Money Isn't a False God

We did in the 1950s. Since we did it then we know that it can be done.Other nations do it. Since other nations do it the US should be able to do it as wellBut unfortunately a vast percentage of US citizens are still convinced that SOURCE is more important than content, BELIEF more important than evidence and FANTASY more desirable than reality.As long as that remains true them what got will get.Them that's got shall have
Them that's not shall lose
So the Bible said and it still is news
Mama may have, Papa may have
But God bless the child that's got his own
That's got his ownYes, the strong gets more
While the weak ones fade
Empty pockets don't ever make the grade
Mama may have, Papa may have
But God bless the child that's got his own
That's got his ownAs long as US citizens subscribe to the Christian Cult of Ignorance only the rich will benefit. And they will suffer by choice and make all US citizens suffer.But the rest of the world should do just fine as long as they continue to Throw the God of the CCoI away.

Phat.All the Jews actually *know* God and that God had no son.All the Muslims actually *know* God and that God is Allah and that Jesus is his prophet.All the Buddhists actually *know* God and that God is all of the enlightened ones.All the Hindus actually *know* God and that God is actually many Gods.And they don't simply switch.

LOLAnd so it is YOUR belief, the god you created.Got it.But the Jews KNOW that God has no son so your belief or your God cannot be absolute or correct.AbE:Phat, once again you are simply marketing your own brand of snake oil and it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.Edited by jar, : AbE

No Phat. You have never argued, never presented evidence or rational argument to support your position; you do not argue and have never even shown that you know what it even means.You assert.I point out the FACT that the members of every other religion know that their position is correct and that you are wrong and so they demonstrate that your position has no more validity than their position. All are simply unsupported assertions including your assertion.To argue against that fact you need to present evidence or reasoned argumentation to support the validity of your position.You do not even sell any sizzle much less a steak.

Again Phat, go read Asimov's Guide to the Bible.Now I fully expect you will plead willful ignorance yet again by claiming Asimov was an atheist.BUT that is why you will remain willfully ignorant all of your life; it's so sad, pathetic and self defeating.YOU and all of the Christian Cult of Ignorance make the error of placing SOURCE over content.You dismiss reality and honesty and evidence and facts all in the name of your Willful Ignorance.

I'm sorry but that is simply stupid Phat unless you can provide a reasoned argument to support why SOURCE is relevant at all.

That is simply not true Phat and if you had any respect for honesty you would acknowledge that fact.I have never claimed infallibility.The whole basis of the Scientific Method is an acknowledgement of fallibility; that EVERYTHING is subject to independent verification and conclusions must always be held tentatively and be subject to revision if new and additional evidence contradicts those conclusions.You like all of the rest of the CCoI simply willfully misrepresent the meaning of words and the positions that are presented to you from outside the CCoI. And for a second time in the same post you once again lie!

Sheesh.You get close and then ruin it by saying something truly stupid like "I wont disagree, because for one thing I feel the Holy Spirit in that quote."You do not feel the Holy Spirit in that quote an if you had any respect for the truth you would admit you have never even been able to explain what the hell the Holy Spirit is or how you could "feel" it or taste it or test it.

Read what YOU write Phat and actually think about it. Actually read that Phat. It has absolutely no meaning beyond you believing what you believe is fact.It is all what YOU create and there is no substance beyond that.AbE: See above.You don't say "when something is supported by evidence" but rather "when something feels true".It is all simply a product of YOUR imagination, what you want to be true; it is all simply YOUR creation.Edited by jar, : see AbE: