marc9000 writes:
If you were not responding to that part, you should not have quoted it, and said it was untrue.
If I had not quoted that portion anyone reading it wouldn't have known what "it" referred to, that it referred to supply and demand. Here's what you said: "I know you could never understand it, few posters here could, I'm surprised you only got 2 green dots." How would anyone know what "it" meant without the antecedent portion? They wouldn't, hence I had no choice but to include it.
My own words made clear the focus was supply and demaind:
Percy in Message 1041: writes:
Why do you insist on saying things that are patently untrue. Supply and demand is a simple concept understood by even young school children.
It must be close to 100% of your posts that you don't understand either the topic or the message you're responding to or both.
--Percy