Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals

But you DO believe that Jesus existed before He was born.

Well, you have more potato in you than most of us.

There is no need to "prove" that Jesus never existed, no more than there is a need to prove that leprechauns don't exist. Where there is no evidence, the default is that it didn't happen.But you don't care about the truth of whether ot not Jesus existed. Your thinking is exactly like the creationists: cling to your superstitions despite all the evidence.

Even your creationism is behind the times. The so-called "Cambrian explosion" has been explained six ways from Sunday.

Explain what is funny and/or dumb about what I said.

Of course it is. How are they different?

As usual, you understand nothing. And you lie about things you can not possibly know.

You're a fool. Why don't you trust what Darwinists say? Cow and pig insulin. Where did you get that idea anyway? From somebody else with an IQ of 9? You certainly didn't get it from anybody with any knowledge of medical science. You're a self-confessed idiot and you've wasted a lot of time on it in this thread. And YOU don't understand what a theory is. Saying "only a theory" is like saying "only a trillion dollars". The word "only" doesn't really apply to something so vast. Hmm... I'm pretty sure I mentioned one: cow and pig insulin.

I can't believe that you don't understand: "relatedness of all species" is exactly the same as common descent. If you concede that all species are related, then you HAVE to accept common descent. You DO, in fact, accept common descent. Cow and pig insulin. And you've been wrong every time. And we have no choice but to conclude that your self-admitted IQ of 9 in no way qualifies you to reach that conclusion. 1. "Merely a theory" - i.e. merely the most complete explanation we have - is a nonsensical statement.
2. Science doesn't attempt to "prove" anything.
3. You're demonstrating that you have no ability to learn anything.

I've asked him that question several times. He won't/can't answer it. He doesn't even dare to think about it.

Nonsense. Negative results are still useful. For example, we tried prayer and got nothing but negative results, so we learned not to waste any more time on it.

That's what I said.I gave an example in the message you quoted: We tried prayer and got nothing but negative results, so we learned not to waste any more time on it. Certainly. Knowing that a teaspoon is not useful in golf is useful knowledge.By trying a teaspoon in golf, we learned not to waste any more time on it. If we all had your disdain for negative results, every golfer would be carrying a bag ful of teasppons.

A visitor to Saskatchewan once marveled that there are farm-chemical ads on TV in prime time. The reason Canadians are so friendly is because we feel obligated to tell everybody we meet how cold it is.

One - i.e. you - would be wrong. Dredge is a non-thinker. He even admits to being an idiot. Another wrong assumption. Intelligence can be defined in simplest terms as the ability to learn. Creationists do not have that. Dredge said in Message 111, "my IQ is less than 10".

You contradict yourself. You once called me "retarded" but I'm pretty quick on the draw.(As Abraham Lincoln supposedly said, nobody has a good enough memory to be a good liar.)