An Ether-Based Creation Model

So the US Department of Transportation is responsible for this new sub-quantum etheric aether?I gotta call you on this one jar. I don't think that's right.

Ok. I haven't an answer for that. You obviously have your stuff together. I leave the field to the victor.

Max Tegmark will be upset with you.

^^^ What he said.

You don't realize you are sidelining an ongoing hilarity that seems to have gone egregiously misunderstood leading to an abundance of pleasant intellectual distractions.The ether must be tamed, and an ether net is the tool that may help do that. Get with the program SSgt.Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

That quantum history you gave is about 6 very thick textbooks short of how it all came together, but I grant your point even if you refuse to get it. You do not have any evidence of your aether either physical or theoretical.Have you ever opened a real quantum physics textbook like Modern Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-42241-3? You see all the math?If you understood the math you would know why QM is so powerful. You have nothing to compare.That is the level of detailed math YOU need to formulate, YOU need to present, before anyone is going to consider your aether.

So says your wishful thinking. Part of your fantasy.The only kind of evidence, logic, credible model in physics is the math. Without the math, Michael MD, you have nothing to offer. Your aether is being ignored.

Oh, Son Goku, I don't think he's referring to anything in this universe. He apparently comes from a different reality.

Yawn.I'm sorry. What were you saying?

That code was not from a civilization past present or future, was it. It was natural, wasn’t it. From the etheric energy? The vibrations of the elemental ether units found a way to communicate with you? Is there more in this message than you are revealing? What else does it say? What are you hiding?

From Message 451And he goes on like this for 4 more paragraphs. Amazing.Can anyone find out what this guy is on? I might like to try me some of that.

Tinyweenium. Ignoranfimal. Mentalphallium. Insanitite.

That is precisely why your model must be rejected. You have no evidence. The standard model has literally 100s of millions of data points to its efficacy from almost a hundred years of bubble chambers to the LHC. There is evidence for the standard model. We know it is incomplete but we have hard physical evidence the standard model is a legitimate physical phenomenon. You provide no such evidence of your Ether.Math is the language of science. If you don't speak it you have no voice in any debate. You have provided no model (real model as in mathematical structure) for science to even consider.​Science is the study of nature. Nature does not deal in fair. Such a concept does not exist in nature or science. The only things we care about are the legitimacy of the physical observations and the structure of the math used to describe the phenomenon. You have provided neither.If you want consideration of your Ether, you ARE REQUIRED to provide a consistent rigorous mathematical framework showing the operations of your model and you ARE REQUIRED to provide physical evidence of its efficacy.1. Physical evidence
2. Consistent rigorous mathematical frameworkUntil you punch BOTH tickets to the pleasure of the science community then you have nothing to present to us. Your model exists only in your mind and will not be considered until you provide both of the above.And, frankly, a complaint of not fair is a childish lamentation unworthy of any legitimate scientist. Your "model" is based on your wishful thinking and undetected entities your mind has conjured. That is religion.Unexceptable.