Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Brexit - Should they stay or should they go?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 700 of 887 (859340)
07-31-2019 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 690 by Diomedes
07-29-2019 10:26 AM


Re: So now what?
I may be asking a silly question, but why wouldn't Northern Ireland and Scotland form their own UK (capital in either Belfast or Edinburgh). Northern Ireland has to go this way because of the risks associated with a hard border with Ireland just for their own peace and tranquility. Scotland's been unhappy with the UK and nearly voted to withdraw a few years ago, and I'm guessing that when Scotland says they're unhappy with the UK that they really mean England and Wales, not Northern Ireland.
They'd need to work out trade/immigration/military deals with Wales and England, but wouldn't that be preferable to walking down the no-deal Brexit path? And they'd have open borders with the rest of the EU, and it would just be England and Wales walled off in their nice comfortable little realm of passport carrying citizens.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 690 by Diomedes, posted 07-29-2019 10:26 AM Diomedes has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 701 by Heathen, posted 07-31-2019 9:11 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 702 of 887 (859475)
07-31-2019 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 701 by Heathen
07-31-2019 9:11 AM


Re: So now what?
Well, here's another silly idea, then. Scotland and Northern Ireland both leave the UK. Scotland's leaving makes sense because they almost achieved it a few years ago, and now it makes even more sense. Am I right to assume that as an independent nation newly outside the UK that they'll have to apply for EU membership? If so they might want to time their exit from the UK to coincide with their admittance to the EU.
Northern Ireland's leaving will be a close thing, but at least some Unionists will see the danger of a hard border with Ireland as greater than parting with the UK, and Sinn Fein and the Social Democrat and Labour Party will tend toward parting, also. Again depending upon the details of entry to the EU, Northern Ireland may want to delay exit from the UK until they're admitted to the EU. Northern Ireland will do a long dance with Ireland that possibly results in eventual reunification, though if reunifying with Ireland automatically makes them an EU member then that could accelerate the process.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 701 by Heathen, posted 07-31-2019 9:11 AM Heathen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 703 by Heathen, posted 08-01-2019 11:04 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 715 by caffeine, posted 08-06-2019 8:32 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 720 of 887 (861854)
08-28-2019 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 719 by Diomedes
08-28-2019 9:09 AM


Re: Johnson asks Queen to suspend Parliament
I'm probably walking out on a pretty thin branch commenting on British politics, but aren't requests like this to the monarch just a formality, always rubber stamped?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 719 by Diomedes, posted 08-28-2019 9:09 AM Diomedes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 721 by Diomedes, posted 08-28-2019 10:24 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 740 of 887 (862325)
09-04-2019 10:05 AM
Reply to: Message 737 by caffeine
09-04-2019 8:50 AM


I'm not sure what all the language means, some of the terminology is unfamiliar, but what we're reading over here is that parliament will vote Wednesday on whether to block the government (apparently a separate entity from parliament under the direction of Boris Johnson) from leaving the EU with no deal on 10/31.
And if I'm getting the correct sense of things, if that vote succeeds then Boris Johnson will try to schedule a general election that he hopes would give him the mandate he needs but that might also put him out of power. Apparently the opposition fears that a general election could give Johnson that mandate and so will oppose a general election, which requires the approval of 2/3 of parliament. This would leave a weakened and more vulnerable minority Johnson government in charge. Apparently that's preferable to the risk that a general election that might strengthen Johnson's hand.
Complicating matters is that Johnson is apparently engaging in a blatant level of lying of which Trump would be proud, insisting that there was progress in the EU talks (as a Trump acolyte maybe Johnson should next claim he's receiving calls from EU officials wishing to make a deal). It is true that the EU is making plans that would mitigate the pain of a no-deal Brexit, which they consider a danger prudent to plan for, but this has nothing to do with UK/EU talks.
My attempts at interpreting British government have a tendency to be off the mark, corrections welcome.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 737 by caffeine, posted 09-04-2019 8:50 AM caffeine has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 743 by DrJones*, posted 09-04-2019 5:29 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 747 by caffeine, posted 09-05-2019 3:55 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 749 of 887 (862438)
09-05-2019 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 748 by Diomedes
09-05-2019 8:52 AM


Re: Why would the EU grant an extension?
I've probably said this before, but why can't Britain reverse Brexit? Why is the result of this populist resolution considered cast in stone? Every few years, as in all countries, Britain reverses itself and puts the opposite party in charge. Why can't Britain reverse itself on Brexit?
I hear that the political temperature on Brexit is a close thing, that there is no guarantee that voting on it again wouldn't again be a close affair, but that makes no sense. The British people couldn't possibly be so dense. Brexit passed because its negative aspects were not understood at the time. Now they are. How could Brexit ever pass again?
I'm sure i've again revealed my woeful ignorance of British politics, but that's the way I feel.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 748 by Diomedes, posted 09-05-2019 8:52 AM Diomedes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 750 by Diomedes, posted 09-05-2019 9:31 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 751 by Tangle, posted 09-05-2019 9:39 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 752 of 887 (862458)
09-05-2019 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 751 by Tangle
09-05-2019 9:39 AM


