I have not been following this thread. I have no clue what Percy just said ( I typically know exactly what he is trying to do, but I have to confess that he can FINALLY brag about my misunderstanding. It isn't bragging unless it is true).
I never knew Judicial Watch was mentioned here, either, until few hours ago.
I just find this site uninspired these days.
I remember when I used to debate people with real spirit.
My greatest moment ever (online) was when I got Howard Dean's online campaign maestro, Jerome Armstrong, to admit that there was strong evidence for a CIA hand in the 9/11 attacks. I dared him to post it on his MYDD blog. He said, in email, he was not afraid.
So he went and posted that he does not buy the official 9/11 story, for the whole world to see. He referenced the French intelligence showing the July 4-14 meeting in Dubai.
Right after that, Dean, on Diane Rheim, said he was intrigued by the idea that Bush got intel from the Saudis, but allowed the attack to happen.
I was so proud of myself!
(THE Daily Kos founder used to refer to Armstrong as his blogfather)
I used to debate men with character.
(And I bet polling would show that less than 50% buy the official 9/11 government story, in 2021. It was around 50/50 in a 2007 Rasmussen poll)
I like the bold ones better than the partisan mush we have here.
Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.
Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.