Coffee House Musings on Creationist Topic Proposals

Yes, we do know. You don’t know because you reject the overwhelming evidence of reality for your silly little religious reasons. Yes, we do know. You don’t know because you reject the overwhelming evidence of reality for your silly little religious reasons. Yes, we do know. You don’t know because you reject the overwhelming evidence of reality for your silly little religious reasons. Oooo, git the admin. He tried to say bullshit.Couldn't even get that right.

Here is a definition of "argument" (first result from a Google search):"a reason or set of reasons given in support of an idea, action or theory."What you have set out is a list of three bald assertions - no reasons or sets of reasons. And as we all know, in the absence of evidence, a bald assertion is, in the vast majority of cases, a lie or a delusion.We have tons of evidence - a gnat's whisker would outweigh yours.

Stop lying. Respond to Message 120.

Is the fact that you're not responding to any of the answers people provide you really not apparent to you? Are you truly unaware that you're just repeating the same argument over and over again? Are the many times people have called this to your attention really failing to penetrate your consciousness?--Percy

You have no way of confirming that a whale's nostrils evolved from the nosrils of a land mammal and you have no way of confirming any process that might be responsible ... therefore you cannot claim to know how that (alleged) transition occurred.​

... yet there are millions of Darwinists out there who believe the theory of evolution is also a fact. The atheist variety are especially devoted to this theory/fact belief system. What "evolution" are you referring to? I hope you're not suggesting that I myself am "illiterate" ... I'm semi-illiterate.
As for being a "dimwit" ... yes, that's true; I am a dimwit (although I prefer the word, "halfwit").
As for being "anti-science" ... not me.​​

Actually that would be millions of creationists believe the theory of evolution is a fact. They are incorrect, just like you are incorrect. Oh really? Name one.

Of course we have. We're not stupid lazy catholics who don't know how to study this world. Not only have we confirmed the evolution, we have the original land animal the whales evolved from: pakicetus. Ignorant little boy. You have been told about the DNA and amino​ acid structures that make and change phenotypic traits like the relocation of nostrils to blowholes. We know you have major reading comprehension problems so maybe you should take a few and re-read upthread.The mechanism for biological change is there for you to study if you can put down your gun, your torch and your bible to actually learn the reality instead of hunting down gays, witches and altar boys.

What "new body plans" are you referring to? This would be funny if it weren't so sadly pathological ... completely and utterly off-topic, nevertheless you couldn't resist the urge to inject some hate-speech into the conversation.

Edited by Dredge, .

Your refusal to describe how evolution happened means you don't know how evolution happened. ????

You haven't look it up yet? Lazy ignorant catholic. You're a catholic. There is always hate speech involved in your conversations. You're whole creed, purpose and existence is built upon and dependant on a continuing flood of papal hate-speech and contempt for all humanity.My hate speech, my ass. You guys fill the world with your hate speech and hate actions every day.

Language is interesting, isn't it? In Australia, we don't say "asshole" ... we say "arsehole". If you know how evolution works, please describe how an amphibian's double-circulation heart (allegedly) evolved from the single-circulation heart of a fish. What was the first step?

Dr. Gunter Bechly is one of my heroes! .. and evolutionnews.org has long been my favourite science website. Thanx for the link ... I love to read Bechly's stuff.

Deary, deary me - that's not even close to what I said. I said it's delusional to equate the theory of evolution with knowledge (aka fact). Here you go again ... claiming to know things that no one can possibly know. First you claimed to know how evolution works ... now you claim to know that Catholicism is a fairy tale.
​ In that case, please describe the microevolutionary steps involved in the (alleged) evolution of an amphibian's double-circulation heart from the single-circulation heart of a fish.​​

You can't describe the step-by-step process of even one evolutionary transition evident in the fossil record ... which means you can't claim to know how evolution works. I sincerely thank you for your wonderful words of wisdom, which are ... so profound ... that I don't think I will ever understand them.