Re: Why would the EU grant an extension?
Tangle writes:
Why is the result of this populist resolution considered cast in stone?
It isn't, but it would need another vote.
Oh, sure, I understand that.
Every few years, as in all countries, Britain reverses itself and puts the opposite party in charge. Why can't Britain reverse itself on Brexit?
Why doesn't the USA change the 2nd amendment?
I didn't mean to ask why doesn't Britain reverse itself on Brexit, but why *can't* it. The reason for that phrasing is because the way I often hear it described over here is that there can't be another vote on Brexit because it would be undemocratic. The British people have already democratically expressed their will, and to ask them the same question again just because implementation poses difficult issues is undemocratic.
The flip side of it, of course, is that Britain was sold a bill of goods on Brexit. It has few of the benefits promised, and it includes many costs that were left unmentioned.
I'm sure i've again revealed my woeful ignorance of British politics, but that's the way I feel.
No, you've just revealed your ignorance of the majority of people. Just like our politicians did. Well one of them, Cameron.
But I think there's a basic economic psychology issue being ignored. People in general respond more viscerally to fears than to benefits. When on an objective level the costs and benefits balance out, people will always respond more strongly to the costs. In other words, fear mongering works.
Brexit has to be fought with equivalent fear mongering. For example, one doesn't argue that Britain's position in the EU makes it the financial center, and so Britain should stay. One instead argues that a good portion of Britain's financial power would move to the continent, and so Britain shouldn't leave.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 751 by Tangle, posted 09-05-2019 9:39 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 753 by Tangle, posted 09-05-2019 1:03 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 754 by DrJones*, posted 09-05-2019 1:37 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 757 of 887 (862587)
09-07-2019 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 754 by DrJones*
09-05-2019 1:37 PM


Re: Why would the EU grant an extension?
DrJones* writes:
They can reverse Brexit. The referendum was non-binding, the government has no legal obligation to go through with it. The EU court has said that the UK can stop the process anytime they want without needing the agreement of the other members. It is legally possible to for them to just say "oops changed our minds, we're staying". It's politics that are keeping this clusterfuck going.
This is new information for me. I didn't know the referendum was non-binding. The downside risks and difficulties of Brexit are now so obvious and apparent that it seems a no-brainer to bring it to a halt. It is too bad that the politics makes this impossible.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 754 by DrJones*, posted 09-05-2019 1:37 PM DrJones* has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 758 by Chiroptera, posted 09-07-2019 10:00 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 770 by Tusko, posted 09-11-2019 9:45 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 857 of 887 (897110)
08-29-2022 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 824 by Tangle
12-18-2019 3:52 AM


Re: The Final Results
From two and a half years ago:
Tangle writes:
Boris is a clown but he's no idiot - he's a very clever guy. He's no Trump, I have a feeling he'll surprise us.

Well we have to hope.
I accidentally clicked on a link that brought this post into view. What are the odds of randomly coming across something so relevant?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 824 by Tangle, posted 12-18-2019 3:52 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 858 by Tangle, posted 08-29-2022 3:59 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 859 of 887 (897147)
08-29-2022 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 858 by Tangle
08-29-2022 3:59 PM


Re: The Final Results
Tangle writes:
If the clown hadn't turned out to also be a pathological liar maybe things would have worked out better...
Wasn't he also corrupt, a hypocrite, and a crook? I don't know the perspective from over there, but I think that's the way it looks from over here. And maybe it could be argued that it's kind of expected that one lie about one's corruption, hypocrisy and thievery.
Anyway, I was very surprised to find myself staring at that old post about Johnson that while hopeful still seemed to have him pegged.
Didn't he do some amazing work early on in getting Brexit though? That aside, one thing you can say about old Boris is that he sure knew how to have a good time!
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 858 by Tangle, posted 08-29-2022 3:59 PM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 860 by dwise1, posted 08-29-2022 7:43 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22394
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


(1)
Message 873 of 887 (897728)
09-10-2022 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 872 by Tanypteryx
09-10-2022 11:11 AM


Re: Follow the £ £ £
Tanyperyx writes:
American flags at half mast is a bit too much for me.
I can understand feeling this way, and many British probably feel the same way, but the figurative head of our closest ally in the entire world has died, so I'm okay with it.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 872 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-10-2022 11:11 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024