Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Power of the New Intelligent Design...
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 387 of 1197 (893722)
04-18-2022 11:40 PM
Reply to: Message 379 by WookieeB
04-18-2022 4:24 PM


I had already explained to them from my OP, the definitions of both intelligence and non-intelligence..
a single, universal, and correct definition...
but they are denying real science.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me share you part of my science article to be submitted for peer-review this week. Actually, I had been discussing this in my OP.
1. From Educational System
Since I discovered intelligence and non-intelligence, I will derive these two topics in a different way for this science article. From educational system, direct from our classroom – let us derive intelligence.
Thought Experiment 1: Let us assume that there is a teacher or professor who has 50 students in a given class. The teacher/professor would like to give test/examination to the class with questionnaire, having 100 questions. The teacher/professor will surely explain to the students that the passing score is, say, 70 scores, and the perfect score is 100 scores.
As you can see, that the teacher/professor is asking the students to make two solutions, one for passing score and one is for perfect score, in one given exam (problem). From this, we can derive intelligence.
Intelligence = having two solutions (passing and perfect) in one exam or
Intelligence = problem-solution-solution
Non-intelligence = having one solution (passing score only) or
Non-intelligence = problem-solution
Non-intelligence = having failed both passing score and perfect score or
Non-intelligence = problem-solution (failure is also considered a solution, but negative solution)
Or,
if the Problem is 75, and if the Solution is <75, failure, then, non-intelligence
if the Problem is 75, and if the Solution is = 75, then, non-intelligence
if the Problem is 75, and if the Solution is > 76 - 100, then, intelligence.
What should we call to those students who had made two solutions in one problem? Smart or not smart? Intelligent or not intelligent? How about those who failed?
As you can see from derivation that intelligence is an asymmetry (one problem with two or more solutions) – a pattern, an intellen - which means, intelligence is always one problem with two or more solutions. Non-intelligence is always symmetry – a pattern too, a naturen - or one problem, one solution, or failure. Universal and natural.
Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.

Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.

Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 379 by WookieeB, posted 04-18-2022 4:24 PM WookieeB has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by WookieeB, posted 04-19-2022 2:32 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 393 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-19-2022 11:37 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 388 of 1197 (893723)
04-18-2022 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 382 by AZPaul3
04-18-2022 6:19 PM


You will understand me clearly if you will really understand intelligence...
Once you knew intelligence, you will surely agree with me...
This is the original OP in where I derived intelligence, with another experiment.
The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations | Zenodo
It is long since I detailed and documented them well,
Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by AZPaul3, posted 04-18-2022 6:19 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 471 of 1197 (896742)
08-18-2022 3:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by MrIntelligentDesign
01-19-2022 9:31 PM


GOD of THE GAPS or dirtdidit?
is the new ID a some form of GOD of THE GAPS or dirtdidit, real intelligence-did-t?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by MrIntelligentDesign, posted 01-19-2022 9:31 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by PaulK, posted 08-18-2022 4:01 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 473 of 1197 (896744)
08-18-2022 4:58 AM
Reply to: Message 472 by PaulK
08-18-2022 4:01 AM


Re: GOD of THE GAPS or dirtdidit?
WHAT? What is your basis?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 472 by PaulK, posted 08-18-2022 4:01 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 474 by PaulK, posted 08-18-2022 5:29 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 475 of 1197 (899190)
10-09-2022 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 474 by PaulK
08-18-2022 5:29 AM


Re: GOD of THE GAPS or dirtdidit?
Oh my, you need a doctor!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 474 by PaulK, posted 08-18-2022 5:29 AM PaulK has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 495 of 1197 (901438)
11-10-2022 2:52 AM
Reply to: Message 486 by ringo
11-08-2022 11:02 AM


Wow, this thread had discussed many things. Supposed to be, this is only for the Intelligent Design and its Arguments.
Well, why God (as one of many ID candidates) designed snakes and worms, etc?
Just to kill.
If there is no sin or error of existence (error in intelligence), there will be no poisonous snakes or no killings...
Intelligence gives life, violations of intelligence kill. Thus it predicts that there was a time in the history of humanity or earth that humans had violated intelligence and become stupid.
Now, enjoy the First Argument of the Intelligent Design.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAzPyb3ppcw&t=40s

