Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals

You can't just make claims you need evidence to support those claims.

The Cambrian Explosion alone makes a mockery of the superstition of UCD. But Darwinoid scientists dismiss that inconvenient truth bcoz it doesn't fit their preferred myth.When dishonesty enters science you know it ain't science anymore, but lying propaganda invented by con-men.

Dredgings: No it doesn't. Get your head on straight.The rate of speciation from whichever set of organisms are present at a particular time from the UCD can vary all over the place and has.

You Darwinoids just make crap up as you go along. Such con-men.

All we can know is what you tell us. And you keep saying things like, ".. an atheist claiming to know that God had no reason to create a nested hierarchy..."You seem to believe in God, and you admit to being Catholic, and you take stupid creationist positions, so it's reasonable assumption that you're a stupid creationist who believes the Genesis account.

And you didn't answer mine: Why don't science deniers like creationists and flat-earthers produce any scientific breakthroughs? Not hardly. But he didn't deny evolution - or any other science. He said that he had accomplished what he did because he stood on the shoulders of giant - and if Darwin had been alive at the time, Newton would most likely have recognized him as one of those giants.You, unlike Newton, denigrate science and scientists every chance you get.

But you DO believe that Jesus existed before He was born.

Well, you have more potato in you than most of us.

There is no need to "prove" that Jesus never existed, no more than there is a need to prove that leprechauns don't exist. Where there is no evidence, the default is that it didn't happen.But you don't care about the truth of whether ot not Jesus existed. Your thinking is exactly like the creationists: cling to your superstitions despite all the evidence.

Even your creationism is behind the times. The so-called "Cambrian explosion" has been explained six ways from Sunday.

Anyone who reads this thread will see that all you have is mockery, and a complete inability to address the evidence that has been presented.

Anyone who thinks they know how "early life" evolved Message 1133 is delusional ... or worse.Darwinoid scientists are amongst the most egregious bs-artists and con-men on the planet.

So you can't address the evidence we are presenting?

You say the "answers are there", yet you can't provide even one example of how the theory of UCD has made a practical contribution to medical or biological science. That's APauling.All you have to offer is a bare assertion. Therefore I've no other choice but to conclude that you're just one more mendacious Darwinist con-man. Sorry. I've yet to find UCD informing medical science and operational biology of anything useful. I don't think UCD informs anyone of anything... it just a bedtime story invented by atheists.

What a rant. Forget to take your medication again?