|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Junior Member (Idle past 528 days) Posts: 5 From: Austin Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is ID falsifiable by any kind of experiment? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
That makes no sense. No religion defines itself that way.
Evolution is religion since it has no answer for two opposing extremes opposites in Biology. MrIntelligentDesign writes:
No. The FIRST breakthrough is the definition of intelligence, that all definitions, as written in all dictionaries, in all formats, in all languages, must be changed and replaced. Nobody is going to re-define intelligence on your say-so. My own simple definition of intelligence is the ability to learn. YOU do not have the ability to learn. If you did, you would have learned that evolution is the way it works. Your puny attempts to discredit evolution do not work.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
As I said, you have no clue. One of the reasons why Evolution is wrong is for the carelessness and lack of precision of Evolution and its supporters. Evolution is the most robust theory that science has ever devised. Evolution is many times more complete, precise and accurate than gravity, for example.
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
I haven't invented anything. I have boiled down the definition of intelligence as far as I can - but apparently it's still too much for you yo understand.
You cannot simply invent definition of intelligence at will. MrIntelligentDesign writes:
Nonsense.
You must support your definition with test and experiment... MrIntelligentDesign writes:
It is.
... and your definition must be universal that applicable in all topics. MrIntelligentDesign writes:
Your problem is that you've started from a totally false premise. Learn what evolution is before you try to make conclusions about whether it's "right" or "wrong". Your sources have been lying to you. You just look like a fool repeating those lies here.
Thus, Evolution and you are all totally wrong in science. MrIntelligentDesign writes:
I'm doing fine. Notice that none of the smart people are disagreeing with me. You must do better than that. YOU are the one who must do better if you hope to destroy the whole edifice of science. And make no mistake, you are trying to attack ALL of science, not just evolution. Your sources have lied to you, telling you that evolution is the only "bad" part of science. Evolution is an integral part of science. NOBODY can separate evolution from science, least of all a know-nothing like you.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
And any goober can throw out somebody else's definitions, just like any goober can tear down a building.
As I had told here many times that anybody and everybody can invent definitions... MrIntelligentDesign writes:
Go ahead and show that they are not. Anybody can tear down a building but can you build a replacement?
...but are those invented definitions correct and part of reality? MrIntelligentDesign writes:
So go ahead and undistort. All you've done so far is whine. Do something constructive. Words always convey meaning, but if distorted, will also convey distorted meaning.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
You have been asked many times, how do YOU tell the difference between guided and unguided. What is the answer? How could they explain reality in biological world without knowing unguided to guided X?Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
I gave you a simple definition: Intelligence is the ability to learn. Go ahead and tell us what is wrong with that definition. I think that you should go to mental hospital for you cannot define and explain the topic of intelligence.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
YOU have already drawn the conclusion that "it was designed". How did YOU draw that conclusion? How do YOU tell designed from not designed so YOU can draw a conclusion. But you are asking me to answer my own question, because you cannot asnwer it? MrIntelligentDesign writes:
It doesn't matter whether i can answer it or not. YOU are trying to push YOUR conclusion, so YOU have to be able to explain HOW you drew your conclusion. Can you answer it or not? But you can't. So your conclusion is invalid.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
How is that a "real question" in biology? ringo writes:
It is wrong since it cannot answer a real scientific question in biology, like: I gave you a simple definition: Intelligence is the ability to learn. Go ahead and tell us what is wrong with that definition. Is biological cell intelligently designed or not? I googled "Is life intelligently designed?"
Wikipedia calls intelligent design "a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God".
There don't seem to be many actual scientists who think it is a "real question in biology".The ACLU calls inelligent design "a pseudoscientific set of beliefs". The Center for American Progress calls intelligent design "a less comprehensive alternative to evolutionary theory". So try again. What's wrong with my definition?
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
On the contrary, my definition does not disagree in any way with science, reality, the US Constitution, The Lord of the Rings, etc.
WHICH means, that the definition above that you had given is not scientific, not even realistic, but just freely invented by someone who was ignorant of reality and ignorant of science, without any basis from reality. MrIntelligentDesign writes:
As long as your "designer" can't be put on a lab bench and analyzed, your idea of "intelligent design" is a fantasy. FREEDOM is good, but we are not free to make our own reality, since that is fantasy. Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
Do you pity the winners of the SuperBowl? I really pity those supporters of Evolution...Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
MrIntelligentDesign writes:
We can't falsify elephants either. The reason why you cannot falsify and rebut Evolution Theory because you are supporting a fantasy. Do ya know why? Because they are reality.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
I don't think he even has an actual straw man. He just has a belief that there IS an evolution strawman. He can't even articulate what it is, let alone knock it down. He has been told by creationist liars that there IS an evolution strawman that THEY can knock down but he knows nothing beyond that. So in essence what you appear to be suggesting is that the reason that Mr.I D can attack evolutionary theory is because he essentially made his own straw man to knock down.Come all of you cowboys all over this land, I'll teach you the law of the Ranger's Command: To hold a six shooter, and never to run As long as there's bullets in both of your guns. -- Woody Guthrie
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024