Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the “Fine-Tuned Universe” an Illusion?
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 1 of 61 (891697)
02-09-2022 4:40 PM


I think this is probably best as a Coffee House topic because the article I reference seems more lunatic fringe than scientific. I saw it on SciTechDaily this morning and rather than the usual article about a study that is published in some scientific journal, it is more like publicity for their own report.
quote:
FQXi’s Fine Tuning report is part of the latest in a series exploring the frontiers of physics research, produced in partnership with the John Templeton Foundation. Other reports in the series tackle how our universe came into existence, whether time is real, and the origin of space from quantum entanglement.
Is the “Fine-Tuned Universe” an Illusion? Challenging Popular Arguments for a Multiverse by The Foundational Questions Institute, FQXi, February 8, 2022.
quote:
For decades physicists have been perplexed about why our cosmos appears to have been precisely tuned to foster intelligent life. It is widely thought that if the values of certain physical parameters, such as the masses of elementary particles, were tweaked, even slightly, it would have prevented the formation of the components necessary for life in the universe — including planets, stars, and galaxies. But recent studies, detailed in a new report by the Foundational Questions Institute, FQXi, propose that intelligent life could have evolved under drastically different physical conditions. The claim undermines a major argument in support of the existence of a multiverse of parallel universes.
So not just fine tuned for life, but fine tuned for intelligent life!
By the way, the new report link takes you to a brief 2 page "report" on the Templeton website which has no detailed recent studies.
quote:
“The tuning required for some of these physical parameters to give rise to life turns out to be less precise than the tuning needed to capture a station on your radio, according to new calculations,” says Miriam Frankel, who authored the FQXi report, which was produced with support from the John Templeton Foundation. “If true, the apparent fine tuning may be an illusion,” Frankel adds.
quote:
Over the last few decades, the subject of fine tuning has attracted some of the sharpest minds in physics. By probing the universe’s physical laws and precisely pinning down the values of physical constants—such as the masses of elementary particles and the strengths of forces—physicists have discovered that surprisingly small variations in these values would have rendered the universe lifeless. This led to a puzzle: why are physical conditions seemingly tailored towards human existence?
Almost the entire Universe is extreme vacuum filled with lethal extreme electromagnetic radiation. That does not seem like physical conditions tailored towards human existence.
I would bet that all the minds in physics, not just the sharpest, are aware of the fine tuning question.
I would also bet that the sharpest minds in physics do not spend any time or effort trying to figure out how to test this latest Creationist Pretend to be Scientific Gambit.
The article goes on a bit further but it's just more bullshit.
quote:
About FQXi
The Foundational Questions Institute, FQXi, catalyzes, supports, and disseminates research on questions at the foundations of science, particularly new frontiers in physics and innovative ideas integral to a deep understanding of reality but unlikely to be supported by conventional funding sources.
About the John Templeton Foundation
The John Templeton Foundation supports research and catalyzes conversations that inspire people with awe and wonder. With an endowment of $3.8 billion and annual giving of approximately $140 million, the Foundation ranks among the 25 largest grantmaking foundations in the United States and its philanthropic activities have engaged all major faith traditions and extended to more than 57 countries around the world.
Templeton put money into the Discovery Institute, didn't he?
Hey if these clowns at FQXi can get a grant from Templeton, we should cash in. FQXi is as empty as MrID

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 3 of 61 (891700)
02-09-2022 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Taq
02-09-2022 4:45 PM


Re: #N/A
Yep, #N/A is the only response to this question, because it is an appeal to incredulity, ignoring the lack of any way to calculate probabilities.
I don't expect great scientific scholarship at SciTechDaily, but their promotion of this pseudoscientific scam article is disappointing and makes me wonder if they have a vetting process.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Taq, posted 02-09-2022 4:45 PM Taq has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


(7)
Message 7 of 61 (891712)
02-09-2022 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by nwr
02-09-2022 6:35 PM


Re: Fine Tuned
You might even say this universe is fine tuned to create telescopes.
Looking around, I'm more inclined to think it is fine tuned to create idiots.
I'm just really pleased that we don't have to let the idiots look through our telescopes.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by nwr, posted 02-09-2022 6:35 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 13 of 61 (891778)
02-10-2022 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by dwise1
02-10-2022 7:13 PM


Re: Fine Tuned
"Dammit, Jim! I'm an engineer, not a philosopher!"
It would have been funnier if Spock had said it!

