Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Kleinman:

---

Now which bacteria is he descended from.

ringo:

---

Again... it's what common ancestor that WE (including you) and modern bacteria are ALL descended from.

---

---

I get your claim. Your horse is related to fecal bacteria, cows are related to fecal bacteria, and you are related to fecal bacteria but you don't know which bacteria you descended from. Drug-resistant bacteria are also descended from drug-sensitive bacteria and they are also related to drug-sensitive bacteria but you don't know how or why this happens. The fake cowboy seems to know what happened millions of years ago but doesn't know what is happening right now.

You really don't. You demonstrate that by repeating the same old same old misconception over and over and over again. WE (including YOU) are related to horses and to cows and to fecal bacteria. Nor do you know precisely which anti-Roman German you are descended from. What you do not know does not determine what actually happened. You CLAIM (without evidence) that I don't know how this happens but you DEMONSTRATE that YOU do not understand simple mathematics. You RUN AWAY from questions about simple mathematics. And the ignorant Kleinman claims to know that I am a "fake cowboy". He couldn't possibly know that.

Kleinman:

---

I get your claim.

ringo:

---

You really don't.

---

---

Sure I do fake cowboy. You fantasize about something you imagine happened millions of years ago but can't figure out what happens now. Perhaps you should apply your math, DU → MB.

No you don't. And you have no way of knowing whether I am a fake cowboy or a real cowboy. YOU fantasize about biology when you know nothing about biology. YOU fantasize about mathematics when you know nothing about mathematics. YOU can't figure out the difference between relatedness and descent. YOU can't figure out the difference between asexual reproduction and sexual reproduction. When YOU understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B →C, you can try to talk to the gownups.

Kleinman:

---

Sure I do fake cowboy.

ringo:

---

No you don't. And you have no way of knowing whether I am a fake cowboy or a real cowboy.

---

---

Yeah, right, you are really Sharon Stone. And you don't know which bacteria you descended from but you are related to fecal bacteria. And you know this because your mathematics is DU → MB. Are you going to remake your movie and call it "The Slow and the Dumb"?

Message received and understood:

• You are still a completely clueless idiot who is abjectly ignorant of biology, evolution, how to apply mathematics (being good with multiplication tables is worthless if you don't know what to multiple and when), and just about everything else.
• You have chosen to waste the bandwidth of 1660 messages to repeatedly demonstrate what a completely clueless idiot you are. We got that message the first time.
• You are nothing but a mindless troll in service to your silly troll god.
• Your ignorance of evolution is so abject that you always run away in terror from ringo's simple question (this latest from his Message 2749:
  When YOU understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B →C, you can try to talk to the gownups.

   I do indeed understand the multiplication rule, which is how I know that you have no clue how to use it!And you, you stupid willfully ignorant idiot, have such arrogance as to falsely claim competence that you clearly do not possess?What a fucking idiot!

dwise1:

---

Message received and understood:

---

Yeah right, if you had gotten the message, you would know how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. And if you knew how the multiplication rule works, you would know why 3 drug therapy works for the treatment of HIV and combination selection pressures work for controlling weeds and insects, but you don't. Your C-- programming has failed.

Your smilies and video don't help you understand how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. Try again.

I may be a fake Sharon Stone but that has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a real cowboy. Try to learn some logic. And YOU don't even understand what "descent" means. The mathematics is clear. And your attempt at joking about it doesn't work.

Kleinman:

---

And you know this because your mathematics is DU → MB.

ringo:

---

The mathematics is clear. And your attempt at joking about it doesn't work.

---

---

Who is joking? Your math is as dumb as your non-existent google search links that explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. Is this what your spurs look like?

Well, your DU → MB is not mathematics. You haven't even defined your terms. If you have figured out how to google spurs, you should be able to google how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. You'll see the explanations that SCIENCE has.

Kleinman:

---

Who is joking?

ringo:

---

Well, your DU → MB is not mathematics. You haven't even defined your terms.

---

---

I'm using your definitions and they are DU → MB.

Kleinman:

---

Is this what your spurs look like?

ringo:

---

If you have figured out how to google spurs, you should be able to google how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. You'll see the explanations that SCIENCE has.

---

---

You are a Sharon Stone wannabe, and that's your fantasy. And if you think you are a relative of fecal bacteria, don't let me stop you with the mathematical and experimental facts. And using your definition, it is DU → MB.

No you are not. I have never defined D, U or M. I have defined B as a descendent of ancestor A but nothing in your DU → MB says anything about that. You know nothing about my fantasies. WE (including YOU) are ALL related to ALL living things. The observation of gross anatomy concluded that centuries ago and the conclusion has been confirmed by DNA. You won't stop the facts from coming. Again, not my definitions. You're just blowing a smokescreen to try to hide your foolishness.

Kleinman:

---

I'm using your definitions...

ringo:

---

No you are not. I have never defined D, U or M. I have defined B as a descendent of ancestor A but nothing in your DU → MB says anything about that.

---

---

If you understand your own definition you could explain how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. Well, you would need to understand some introductory probability theory. I understand you are too busy with your Sharon Stone fetish.