|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
AZPaul3 writes:
I didn't know that.
Evolution alone does not prove your god false. All of reality in the universe combined rejects your god because there is nothing there. That is the evidence of your god's true nature. Your god is a delusion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
AZPaul3 writes:
A shameful display of gross mendacity on my part, by the sounds of it..
Just from the opening messages from you in this thread I find 5 absolute lies. I couldn’t go any more. There are so many lies in your posts I can’t stomach to swamp through them all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Tanypteryx writes:
I implied no such thing. You have a vivid imagination, I must say ... no wonder you're a Darwinist!
Anyway, when you paste his scientific achievements into a post about ID, you are implying that ID is supported by his work in paleontology and entomology, but that is not the case at all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
dwise1 writes:
Thank you.
but he's pure creationist in all other ways.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
dwise1 writes:
The whales' "vestigial pelvic bones" aren't even attached to the spine! Whales' vestigial pelvic bones are located well forward of the flukes, by a foot or more in porpoises and proportionally farther forward in larger cetaceans. Darwinists will believe anything ... it's embarrassing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
A pelvis that isn't connected to a spine ... hilarious!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
dwise1 writes:
Have you noticed that the whales' mythical "vestigial pelvis" is located nowhere near the spine? Only in the bullshit fantasy-world of Darwinism does a pelvis disconnected from a spine make "sense". LOL!! with the ancestral pelvis -- have you never ever noticed how in all tetrapods the hind legs attach to the pelvis? "although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:21-22)Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
AZPaul3 writes:
Oh do please explain why ... entertain me with another untestable Darwinist fairy tale. And you can't figure out why!! ‘It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favoured by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test.’Dr. Colin Patterson
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
ringo writes:
Darwinists don't like that word, do they? It makes a mockery of the bullshit they try and con people with.
Stop saying "prove".You have claimed repeatedly in this thread that "nobody can know x".
Liar.Edited by Dredge, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
ringo writes:
Stop talking like a dunce. An description or explanation isn't knowledge until it's been proven to be correct. It's the BEST description and explanation available. And that's the only kind of knowledge we have about anything.So ToE isn't knowledge because it can't be proven to be correct. (Oh no ... I've used that word again (twice!) .. the one that craps on your fairy-tale science.)Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
ringo writes:
More stupid lies. Many forms of science are relevant and are demonstrably proven correct ... such as the two examples you mentioned - curing diseases and landing on the moon. It's clear that you do think all science is irrelevant because you continue to talk about "proof" and you refuse to learn anything about science. ToE, on the other hand, is nothing more than a useless, irrelevant story that cannot be proven to be correct.No one ever cured or treated disease with the theory that humans evolved from fish. Edited by Dredge, . Edited by Dredge, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Madam, you are mistaken.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
A description or explanation isn't knowledge until it's been proven to be correct.
ringo writes:
I hope you're not thinking of giving up your day-job to become a rational thinker.
Nonsense. Learn something.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
No one ever cured or treated disease with the theory that humans evolved from fish.
ringo writes:
Yet more bullshit. None of the useful "evolutionary principles" described in that paper include the theory that humans evolved from fish.
Nonsense.
How evolutionary principles improve the understanding of human health and disease Useful biology and medicine depends on facts (eg, "evolutionary principles"), not useless and irrelevant atheist-bedtime-stories like humans evolving from fish.Edited by Dredge, .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 100 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
dwise1 writes:
No it isn't. ToE is a set of explanations for how evolution MIGHT work. No one knows - or will ever know - if ToE explains how life of earth evolved. That makes ToE a pointless, irrelevant, over-inflated bag of hot air. The Theory of Evolution is the set of explanations for how evolution works. Unsurprisingly, ToE is scientifically useless. The only reason ToE was dreamed up, and it's only "use", is to provide atheists with a comforting bed-time creation story. Atheists delude themselves that ToE is "knowledge". What a joke - only an irrational dreamer would claim that an unprovable theory is "knowledge".
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024