|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5930 Joined: Member Rating: 5.8
|
MrID, AKA Edgar Postrado, has published a Kindle version ($0.00) on amazon.com, The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down. Reading his own forward and the reviews of his work are very telling.
First, in his Message 89 WookieeB pondered whether English is not MrID's native language. MrID is from the Philippines and one reviewer says that English is his third language. However, years of experience on a programming forum visited by many non-native speakers has taught me that non-native speakers' English is far superior to native speakers' with the only problems being the occasional slightly odd word order and word choice (eg, in asking about how to use semaphores, a Portuguese programmer's dictionary wrote "lights" (as in traffic lights) because that's what his dictionary told him. Rather, MrID's immersion-blended English is not due to problems with English, but rather to his state of profound mental confusion. The first paragraph from MrID's "editorial review" reads:
quote: And his "From the author" has him comparing himself to Albert Einstein. 'Nuff said, but you can read it yourself if you're feeling masochistic. Here are the six reviews, 5 of them one-star (the lowest rating possible) that say a lot and one a 5-star that says almost nothing. First the 5-star review, the first one posted so it smells like a shill to me:
quote: Now the one-stars:
quote: quote: quote: quote: quote: Actually, it cannot even serve the same purpose as toilet paper since it's a Kindle file. Hence even more useless.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 308 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
Thank you for your comments.
To tell you the truth, I do not even care of my book reviews or my critics. What I care so much is if I am right or wrong in science, ... science, and not religion. I think that I am right. I think I nailed it. That is why I am the only scientist who is challenging anyone to fight me scientifically... The New Intelligent Design <id> and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations. | Zenodo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17822 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2
|
You aren’t a scientist and you aren’t doing science.
Seek psychiatric help. Please. For your own sake.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9970 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
MrID writes: What I care so much is if I am right or wrong in science Fist step: learn the basics of phylogenetics.
I think that I am right. I think I nailed it. Why would you think that if you don't even understand the most basic concepts in biology?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8513 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
I do not even care of my book reviews or my critics. If you're a scientist then you would care deeply. Peers are the only ones who can tell you if you are a real scientist doing real science or not.
What I care so much is if I am right or wrong in science, Then you have to present, to share, to show how your process works. Your peers are telling you that you are not doing science, have not done science. If you want to be a scientist you must prove yourself and your process to your peers. You have not done so.Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5930 Joined: Member Rating: 5.8 |
I do not even care of my book reviews or my critics. Of course you do not care, because you hate and must avoid reality at all costs. What those reviews reveal is that everybody who actually tries to read your crap arrives at the same evaluation of it: that it is nothing but crap, bullshit, bovine excrement, bat guano, nonsense. So it's not just your reception in this forum, but rather your reception everywhere. It does not matter one whit that you think it is perfect if everybody else recognizes it as nonsense. As our Lindy Hop teacher once advised us about rotating partners in group class:
quote: MrID, you have a problem with everybody who has ever attempted to read your ... crap. Let's face it, you are the problem, not the rest of the world. Please do something about it. Why are you here? What is your objective? What are you trying to accomplish? What are you doing that supports your objective? How is that working for you (ie, are you succeeding or failing and why?)? If your objective is to be a stupid troll and to thoroughly discredit both yourself and the ideas which you appear to state that you promote (ie, "intelligent design"), then you have been very successful in trolling and discrediting ID. If instead your objective is to convince us of your "new ID", then you are failing miserably, abysmally even. In order to succeed in convincing us of your "new ID" (or at the very least to understand it), you need to present your description of it and case for it clearly and intelligibly (meaning that we must be able to make sense of what you write). In other words, YOU MUST BE ABLE TO COMMUNICATE! It does not matter one whit how absolutely brilliant you believe yourself to be; if you cannot communicate your "brilliant knowledge" to us then that makes you nothing more than a gibbering idiot. Which is exactly what everybody who encounters you thinks you to be, because that is all you have demonstrated yourself to be. Stop it already! I do not even care of my book reviews or my critics. Then by saying that, the second stupidest thing you have ever said, you prove yourself to be a much bigger idiot than we thought you to be. Your critics are telling you what you are doing wrong, so by ignoring them that means that you can never learn anything. When you were learning arithmetic, whenever you performed a calculation incorrectly your teacher told you that you had gotten the problem wrong. That was the only way you had to know that you had gotten the wrong answer and that you needed to make corrections in order to learn how to get it right. If you had ignored your teacher every time he corrected your arithmetic mistakes, then you would have never learned arithmetic. Instead you would strut about (like a gallo cantando) full of absolutely empty pride over being infinitely superior to everybody else in arithmetic while at the same time being completely incapable of performing any arithmetic calculation. That is your current condition with regard to science ... and reality ... and everything else. You need to learn how to write. One good approach would be for you to employ some proofreaders (which was suggested by one of the reviews, which is further evidence of what a total f*cking idiot you are for ignoring him). Present your "article" to your proofreaders and listen to their critiques of it. I've told you this before in Message 99: DWise1 writes: Team up with friends and associates and use them to proofread your stuff. And listen to them! If they cannot understand what you're trying to say, then they will tell you that and they will tell you why. Using that feedback, you might be able to learn how to write. Continue on your current path and you will remain incomprehensible. So if you want to learn how to educate or convince someone, then team up with someone who will then tell you whether it worked (and far more importantly why it failed). That is why you need to work with proofreaders. Of course, we already know that you are far too much of a f*cking idiot to do what you need to. But you could always give us a pleasant surprise.
As the great American philosopher, Gomer Pyle (USMC), often said:
quote: Give up with your stupid links. We fell for that once and you have taught us far too well. Edited by dwise1, : Added qs at the beginning
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9
|
I think that I am right. I think I nailed it. That is why I am the only scientist who is challenging anyone to fight me scientifically... You are trying to convince a bunch of science nerds that you are a scientist, Dimwit. We can all see that you are a pathetic fraud!What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 308 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
I understand fully. I think supporters of ToE do not understand Biology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 308 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
You never get it. Those reviewers are not scientists!. A real scientist will surely read the discoveries, understand them, and rebut or agree. I am a very strong critic of Evolution, thus, but I did not give bad reviews to all ToE books. But I will be submitting my new article in science journals this month or early next month titled "Scientific Falsification of ToE and Introducing ToE's Replacement"...
I have many FREE science articles in Zenodo! That is how you fight, not bad reviews! Peers? I am discoverer in science. They are only a simple and normal scientist! The level is not the same intellectually! I'm higher, they are not! My writings are not bad. Of course, some of my grammars are probably wrong but GRAMMARS could be fixed, but bad science like ToE could not! Take the hint!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrIntelligentDesign Member (Idle past 308 days) Posts: 248 Joined: |
Just tell them to read my science article, put up or shut up!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9076 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.7 |
You tell 'em Einstein.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6408 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
A real scientist will surely read the discoveries, understand them, and rebut or agree.
There are real scientists here at evcforum, waiting to read you discoveries. But you never tell us what those discoveries are. This is why people have the impression that you don't actually have any discoveries.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9 |
Just tell them to read my science article, put up or shut up! You don't have any science articles. We would know, because we're science nerds and you are not!What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9 |
But I will be submitting my new article in science journals this month or early next month titled "Scientific Falsification of ToE and Introducing ToE's Replacement"... I bet you don't!What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9
|
I understand fully. I think supporters of ToE do not understand Biology. Oh good! Can you please explain ERV insertions in genomes and how they can be used to create phylogenies?What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024