Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Tanypteryx:

---

---

Tany gives his physical and mathematical explanation of biological evolution. Any other novices, laymen, or biologists want to give it a shot.

Now you're trolling.

AZPaul3:

---

Now you're trolling.

---

And here's AZPaul3's attempt at giving his physical and mathematical explanation of biological evolution. Any other novices, laymen, or biologists want to give it a shot.

I do understand that every time i buy a lottery ticket, my chances of winning are the same.

Dredge:

---

I do understand that every time i buy a lottery ticket, my chances of winning are the same.

---

ringo wants me to teach you introductory probability theory when it is ringo that needs to learn that subject. He's the one that believes that reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals. That's what happens when biologists think they understand mathematics by taking a survey of mathematics course and barely passing that course.

My corollary to this is. And I will trip you.

Poor ringo seems to think that the probability of winning the lottery once is equal to the probability of the same person winning the lottery 1000 times in a row. Little wonder he thinks the scientific impossibility of abiogenesis by natural means is statistically inevitable.Atheists fantasies are kinda embarrassing. More embarrassing atheist fantasies. Why should evolutionary scientists bother with mathematics when they can invent fairy tales about what happened millions of years ago and pass them off as facts?The atheistic cult of Darwinism thrives on dreaming up bedtime stories about the ancient past.

What is embarrassing is you trying to swim in the wake of your mathematically muddled mentor. But you are a believer in fantasies (weak mind) so adopting his bullshit is easy for you. You mean like your bible that was pulled from the asses of priests and charlatans 3500 years ago? No, science is not like that at all. Scientists have reality to work from.You and your mathematically muddled mentor are quite the pair. Birds of a feather mind flocking in fantasy time.

Kleinman:

---

ringo wants me to teach you introductory probability theory when it is ringo that needs to learn that subject.

Dredge:

---

Poor ringo seems to think that the probability of winning the lottery once is equal to the probability of the same person winning the lottery 1000 times in a row. Little wonder he thinks the scientific impossibility of abiogenesis by natural means is statistically inevitable.

---

---

ringo thinks he is being clever. There is a thing called the gambler's fallacy. Suppose the probability of winning any of the 1000 lotteries is 1 in a million. In that case, the probability of winning the first lottery will be the same as winning any of the other 999 lotteries, ie., 1 in a million. It is the joint probability, the probability of winning more than 1 lottery, that changes. These novices and laymen do the same to you with your claim of negative probabilities. I understand what you are saying, the probability of abiogenesis is so low, it might as well be a negative probability which is impossible. These nitpickers can't come up with a mathematically coherent explanation for abiogenesis or universal common descent, so this is how they try to argue whatever point they have in their imagination.

Dredge:

---

Atheists fantasies are kinda embarrassing.

---

It's worse than that, it is harmful. They fail to correctly explain how antimicrobial drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail.

Kleinman:

---

He's the one that believes that reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals.

Dredge:

---

More embarrassing atheist fantasies.

---

---

There are confusing science with science fiction.

Kleinman:

---

That's what happens when biologists think they understand mathematics by taking a survey of mathematics course and barely passing that course.

Dredge:

---

Why should evolutionary scientists bother with mathematics when they can invent fairy tales about what happened millions of years ago and pass them off as facts?

---

---

It's not just mathematics, experimental evidence of biological evolution contradicts their belief system. There was a time when they thought that the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance was proof of universal common descent. Now they don't want to talk about the subject.

Dredge:

---

The atheistic cult of Darwinism thrives on dreaming up bedtime stories about the ancient past.

---

Darwin did get two important things right. He understood that two important aspects of biological evolution are biological competition and descent with modification. The error is in grossly over-extrapolating these two physical processes into universal common descent. It requires being able to do the math to know this is an error. Biologists don't know how to do this math correctly (except for Taq who now knows, but he has left the building).

Dredge:

---

Atheists fantasies are kinda embarrassing.

AZPaul3:

---

What is embarrassing is you trying to swim in the wake of your mathematically muddled mentor. But you are a believer in fantasies (weak mind) so adopting his bullshit is easy for you.

---

---

So, when is AZPaul3 going to explain to us the Kishony, Lenski, and Desai biological evolutionary experiments? Let's see if you can clarify this subjet for us.

Dredge:

---

Why should evolutionary scientists bother with mathematics when they can invent fairy tales about what happened millions of years ago and pass them off as facts?

AZPaul3:

---

You mean like your bible that was pulled from the asses of priests and charlatans 3500 years ago? No, science is not like that at all. Scientists have reality to work from.
​
You and your mathematically muddled mentor are quite the pair. Birds of a feather mind flocking in fantasy time.

---

---

Says AZPaul3 who is so good at seeing the evil in others but can't see his own evil. Do you know that the Bible says we are all evil and we all deserve hell?

Well, I have stated many times on this forum that I have a fragile, eggshell mind. Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit has convinced me the truth of the Catholic Church ... the truth you have yet to discover.

What holy spirit? Where is this thing? What's it made of?This is one of those meat-cracker delusions of your religious mind, isn't it.

AZPaul3:

---

What holy spirit? Where is this thing? What's it made of?
​
This is one of those meat-cracker delusions of the religious mind, isn't it.

---

Didn't they teach you about being born again in your catechism? But somehow, you find believing that reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals is real.

Says the man that believes in magic.

Theodoric:

---

Says the man that believes in magic.

---

People do magic, just watch a few Penn and Teller "Fool Us" shows. I don't deal in magic, I deal in hard mathematical science such as giving the correct mathematical explanation of descent with modification which is verified by the experimental evidence of the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments. This mathematical explanation of descent with modification is also verified by every other empirical example of biological evolution. Let's see if you can dismiss it with an empirical example that behaves differently.