Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals

I didn't know that.

A shameful display of gross mendacity on my part, by the sounds of it..

I implied no such thing. You have a vivid imagination, I must say ... no wonder you're a Darwinist!

Thank you.

The whales' "vestigial pelvic bones" aren't even attached to the spine!Darwinists will believe anything ... it's embarrassing.

A pelvis that isn't connected to a spine ... hilarious!

Have you noticed that the whales' mythical "vestigial pelvis" is located nowhere near the spine? Only in the bullshit fantasy-world of Darwinism does a pelvis disconnected from a spine make "sense". LOL!!"although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:21-22)

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

Oh do please explain why ... entertain me with another untestable Darwinist fairy tale.‘It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favoured by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test.’
Dr. Colin Patterson

Darwinists don't like that word, do they? It makes a mockery of the bullshit they try and con people with. Liar.

Edited by Dredge, .

Stop talking like a dunce. An description or explanation isn't knowledge until it's been proven to be correct.
So ToE isn't knowledge because it can't be proven to be correct.(Oh no ... I've used that word again (twice!) .. the one that craps on your fairy-tale science.)

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

More stupid lies. Many forms of science are relevant and are demonstrably proven correct ... such as the two examples you mentioned - curing diseases and landing on the moon.ToE, on the other hand, is nothing more than a useless, irrelevant story that cannot be proven to be correct.
No one ever cured or treated disease with the theory that humans evolved from fish.

Edited by Dredge, .

Edited by Dredge, .

Madam, you are mistaken.

I hope you're not thinking of giving up your day-job to become a rational thinker.

Yet more bullshit. None of the useful "evolutionary principles" described in that paper include the theory that humans evolved from fish.Useful biology and medicine depends on facts (eg, "evolutionary principles"), not useless and irrelevant atheist-bedtime-stories like humans evolving from fish.

Edited by Dredge, .

No it isn't. ToE is a set of explanations for how evolution MIGHT work. No one knows - or will ever know - if ToE explains how life of earth evolved. That makes ToE a pointless, irrelevant, over-inflated bag of hot air.Unsurprisingly, ToE is scientifically useless. The only reason ToE was dreamed up, and it's only "use", is to provide atheists with a comforting bed-time creation story.Atheists delude themselves that ToE is "knowledge". What a joke - only an irrational dreamer would claim that an unprovable theory is "knowledge".​​​