body?So if you want an honest discussion, I suggest you take back your words. And also, most of your questions seem to be based on this misunderstanding on your part.I don't deny at all, that some sort of nested pattern could arise if life had evolved. Do you understand this?

Who says my pronouncing was for the purpose of falsifying anything?

Babies grow starting with all necessary DNA alreasdy present. Not from nothing.

Dishonest as ever. You still stand by your misrepresentation of my stance, and refuse to take back. Then zip it, and leave the debate to people who don't lie and misrepresent.

Prove it. Where have I lied?You evolutionist are just the same dishonest fools as ever.

So you accuse me of lying because I don't share your false and ridiculous belief?Hahahha, the circular reasoning of the dishonest evolutionist in full display!

Hahaha, nested pattern and poor logic is hardly worth it to call evidence. You made so many errors in your logic already, your opinion is worthless to me.

Still don't care about your opinion.

You don't know what facts are. A fact is something that is true with absolute certainty. Your flawed theory of common descent is not. Keep lying, as dishonest as you evolutionists are.

Who says it is full of bullet holes? Ifs are irrelevant.If we could turn back time and see how and where life originated, that would prove one or the other.Also, you are missing the point. Doubting the cause of death does not mean that murder does not result in death. Your side seems to think so nonetheless, which is a logical fallacy. But you fail to recognize it, so you may never learn.

We are discussing how DNA evolved. Not how already evolved DNA forms a body. Stick to the topic.

And once again you managed to miss the point completely.

Sure, in your puny little mind.