Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An Ether-Based Creation Model
Michael MD
Member (Idle past 521 days)
Posts: 108
Joined: 04-03-2021


Message 1 of 5 (885401)
04-11-2021 12:03 PM


My Creation Model is based on a theory of a universal ether that underlies the quantum/atomic processes observable to us. Currently, there is a growing body of dissident physics theorists who claim that consensus physics is in error in holding that such an ether does not exist. -Here, I will not try to go into all the aspects of this theoretical disconnect, but rather I will just present my ether-based model of creation.
In my Model, any ether would have to be universal, by its very nature, and it would have had to originate according to a logical sequence of events. I propose that what came first was universal space, a "pure" space, free from everything else, such as forces. Thus, it could have been extremely self-compatible, such that small "localities" within it were reciprocally oscillating. These localities would have probably been of a very tiny size, and conceivably ultimately-minuscule ("point-like.") -Then, "points" adjacent to each other underwent oscillatory fatigue, and formed "Yin and Yang" couplets. (Oscillatory fatigue is a known process. It occurs in metals.) -This transition broke the perfect symmetry of oscillation, so that now there were ultimately-rarified ("elemental") point-like, or "etheric," units, which were now independently vibrating, rather than reciprocally oscillating.
However, this transition would not have been uniform and simultaneous throughout space. Now there were, here and there, couplet-units which would have tended to merge, as their mutual matching vibrations contacted and combined with each other. (The idea here would be that the non-uniformity of this first-causal process would have included some areas where the motion of various units happened to be relatively linear, which would have accelerated the alignments of different units, causing the units to entrain with each other, producing larger and larger units, at first "etheroidal," and then up to the size-scale of quantum units and atoms.
At this point., there would have been multiple fluxes of energy units moving in different directions. Like-to-like resonances would have tended to form confluences, or "islands," where extremely-intense, extremely-rarified, and complex energic processes occurred. Within such an "island," the combinations of energy units could even have produced quantization, and solid moieties. If one such moiety, or body, happened to be roundish in shape (or"cosmic egg" like), then any energic interactions of the body's outer surface with the etheric radiations in its surroundings, which happened to be tangential, could have resulted in reverberating circuits of energy around the body, which then could have produced a sapient Entity (ies).
Eventually, the overall ongoing processes would have brought about an "ether macrocosm." However, the effects of the transient type of magnetism of such a macrocosm upon any quantum bodies at such a quantized "island" would have made things unstable there, so it was decided to create a quantum macrocosm (our universe.) To accomplish this, electron/photons (the smallest and speediest quantum units) were projected, using the intense surrounding energies, toward a "virgin" ether region, causing the ether there to undergo a patterned, chain-reactional, transition to quantum units (as the electrons' motion through the ether aligned the vibrations of ether units, producing entrainments into larger units. (One effect of the electron/photon unit being used to create the universe would have been that its velocity (the speed of light) would have remained as the highest speed limit in the universe.)
Edited by Michael MD, : typographical error (I typed "than" instead of the intended word. "that."

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 04-11-2021 12:48 PM Michael MD has replied

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 5 (885402)
04-11-2021 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Michael MD
04-11-2021 12:03 PM


Review Pending promotion
Welcome to EvC Michael. What do you define as a Creation Model?
And if promoted, which Forum would you prefer your argument to fit in? There are several directions you can go here.
Give me a bit of an idea.
Michael MD writes:
Eventually, the overall ongoing processes would have brought about an "ether macrocosm." However, the effects of the transient type of magnetism of such a macrocosm upon any quantum bodies at such a quantized "island" would have made things unstable there, so it was decided to create a quantum macrocosm (our universe.)
Sounds like a well thought out Sci Fi novel. Who is the character who decided to create this quantum macrocosm?
Do you want to learn from our peanut gallery of educated critically thinking minds or do you wish to challenge established science and propose an Intelligent Design or Faith Based argument? Be prepared to be challenged. Are you ready for intense scrutiny or do you want more of an opportunity to be heard? Finally, are you proposing a hypothetical story? If so, this bunch around here demands evidence. Perhaps one of our other administrators can weigh in on your topic. I am not inclined to promote without getting to know you a bit first. Stick around, though. We love new members.
Edited by AdminPhat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Michael MD, posted 04-11-2021 12:03 PM Michael MD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Michael MD, posted 04-12-2021 11:51 AM AdminPhat has replied

Michael MD
Member (Idle past 521 days)
Posts: 108
Joined: 04-03-2021


Message 3 of 5 (885424)
04-12-2021 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminPhat
04-11-2021 12:48 PM


Re: Review Pending promotion
My forum preference would be the Cosmology and Big Bang Forum.
I would thoroughly welcome any and all challenges. I have studied the scientific theoretic aspects that went into this Creation Model for years.
To be completely informative about how I arrived at my Model, I have been doing cryptographic research into a putatively-otherworldly set of codes in a historical Document (The Declaration of Independence), which I claim outlines "inside" but valid basic information needed to derive such a wide-ranging, yet consistently logical, cosmic model.
Michael Anteski (MD)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 04-11-2021 12:48 PM AdminPhat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminPhat, posted 04-12-2021 2:08 PM Michael MD has not replied

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 5 (885428)
04-12-2021 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Michael MD
04-12-2021 11:51 AM


Re: Review Pending promotion
Michael MD writes:
I would thoroughly welcome any and all challenges. I have studied the scientific theoretic aspects that went into this Creation Model for years.
I noticed. I saw you debating this same thing way back in 1997 at this forum.
I hope you have a thick skin, take none of the comments personally, and hang in here and do not run away.
If you can agree to that, I will give you your shot. I will put you in Is It Science?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Michael MD, posted 04-12-2021 11:51 AM Michael MD has not replied

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 5 (885434)
04-12-2021 2:08 PM


Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the An Ether-Based Creation Model thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024