Ground Penetrating Radar Scans of Noah's Ark

Pretty dubious. This is a Ron Wyatt claim, even rejected by many creationists who examined the site. Given the record of false claims I’d wait for a neutral expert analysis - which you won’t get from the people promoting the claims.

So why do these claims about LiDAR scans convince you over the existing evidence that it is a natural geological formation?Note also that LiDAR is not the same at all as ground-penetrating radar,

And here is Andrew Snelling’s response.I don’t see how the new reports are any better, and Snelling raises other points that need to be addressed.Again, even creationists have rejected the site. And for good reason. The scans don’t appear very convincing to me and - given the history of similar claims - I don’t see how I can trust the interpretation of the scans. Especially not with the evidence pointing to a geological origin.Edited by PaulK, : Restored url