This message is a reply to:
 Message 486 by ringo, posted 11-08-2022 11:02 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 497 by ringo, posted 11-10-2022 10:52 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 496 of 1197 (901439)
11-10-2022 3:00 AM
Reply to: Message 491 by Dredge
11-09-2022 2:12 PM


Hi Dredge and to those who are against Evolution.
Evolution is wrong and stupid. We need to change the explanation with a new Theory in Biology for origin and change of frequency alleles.
Darwin was stupid.
The Intelligent Design had formulated Biological Interrelation, a better theory than evolution, since Interrelation uses intelligence and included the whole part/scope of reality.
It is like Flat Earth (Evolution) versus Round Earth (Interrelation)...
If you could correctly differentiate the two in science, then, you will understand how stupid Evolution is and how powerful and correct Interrelation is.
I can explain further, if you wish to share the new theory.
Let us debate those erroneous supporters of Evolution with new model...and see who has the best evidences.
Below is the First Detailed Argument of Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAzPyb3ppcw&t=40s

This message is a reply to:
 Message 491 by Dredge, posted 11-09-2022 2:12 PM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 498 by ringo, posted 11-10-2022 11:00 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 499 by Taq, posted 11-10-2022 2:55 PM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 512 by Dredge, posted 11-13-2022 6:17 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 500 of 1197 (901543)
11-10-2022 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 497 by ringo
11-10-2022 10:52 AM


Do you really know the ARGUMENTS of Intelligent Design, as shared in the video, especially the OP?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 497 by ringo, posted 11-10-2022 10:52 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 501 by Theodoric, posted 11-10-2022 8:40 PM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 507 by ringo, posted 11-13-2022 1:33 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 502 of 1197 (901546)
11-10-2022 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 498 by ringo
11-10-2022 11:00 AM


Evolution is wrong and proven wrong, but the journals did not want Evolution to be defeated, like religion.
You can Google my article in Zenodo and you will read some info.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 498 by ringo, posted 11-10-2022 11:00 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 506 by AZPaul3, posted 11-10-2022 10:33 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 510 by ringo, posted 11-13-2022 1:40 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 503 of 1197 (901547)
11-10-2022 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 501 by Theodoric
11-10-2022 8:40 PM


It is too long. Darwin and Evolution could never be explained in one sentence, without asking for details.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 501 by Theodoric, posted 11-10-2022 8:40 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 505 by Theodoric, posted 11-10-2022 10:11 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 508 by ringo, posted 11-13-2022 1:35 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 504 of 1197 (901548)
11-10-2022 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 499 by Taq
11-10-2022 2:55 PM


You really do not know how to start...
EVOLUTION IS...
On 1859 AD, a group of scientists had concluded that the shape of the earth is Flat. They called themselves Flat Earthers. They also wrote science book titled, “On the Origin of Flat Earth by Means of Area Selection”. They based their scientific explanation of Flat Earth from flat surfaces of Earth found in some major cities worldwide (not around the world) like Manila, Tokyo, Beijing, Canberra, Jakarta, Moscow, New Delhi, Riyadh, Johannesburg, Rabat, Abuja, Berlin, London, Ottawa, Washington DC, Brasilia, and Buenos Aires, etc. The basis or point of reference uses a 2 km x 2 km square flat surface, 4 km2 (4 km^2) area, on all picked cities. Since these picked flat surfaces could be found worldwide (not around the world), they concluded that the shape of the earth is really flat, and not round. They also had pictures of those flat surfaces and claimed that they could extend the area to 4 km x 4 km square flat surface, 16 km2 (16 km^2). To Flat Earthers, Round Earthers are wrong and to dis-agree with this conclusion is to become science-deniers.
To support their arguments, they invented scientific predictions for Flat Earth: (1) If Flat Earth is true, then, humans can build 50 story’s building inside the 4 km2 (4 km^2) area. (2) If Flat Earth is true, then, humans can run with their pet dogs. Flat Earthers too had invented scientific falsification criteria to disprove the theory of Flat Earth. (a) If we cannot fly a kite in Flat Earth, then, Flat Earth is not true. (b) If we cannot farm peanuts in a picked 4 km2 (4 km^2) area, then, Flat Earth is not true. Flat Earthers too claimed that there are bumped flat earth (symbolizes: slight modifications or progressions), or curve flat earth (symbolizes: beneficial changes, selective pressure and non-random) and dented flat earth (symbolizes: positive selection, strong selection, manual selection, artificial selection), to support their explanations of Flat Earth.
When they were presented with many pictures of whole round Earth from NASA, taken by a Hubble Space Telescope (HST) orbiting the Earth, (symbolizes the new Intelligent Design from me), those Flat Earthers ridiculed the whole pictures and dismissed them as hoaxes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 499 by Taq, posted 11-10-2022 2:55 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 509 by ringo, posted 11-13-2022 1:38 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 514 by Taq, posted 11-14-2022 1:41 PM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 515 of 1197 (902049)
11-17-2022 4:13 AM
Reply to: Message 514 by Taq
11-14-2022 1:41 PM