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by dwise1, posted 02-10-2022 7:13 PM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by dwise1, posted 02-10-2022 9:29 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 15 of 61 (891780)
02-10-2022 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by dwise1
02-10-2022 9:29 PM


Re: Fine Tuned
That cannot be done by redefining words in order to change reality. That is how theologians, philosophers, and lawyers roll, but not engineers.
Yep, nothing actually runs on BULLSHIT.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by dwise1, posted 02-10-2022 9:29 PM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by PaulK, posted 02-11-2022 7:55 AM Tanypteryx has not replied
 Message 17 by Taq, posted 02-11-2022 5:21 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 18 of 61 (891797)
02-11-2022 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Taq
02-11-2022 5:21 PM


Re: Fine Tuned
Yeah, there is a monster dairy farm up on the Columbia Plateau somewhere east of The Dalles that powers their whole operation with the methane from their manure. They are milking 50,000-100,000 cows twice each 24 hour period. Reducing methane to carbon dioxide reduces the greenhouse footprint a little bit.
But the other kind of bullshit, the verbal kind, seems to rot whatever someone is trying to power with it. My dad called the people who spread BULLSHIT, Bull Peddlers, the lowest of the low.
Edited by Tanypteryx, : No reason given.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Taq, posted 02-11-2022 5:21 PM Taq has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


(1)
Message 26 of 61 (891832)
02-12-2022 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Son Goku
02-12-2022 1:25 PM


Re: Fine-Tuned
In most Cosmological models it is actually true that our universe is "fine-tuned", as far as I understand the term. Only a vanishing amount of the parameter space for the Standard Model and also for theories of Quantum Gravity allow any complex structures to arise. And this is under any reasonable probability distribution.
OK, I understand that and agree that it is reasonable to think of it that way. ABE: I'm a fanboy of all this and love to listen to people a lot smarter than me talk about the whole physics of the Universe, but most of it is beyond my ability to deeply understand.
It seems like that could also mean though, that only universes with that vanishing amount of parameter space can exist. We only have one example of a Universe, and we know it works in some specific ways, but we cannot measure or predict universes that have other parameters. I may be wrong but it seems like there have been several changes in the fundamental parameters of this universe at specific stages in the development and evolution.
I really love hearing, reading and thinking about all the different hypotheses of cosmology and astrophysics. If any of these explanations are accurate, there have to be ways of eventually finding supporting evidence, if Homo sapiens survives as a curious species long enough.
I don't know what to make of it, it's a well known cosmology problem called the "naturalness" problem.
Maybe it's as simple as, this is the only way a universe can exist for 14 billion years.
Edited by Tanypteryx, : No reason given.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Son Goku, posted 02-12-2022 1:25 PM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Son Goku, posted 02-13-2022 9:02 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


(1)
Message 41 of 61 (891851)
02-14-2022 10:53 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by jar
02-14-2022 8:40 AM


Re: Full justification for EvC's existence.
The last few days posts in this thread IMHO are full and complete justification for EvC's existence.
The thread has been a classic example of Evolution in action.
I was thinking that exact thing myself, although I suspect QM says I wasn't.
I appreciate Son Goku explaining this to us, and I actually feel like I understood what he's saying, but when I try to conceptualize it my brain exploded (when I measured it). Thanks so much for hanging in here with us!!!

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by jar, posted 02-14-2022 8:40 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Son Goku, posted 02-14-2022 11:04 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 55 of 61 (892351)
03-05-2022 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Son Goku
02-28-2022 3:57 PM


Speed of Light = Speed of Gravity
A new question.
Why are the speeds of light and gravity equal? I assume it must be some fundamental feature of the Universe that sets that constant. Is it because the gravitational field of the Universe and spacetime are the same thing? Is this a stupid question?

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Son Goku, posted 02-28-2022 3:57 PM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by xongsmith, posted 03-06-2022 12:25 AM Tanypteryx has not replied
 Message 57 by AZPaul3, posted 03-06-2022 4:15 AM Tanypteryx has not replied
 Message 58 by Son Goku, posted 03-06-2022 12:00 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 59 of 61 (892373)
03-06-2022 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Son Goku
03-06-2022 12:00 PM


Re: Speed of Light = Speed of Gravity
Moving at the speed of light is essentially taking a path that skims right along the edges of these gaps, so it is impossible to move faster than this. Only if you are massless can you do this, which both light and gravity are.
OK, I think this makes sense...but why do they both travel at the same speed? Is it somehow the limit itself that sets the speed? Something about spacetime makes them both travel at the maximum possible speed, just because they are massless?
In modern physics the universe has a four dimensional shape that has "gaps" in it.
OK, what are the "gaps"?
Particles have mass so they cannot travel at the speed of light, but some of them can be accelerated to "almost" the speed of light with magnetic fields. So protons are just sitting there, not moving unless they are accelerated, but neutrinos seem to be always in motion at almost the speed of light. What gives them that speed or what accelerated them? *
*I know these are different questions but I wanted to get them asked before I forget.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Son Goku, posted 03-06-2022 12:00 PM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Son Goku, posted 03-06-2022 3:18 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 61 of 61 (892397)
03-06-2022 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Son Goku
03-06-2022 3:18 PM


Re: Speed of Light = Speed of Gravity
Because they are both massless. Everything massless moves right along the "edge" of these gaps/shortest paths in spacetime. Since it's the shortest path through spacetime there's no quicker way to move than that. Humans can imagine shorter paths, i.e. FTL ones, because we don't correctly intuit the actual shape of the universe. It's like how there is no shorter way to move along the surface of the Earth than going along a great circle.
Oh cool, it suddenly clicks into place! No guarantee, I will get it an hour from now, though.
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain all this to us, it means a lot!!

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Son Goku, posted 03-06-2022 3:18 PM Son Goku has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024