Below are the invented explanations in biology, that have no part in reality:

1. The nested hierarchy
2. The difference in sequence conservation between exons and introns.
3. The difference in rates for transition and transversions in human-chimp genome comparisons.
4. Transitional hominid fossils.
5. The pattern of orthologous ERV's in primates.
..for they assumed that Evolution is correct.
Evolution is wrong for Evolution cannot explain if the change is really natural or not...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 514 by Taq, posted 11-14-2022 1:41 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 516 by AZPaul3, posted 11-17-2022 7:41 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied
 Message 517 by Tangle, posted 11-17-2022 8:48 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 518 by Taq, posted 11-17-2022 10:35 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 519 by dwise1, posted 11-17-2022 2:50 PM MrIntelligentDesign has replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 520 of 1197 (902121)
11-17-2022 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 518 by Taq
11-17-2022 10:35 AM


You observed them since you had already concluded that the change is non intelligence...
Evolution had concluded first! No test, no confirmation!
Now, let me clarify:
Once again, I would like to reiterate that Evolution = change of freq alleles... The topic of Evolution is change. The scope of "change" must be studied, whether the change is limited/narrow or broad/wide. Because, every explanation in science must be correct and the falsification too must be correct AND all explanations must be real.
Now, if Evolution will limit its explanation from of life from the first living thing on this planet to the vast array of species we see today, then, Evolution must decide or conclude if the origin of life, that will affect the change of life in living organisms, are intelligently designed or not, since change will always be affected by which factor will be chosen by Evolution.
Darwin and supporters of Evolution had chosen and concluded, that the change of freq alleles never uses intelligence, and the major mechanism is natural selection, and not intelligence nor intelligence selection. Thus, Evolution must really sure to it that these topics are well explained and well tested. But Evolution is dead on these topics, but had quickly concluded natural selection. That is stupidity.
In addition, Evolution must sure to it that the origin of both universe and life have no effect with the change of frequency alleles that will result in the origin of new species. BUT Evolution, as claimed and concluded by its supporters, started its explanation when life had begun! Evolution had limited its scope! The same analogy of FLAT EARTH by using a limited area of flat surface of earth! That is wrong and stupidity!
Thus, the best analogy of EVOLUTION is FLAT EARTH, as I had shown above.
Thus, if you are supporters of Evolution, you either deluded, or fooled by supporters of Evolution or deliberately deny reality, and uphold Evolution as a religion.
Once again, real scientist must ask, what change the Evolution is talking about?
What could affect the change of freq alleles in living organisms?
Do life and its origin have no affect in the change of freq alleles?
Those are the starting questions for Evolution, before Evolution conclude. Can you answer them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 518 by Taq, posted 11-17-2022 10:35 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 524 by Taq, posted 11-18-2022 10:40 AM MrIntelligentDesign has replied
 Message 545 by Dredge, posted 01-07-2023 12:14 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 521 of 1197 (902122)
11-17-2022 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 519 by dwise1
11-17-2022 2:50 PM


ID can categorize two opposite extremes, like intelligence to non-intelligence. Evolution should be doing that before Evolution could conclude natural selection or intelligence has no part in biology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 519 by dwise1, posted 11-17-2022 2:50 PM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 525 by Taq, posted 11-18-2022 10:58 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
MrIntelligentDesign
Member (Idle past 308 days)
Posts: 248
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 522 of 1197 (902123)
11-17-2022 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 517 by Tangle
11-17-2022 8:48 AM


Forensic science is probably correct than Evolution since Forensic Science can categorize and separate which is a criminal or not criminal, or intentionally made X to non-intentional.
But Evolution has none of these.
ID has these, thus, ID is better than Evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 517 by Tangle, posted 11-17-2022 8:48 AM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 523 by AZPaul3, posted 11-17-2022 9:17 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024